Re: Poor Lady Thatcher? : Sun Jan 01, 2012 1:52 am  

cod'ead wrote:

What are the vetting qualifications to become her carer?

I understand Beverley Allitt was the best candidate to do the job...

Re: Poor Lady Thatcher? : Sun Jan 01, 2012 1:59 am  

She made hundreds of thousands of people better off.
She ruined millions and millions of peoples lives at the same time. The repercussions of her policies are still being felt now on estates all over britain.I really really wish she died ten years ago,politics would have been so much simpler then. Having said what iv'e said why has no government 'since' tryed to reverse her policies?

Re: Poor Lady Thatcher? : Sun Jan 01, 2012 2:13 am  

cod'ead wrote:

She did enough to destroy whole communities in this country.

She personally destroyed communities ? She was the only person involved in making descisions that affected those communities ?
That is akin to suggesting that Ronald is responsible for your burger being undercooked .

I ain't getting any further involved in that discussion . There is an old lady that is ill , and regardless of her previous she deserves sympathy .

Re: Poor Lady Thatcher? : Sun Jan 01, 2012 2:20 am  

BaldRick wrote:

She personally destroyed communities ? She was the only person involved in making descisions that affected those communities ?

And Hitler was not, alone, responsible for the Holocaust.

Re: Poor Lady Thatcher? : Sun Jan 01, 2012 2:33 am  

Mintball wrote:

And Hitler was not, alone, responsible for the Holocaust.

How very true . But in the grand scale of things this frail old lady ( of whom I am not a great fan may I add ) is better compared to Ronald than Adolph .

Re: Poor Lady Thatcher? : Sun Jan 01, 2012 4:16 am  

El Barbudo wrote:

Oh come now, think about it ... a total tw@ spawned by parents of the same ilk, what did you expect of him?

Nonetheless, much as I despise her, I wouldn't have wished her current condition upon her.

This

Re: Poor Lady Thatcher? : Sun Jan 01, 2012 11:10 am  

cod'ead wrote:

As much as I shall rejoice in her death, I will enjoy all the time in between, watching her being ignored by her loved ones. She did enough to destroy whole communities in this country. So if her over-privileged, idiot progeny decide that they've had enough of the old fooking witch, at least they're showing some sense.

What a quality specimen of humanity you are !
Do you share the same view for the war criminal now proving himself to be a first class Middle East peace envoy
who didn't look to make too good a job ensuring peace for his mate Gaddafi ?
I don't think she is being ignored by her loved ones as she gave up on her son a long time ago - after he was lost in the desert,and her daughter after her relationship with Jonathan Aitken.
As you seem to be referring to 'other people', and not yourself, when suggesting she 'did enough to destroy whole communities in this country' could you be more specific?
As for her progeny showing some sense - so did Scargill and his mate Ricky Tomlinson,and of course Derek Hatton - those 3 have hardly suffered,have they ? One or two sheep suffered,but they would,anyway.
With you not being religious I do hope you didn't celebrate Christmas - and if in employment ensured you worked and eschewed the possibility of any holidays.You being such a man of principle,of course.

Re: Poor Lady Thatcher? : Sun Jan 01, 2012 11:47 am  

SCR-SeaDiver wrote:

What a quality specimen of humanity you are !
Do you share the same view for the war criminal now proving himself to be a first class Middle East peace envoy
who didn't look to make too good a job ensuring peace for his mate Gaddafi ?
I don't think she is being ignored by her loved ones as she gave up on her son a long time ago - after he was lost in the desert,and her daughter after her relationship with Jonathan Aitken.
As you seem to be referring to 'other people', and not yourself, when suggesting she 'did enough to destroy whole communities in this country' could you be more specific?
As for her progeny showing some sense - so did Scargill and his mate Ricky Tomlinson,and of course Derek Hatton - those 3 have hardly suffered,have they ? One or two sheep suffered,but they would,anyway.
With you not being religious I do hope you didn't celebrate Christmas - and if in employment ensured you worked and eschewed the possibility of any holidays.You being such a man of principle,of course.

Wow - A Tory humanitarian

No, seriously folks, I'd like to commend SCR on the incredible political sophistication of this post, and humbly venture to follow it up with a riposte which I trust will live up to his lofty standard of debate:

Ner, ner, na, ner, ner. My dad's bigger than your dad.

Re: Poor Lady Thatcher? : Sun Jan 01, 2012 11:53 am  

SCR-SeaDiver wrote:

As you seem to be referring to 'other people', and not yourself, when suggesting she 'did enough to destroy whole communities in this country' could you be more specific?

Nothing more to add but a quote from the woman herself whilst holding the office of Prime Minister in her third term...

And, you know, there is no such thing as society. There are individual men and women, and there are families. And no government can do anything except through people, and people must look to themselves first. It's our duty to look after ourselves...

A Prime Minister who feels no obligation to look after the population, who feels that its up to each individual to look out for themselves (however well or ill equipped that individual is) is a Prime Minister who didn't fully understand the job description when he/she came for the interview.

Re: Poor Lady Thatcher? : Sun Jan 01, 2012 11:56 am  

The moron would not have any of his trappings if it was not for his mother fixing it for him, she deserves all the pain and misery she gets, I hope she lives until she is 150 and suffers every day.