Re: BorisGate - A Christmas Cover Up : Mon Dec 20, 2021 7:34 am  

I like the bit where the rag desperate to get some attention says they shared the photograph, who with exactly? certainly not with a photographer with a legitimate reason for being there, probably some hack desperate to earn a crust what will go to any length to earn it I wonder how much the paper paid for the photograph incidentally, it shows the determination some people will go to, to try and get noticed 8 month after the event, even by using a drone if that were the case, I'd be more concerned at the lack of security surrounding the area.

Re: BorisGate - A Christmas Cover Up : Mon Dec 20, 2021 8:16 am  

chissitt wrote:

I like the bit where the rag desperate to get some attention says they shared the photograph, who with exactly? certainly not with a photographer with a legitimate reason for being there, probably some hack desperate to earn a crust what will go to any length to earn it I wonder how much the paper paid for the photograph incidentally, it shows the determination some people will go to, to try and get noticed 8 month after the event, even by using a drone if that were the case, I'd be more concerned at the lack of security surrounding the area.

LOL you clown. The picture was taken from one of the offices in the Downing St complex. ie. its release is an inside job.

Re: BorisGate - A Christmas Cover Up : Mon Dec 20, 2021 8:17 am  

Be careful because your mask of neutrality is continuing to fall. This time it’s the newspapers at fault when the majority of people would say that it shows de Pfeffel breaking his own rules.
I suppose you want the press to only report on the vaccine roll out, I wonder where you got that idea from.

Re: BorisGate - A Christmas Cover Up : Mon Dec 20, 2021 8:36 am  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

Be careful because your mask of neutrality is continuing to fall. This time it’s the newspapers at fault when the majority of people would say that it shows de Pfeffel breaking his own rules.

chissitt wrote:

Can I just point out that I don't object to you calling him de pleffel, I merely asked why you have suddenly started calling him that instead of Boris, and what is the reason for it, if that helps.

I see you still can't answer my question, my mask of neutrality is of little or no concern of yours other than your stock reply to side foot my questions.

Re: BorisGate - A Christmas Cover Up : Mon Dec 20, 2021 8:40 am  

The Ghost of '99 wrote:

LOL you clown. The picture was taken from one of the offices in the Downing St complex. ie. its release is an inside job.

Insults are usually a sign of a lack of education

Re: BorisGate - A Christmas Cover Up : Mon Dec 20, 2021 9:27 am  

What question ?.

Re: BorisGate - A Christmas Cover Up : Mon Dec 20, 2021 9:51 am  

chissitt wrote:

Insults are usually a sign of a lack of education

Not really. If you make buffoonish statements, don't get upset when people point them out.

Re: BorisGate - A Christmas Cover Up : Mon Dec 20, 2021 10:52 am  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

What question ?.

The simple one you keep ignoring, which is why have you suddenly started calling him de pleffel, do you think it makes you stand out? are you just attention seeking?

Re: BorisGate - A Christmas Cover Up : Mon Dec 20, 2021 11:00 am  

His name is actually not Boris it is Alexander, Boris de Pfeffel therefore he chooses to use the first part of his second name so I call him by the second part of the same name because it better reflects what he speaks. I hope this answers your question and you can return to not defending the government.

Re: BorisGate - A Christmas Cover Up : Mon Dec 20, 2021 11:04 am  

The Ghost of '99 wrote:

Not really. If you make buffoonish statements, don't get upset when people point them out.

chissitt wrote:

I like the bit where the rag desperate to get some attention says they shared the photograph, who with exactly? certainly not with a photographer with a legitimate reason for being there, probably some hack desperate to earn a crust what will go to any length to earn it I wonder how much the paper paid for the photograph incidentally, it shows the determination some people will go to, to try and get noticed 8 month after the event, even by using a drone if that were the case, I'd be more concerned at the lack of security surrounding the area.

Above is my buffoonish statement, please dissect it in your usual immaculate and stylish manner, and then when you have actually pointed out the parts of my statement you find buffoonish, perhaps I might understand, far easier than throwing insults about, have a bit of class child