Re: OMG - Christian wins employment tribunal : Fri Nov 23, 2012 1:14 pm  

cod'ead wrote:

You are aware that love and sex are not the same thing? If so, why are you conflating them?

Because sex is an aspect of love. It's sad that you need to ask really!

Obviously, sex can be separate from love, and all but romantic forms of love would not include sex (or at least I hope they wouldn't). But the love which I would say 99 times out of 100 is involved in marriage will include sex.

Re: OMG - Christian wins employment tribunal : Fri Nov 23, 2012 1:59 pm  

Rock God X wrote:

I'm still confused as to why 'God' turned herbivorous dinosaurs into carnivorous dinosaurs because a human (whether you accept humans are apes or not) ate an apple. Perhaps kirkstaller could explain it to me.

When Adam and Eve disobeyed God, death entered the world. Before the fall there was no death.

Re: OMG - Christian wins employment tribunal : Fri Nov 23, 2012 2:01 pm  

El Barbudo wrote:

Let me get this straight.
Your view is that there's nothing in the evolution of new species that contradicts Genesis.
Your view is that man didn't evolve to become man, he was created as man by god.

That is correct.

So, what is your view about myriad of mutations of human genetic code that have occurred over ten of thousands of years, do they not tell us that man has evolved as he has migrated around the globe?
I'm guessing that you do accept that man has evolved, but that it is your view that whilst man has evolved, he has only evolved from the originally-god-created form of man.

Where do other forms such as australopithicus and neanderthal man fit into your view?
Were they men or animals?

Animals.

The evidence that has been found in this area is evidence of an extinct species of animal not too disimilar to apes. They were not an earlier incarnation of mankind.

Re: OMG - Christian wins employment tribunal : Fri Nov 23, 2012 2:08 pm  

kirkstaller wrote:

The evidence that has been found in this area is evidence of an extinct species of animal not too disimilar to apes. They were not an earlier incarnation of mankind.

Examined them have you?

Re: OMG - Christian wins employment tribunal : Fri Nov 23, 2012 2:11 pm  

kirkstaller wrote:

When Adam and Eve disobeyed God, death entered the world. Before the fall there was no death.

That doesn't answer my question.

Re: OMG - Christian wins employment tribunal : Fri Nov 23, 2012 2:24 pm  

Rock God X wrote:

That doesn't answer my question.

God turned his perfect creation into a rotten, violent world as a judgment on our sin.

Re: OMG - Christian wins employment tribunal : Fri Nov 23, 2012 2:41 pm  

kirkstaller wrote:

God turned his perfect creation into a rotten, violent world as a judgment on our sin.

Nice God you worship there.


What utter piffle.

Re: OMG - Christian wins employment tribunal : Fri Nov 23, 2012 2:43 pm  

SaintsFan wrote:

Because sex is an aspect of love. It's sad that you need to ask really!

Obviously, sex can be separate from love, and all but romantic forms of love would not include sex (or at least I hope they wouldn't). But the love which I would say 99 times out of 100 is involved in marriage will include sex.

"I hope they wouldn't".

Why.

What business is it of yours? How do the sex lives of other consenting adults it affect you?

Re: OMG - Christian wins employment tribunal : Fri Nov 23, 2012 3:38 pm  

kirkstaller wrote:

That is correct.

Animals.

The evidence that has been found in this area is evidence of an extinct species of animal not too disimilar to apes. They were not an earlier incarnation of mankind.

Kirkstaller, do you accept the evidence that at some point in the past your ancestors interbred with Neanderthals?

If not, would you reject the use of a paternity test (if god forbid you found evidence your wife was cheating around the time of your child's conception)? And would you refuse to use DNA evidence to convict someone who committed a crime against you? Because both of these are based on the same scientific principles that proved you are part Neanderthal, thus part animal (using your definition).

Please note, this is clearly a hypothetical question, dodging it by saying 'but my wife would never do that' will just make you look like a disingenuous troll.

Re: OMG - Christian wins employment tribunal : Fri Nov 23, 2012 3:40 pm  

Mintball wrote:

"I hope they wouldn't".

Why.

What business is it of yours? How do the sex lives of other consenting adults it affect you?

Always amazes me how obsessed many religious types are with other people's sex lives.