If you really think moving chess pieces involves "physical exertion" then you are mad as a box of frogs. Honestly, it ain't what we're talking about.
Gardening is, actually, an extremely good source of physical activity. It can involve a great deal of exertion, and usually much aerobic exercise. But it is plainly nutty of you to suggest it fits the definition as a sport, so I am more inclined to the view that you're on the wind up.
Gardening fit your definition of sport perfectly "An activity involving physical exertion and skill that is governed by a set of rules or customs and often undertaken competitively".
You could also include Masterchef and the Great British Bake Off as sporting events using that definition.
And "physical exertion" can mean blinking. I'm a scientist, I measure femtograms of substances in biological solution, without setting parameters for the quantity of exertion the statement you made is completely applicable to the act of moving a chess piece.
Advice is what we seek when we already know the answer - but wish we didn't
I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full-frontal lobotomy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ kirkstaller wrote: "All DNA shows is that we have a common creator."
cod'ead wrote: "I have just snotted weissbier all over my keyboard & screen"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "No amount of cajolery, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party. So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin." - Aneurin Bevan
Gardening fit your definition of sport perfectly "An activity involving physical exertion and skill that is governed by a set of rules or customs and often undertaken competitively".
You could also include Masterchef and the Great British Bake Off as sporting events using that definition.
And "physical exertion" can mean blinking. ..., without setting parameters for the quantity of exertion the statement you made is completely applicable to the act of moving a chess piece.
Not at all. You are relying on semantics to produce an absurd argument, and making yourself look like some remedial pedant who came last with nul points in the school debate, but is convinced he won.
DHM wrote:
I'm a scientist, I measure femtograms of substances in biological solution
Is that right? You're such a zany guy, I'd never have guessed, but jolly well done with that
Not at all. You are relying on semantics to produce an absurd argument, and making yourself look like some remedial pedant who came last with nul points in the school debate, but is convinced he won.
Is that right? You're such a zany guy, I'd never have guessed, but jolly well done with that
Too f******g easy pal.
Ferocious Aardvark wrote:
Not at all. You are relying on semantics to produce an absurd argument, and making yourself look like some remedial pedant who came last with nul points in the school debate, but is convinced he won.
Is that right? You're such a zany guy, I'd never have guessed, but jolly well done with that
Too f******g easy pal.
This post contains an image, if you are the copyright owner and would like this image removed then please contact support@rlfans.com