Lawrie L wrote:
I think this case is far too murky and I think a line has been drawn so quickly underneath it that it has left others who may be guilty off
I disagree on the "so quickly" – it's almost a generation.
But yes, I do understand why people might feel a tad suspicious.
As mentioned previously, the case remains open on the Met's books, apparently. This case was only possible – as I understand it – because of developments in forensic science and technology. Who is to say what may occur on those fronts in the future?