Re: Malaysia Airlines place vanishes. : Fri Jul 25, 2014 12:07 am  

GraftonRed wrote:

Perhaps you should rename yourself "cock'ead. You take great pride in trying to belittle people if they don't state what they are saying to the the letter, this time your little bit of fun pokeing has stooped below even your low standards...not even funny that comment, but i'm sure the cuddle crew will be here to defend your discusting comment shortly.

Hello shit-for-brains!

If a "failure to land" is now a euphemism for a crash, what is crash a euphemism for?

Or are you the type who uses the term "he has passed" instead of "he's dead"?

If you're that sensitive, stay off social media. There's a good lad

Re: Malaysia Airlines place vanishes. : Fri Jul 25, 2014 12:11 am  

broadybull87 wrote: Thats not good. just found this website hard to comprehend the number of flights in the world http://www.flightradar24.com/48.84,-99.7/4 I think its astounding Take a look at the AIS site for shipping. And remember each of them is sailing on exactly the same plane Costa Concordia being towed to Genoa for scrap

broadybull87 wrote: Thats not good. just found this website hard to comprehend the number of flights in the world http://www.flightradar24.com/48.84,-99.7/4 I think its astounding Take a look at the AIS site for shipping. And remember each of them is sailing on exactly the same plane Costa Concordia being towed to Genoa for scrap

Re: Malaysia Airlines place vanishes. : Fri Jul 25, 2014 9:34 am  

cod'ead wrote: Take a look at the AIS site for shipping. And remember each of them is sailing on exactly the same plane Costa Concordia being towed to Genoa for scrap Ships On A Plane? Samuel L. Jackson should make a film about that.

cod'ead wrote: Take a look at the AIS site for shipping. And remember each of them is sailing on exactly the same plane Costa Concordia being towed to Genoa for scrap Ships On A Plane? Samuel L. Jackson should make a film about that.

Re: Malaysia Airlines place vanishes. : Fri Jul 25, 2014 1:54 pm  

cod'ead wrote: Take a look at the AIS site for shipping. Music lied to me. Liberia rules the waves.

cod'ead wrote: Take a look at the AIS site for shipping. Music lied to me. Liberia rules the waves.

Re: Malaysia Airlines place vanishes. : Fri Jul 25, 2014 7:08 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

Ships On A Plane?

Samuel L. Jackson should make a film about that.

If I meant the short version of aeroplane, I would've written 'plane

Re: Malaysia Airlines place vanishes. : Fri Jul 25, 2014 7:58 pm  

cod'ead wrote:

If I meant the short version of aeroplane, I would've written 'plane

BS

Re: Malaysia Airlines place vanishes. : Fri Jul 25, 2014 8:04 pm  

cod'ead wrote:

If I meant the short version of aeroplane, I would've written 'plane

Re: Malaysia Airlines place vanishes. : Fri Jul 25, 2014 11:46 pm  

cod'ead wrote:

If I meant the short version of aeroplane, I would've written 'plane

Re: Malaysia Airlines place vanishes. : Sat Jul 26, 2014 4:35 am  

Saddened! wrote: And another one goes. A domestic Transasia flight in Taiwan has crashed after failing to land killing 'more than 40' of the 54 on board. cod'ead wrote: If it "failed to land", how come it's not still flying? Because it "crashed" after failing to land. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/j ... hoon-matmo "Forty-eight people are dead and 10 injured after their plane crashed while trying to land at a Taiwanese airport on Wednesday evening, hours after typhoon Matmo battered the region." cod'ead wrote: Hello shit-for-brains!! If a "failure to land" is now a euphemism for a crash, what is crash a euphemism for? Where is "failure to land" being used as a euphemism for crash? If Saddened had just put "And another one goes. A domestic Transasia flight in Taiwan has failed to land killing 'more than 40' of the 54 on board." then it could have been a euphemism, but he didn't. If you really can't grasp what Saddened said and need it explaining word for word so that you can, then it is you that has "shit-for-brains!" not me, as i know, like everyone else on here, what he said. cod'ead wrote: If you're that sensitive, stay off social media. There's a good lad Not sensitive, i just find it abhorrent you have to use the deaths of 40+ people to score points against other posters on here... ...and i'm sure if anyone else had put "And remember each of them is sailing on exactly the same plane" you'd have been right on their case with a little putdown, seems you can give but not take.

Saddened! wrote: And another one goes. A domestic Transasia flight in Taiwan has crashed after failing to land killing 'more than 40' of the 54 on board. cod'ead wrote: If it "failed to land", how come it's not still flying? Because it "crashed" after failing to land. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/j ... hoon-matmo "Forty-eight people are dead and 10 injured after their plane crashed while trying to land at a Taiwanese airport on Wednesday evening, hours after typhoon Matmo battered the region." cod'ead wrote: Hello shit-for-brains!! If a "failure to land" is now a euphemism for a crash, what is crash a euphemism for? Where is "failure to land" being used as a euphemism for crash? If Saddened had just put "And another one goes. A domestic Transasia flight in Taiwan has failed to land killing 'more than 40' of the 54 on board." then it could have been a euphemism, but he didn't. If you really can't grasp what Saddened said and need it explaining word for word so that you can, then it is you that has "shit-for-brains!" not me, as i know, like everyone else on here, what he said. cod'ead wrote: If you're that sensitive, stay off social media. There's a good lad Not sensitive, i just find it abhorrent you have to use the deaths of 40+ people to score points against other posters on here... ...and i'm sure if anyone else had put "And remember each of them is sailing on exactly the same plane" you'd have been right on their case with a little putdown, seems you can give but not take.

Re: Malaysia Airlines place vanishes. : Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:23 pm  

GraftonRed wrote: Because it "crashed" after failing to land. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/j ... hoon-matmo "Forty-eight people are dead and 10 injured after their plane crashed while trying to land at a Taiwanese airport on Wednesday evening, hours after typhoon Matmo battered the region." Where is "failure to land" being used as a euphemism for crash? If Saddened had just put "And another one goes. A domestic Transasia flight in Taiwan has failed to land killing 'more than 40' of the 54 on board." then it could have been a euphemism, but he didn't. If you really can't grasp what Saddened said and need it explaining word for word so that you can, then it is you that has "shit-for-brains!" not me, as i know, like everyone else on here, what he said. Not sensitive, i just find it abhorrent you have to use the deaths of 40+ people to score points against other posters on here... ...and i'm sure if anyone else had put "And remember each of them is sailing on exactly the same plane" you'd have been right on their case with a little putdown, seems you can give but not take. The flight crashed after failing to land "safely". It landed sure enough

GraftonRed wrote: Because it "crashed" after failing to land. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/j ... hoon-matmo "Forty-eight people are dead and 10 injured after their plane crashed while trying to land at a Taiwanese airport on Wednesday evening, hours after typhoon Matmo battered the region." Where is "failure to land" being used as a euphemism for crash? If Saddened had just put "And another one goes. A domestic Transasia flight in Taiwan has failed to land killing 'more than 40' of the 54 on board." then it could have been a euphemism, but he didn't. If you really can't grasp what Saddened said and need it explaining word for word so that you can, then it is you that has "shit-for-brains!" not me, as i know, like everyone else on here, what he said. Not sensitive, i just find it abhorrent you have to use the deaths of 40+ people to score points against other posters on here... ...and i'm sure if anyone else had put "And remember each of them is sailing on exactly the same plane" you'd have been right on their case with a little putdown, seems you can give but not take. The flight crashed after failing to land "safely". It landed sure enough