Labour split comimg? : Thu Apr 11, 2013 12:30 pm  

Is Tony trying to stir trouble in his capacity as Thatcher's heir? Is he right? Is he causing trouble in the hope of making a come back or paving the way for Ed's brother to take the call and do his bit for party and country by dropping all in NYC? Or it is just that he's the only one who can safely say Ed's unelectable? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... otest.html

Is Tony trying to stir trouble in his capacity as Thatcher's heir? Is he right? Is he causing trouble in the hope of making a come back or paving the way for Ed's brother to take the call and do his bit for party and country by dropping all in NYC? Or it is just that he's the only one who can safely say Ed's unelectable? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... otest.html

Re: Labour split comimg? : Thu Apr 11, 2013 12:36 pm  

He's missing being headline news is all.

Re: Labour split comimg? : Thu Apr 11, 2013 12:38 pm  

If you rhink he could ever credibly run for high office again then my c0cks a kipper.

Re: Labour split comimg? : Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:01 pm  

Tony getting his hands back on the PM job has as much a chance of success as Maggot Fracture getting a state funeral attended by the queen.

It'll never happen

Re: Labour split comimg? : Thu Apr 11, 2013 2:39 pm  

Dally wrote: Is Tony trying to stir trouble in his capacity as Thatcher's heir? Is he right? Is he causing trouble in the hope of making a come back or paving the way for Ed's brother to take the call and do his bit for party and country by dropping all in NYC? Or it is just that he's the only one who can safely say Ed's unelectable? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... otest.html No. He's written an article for the Staggers, which, if you read it occasionally, you'd know that it runs articles like that all the time, inviting contrary views and everything.

Dally wrote: Is Tony trying to stir trouble in his capacity as Thatcher's heir? Is he right? Is he causing trouble in the hope of making a come back or paving the way for Ed's brother to take the call and do his bit for party and country by dropping all in NYC? Or it is just that he's the only one who can safely say Ed's unelectable? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... otest.html No. He's written an article for the Staggers, which, if you read it occasionally, you'd know that it runs articles like that all the time, inviting contrary views and everything.

Re: Labour split comimg? : Thu Apr 11, 2013 4:49 pm  

WIZEB wrote:

my c0cks a kipper.

Shh! There'll be people on here who'll want to eat it for breakfast.

Re: Labour split comimg? : Thu Apr 11, 2013 5:10 pm  

Dally wrote:

Shh! There'll be people on here who'll want to eat it for breakfast.

Perhaps one or two already have?

Re: Labour split comimg? : Thu Apr 11, 2013 5:36 pm  

WIZEB wrote:

Perhaps one or two already have?

Re: Labour split comimg? : Thu Apr 11, 2013 5:49 pm  

peggy wrote:

:wink:

Re: Labour split comimg? : Thu Apr 11, 2013 10:47 pm  

Labour 14 points ahead of the tories and Blair feels the need to offer his advice?