Re: More signings to come? : Fri Oct 31, 2014 11:27 pm  

Dave K. wrote:

Your RL knowledge is pretty poor, Eastmond wasn't rejected by Leeds he chose to leave

Massive irony alert. Your RL knowledge is poor enough to confuse the rotund Greg Eastwood with the svelte like figure of Kyle Eastmond.

Re: More signings to come? : Sat Nov 01, 2014 12:03 am  

SirStan wrote:

Massive irony alert. Your RL knowledge is poor enough to confuse the rotund Greg Eastwood with the svelte like figure of Kyle Eastmond.

Nice one Stanley!

Re: More signings to come? : Sat Nov 01, 2014 6:03 am  

Dave K. wrote:

I would have been gutted if we had signed him, not because I don't like him, but that he has been poor for a couple of years now, decent defender, but offers very little going forward. Check out his stats for last year, always thought him overrated and carried in a great Leeds side, guess we will find out next year.

You signed Feka and the bin man last season, both are now raved about at your club, didn't exactly come in on top form did they?

Re: More signings to come? : Sat Nov 01, 2014 7:59 am  

SirStan wrote:

Massive irony alert. Your RL knowledge is poor enough to confuse the rotund Greg Eastwood with the svelte like figure of Kyle Eastmond.

Fair point but bit of a difference in typing the wrong name then making things up about a player being a reject, point still stands though, Bailey has been poor for the last couple of years the fact Leeds have released him when they aren't blessed with loads of props plus keeping Kirke over him tells it's own story.

Re: More signings to come? : Sat Nov 01, 2014 8:01 am  

Rupert Pupkin wrote:

You signed Feka and the bin man last season, both are now raved about at your club, didn't exactly come in on top form did they?

I've no idea I never saw them play. We certainly signed some a couple of gambles last year, you seem to have followed that by signing a full team of gambles.

Re: More signings to come? : Sat Nov 01, 2014 8:31 am  

Dave K. wrote:

I've no idea I never saw them play. We certainly signed some a couple of gambles last year, you seem to have followed that by signing a full team of gambles.

You never saw them play?

not guaranteed any signing is going to work out!

Re: More signings to come? : Sat Nov 01, 2014 8:35 am  

Rupert Pupkin wrote:

You never saw them play?

not guaranteed any signing is going to work out!

Not in the last couple of seasons when one was playing in France and the other working the bins.

All signings are gambles but some are higher gambles than others as we have found out in the past.

Re: More signings to come? : Sat Nov 01, 2014 8:45 am  

Dave K. wrote:

Not in the last couple of seasons when one was playing in France and the other working the bins.

All signings are gambles but some are higher gambles than others as we have found out in the past.

So you are basically saying that our gambles are no hopers but any gamble made by FC are gambles worth taking. I get it now.

Re: More signings to come? : Sat Nov 01, 2014 8:50 am  

Dave K. wrote:

Fair point but bit of a difference in typing the wrong name then making things up about a player being a reject, point still stands though, Bailey has been poor for the last couple of years the fact Leeds have released him when they aren't blessed with loads of props plus keeping Kirke over him tells it's own story.

tells me that Kirke is a much smaller burden on their salary cap. I bet you can't find a Leeds fan who rates Kirke over Bailey.

Re: More signings to come? : Sat Nov 01, 2014 8:54 am  

DuaneDibbley wrote:

So you are basically saying that our gambles are no hopers but any gamble made by FC are gambles worth taking. I get it now.

No.