Indeed it's not. But that doesn't take away the bad experience I've had and many other people have had at the hands of these so called charity's. Feel free to defend them all you want. But in the meantime there's people out they who are struggling with their lives and there's nobody they to help them me included.
I love Jamie and have done since he was 10 years old.
The Reason wrote:
Hi Andy
The Rugby Football League are in the process of reviewing the video that you are referring to. We do not condone behaviour of this nature and have contacted the player’s employer, Hull F.C., who have confirmed that they are dealing with the incident under their club rules.
I don't like Gervais or his sneery kind of humour, so I switch him off when he's on TV. I don't like the Daily Mail or its self-centred harrumphing up its own arris, so I don't buy it. I had never even heard the word "Mong" before this story broke (maybe I live in a different bubble) but I gather that it is a derogatory term for people with Down's Syndrome. From that, I have to assume that Gervais is a prat, unless there's something that I've missed.
But I'll keep an eye on this thread because there may be more about this word that I don't know. e.g. Can anyone give me an example of when it is considered OK to use the word?
Although he said that, ‘When she first came on the telly, I went, “Is that a mong?”,’ he insisted: ‘I don't mean she has Down’s Syndrome, by the way. No! No that would be offensive. That word doesn't mean that any more.’
And they claimed the joke was not directed at Susan Boyle as having a disability but ‘...at those who refuse to acknowledge that the meanings of words can adapt over time’.
El Barbudo wrote:
I don't like Gervais or his sneery kind of humour, so I switch him off when he's on TV. I don't like the Daily Mail or its self-centred harrumphing up its own arris, so I don't buy it. I had never even heard the word "Mong" before this story broke (maybe I live in a different bubble) but I gather that it is a derogatory term for people with Down's Syndrome. From that, I have to assume that Gervais is a prat, unless there's something that I've missed.
But I'll keep an eye on this thread because there may be more about this word that I don't know. e.g. Can anyone give me an example of when it is considered OK to use the word?
Although he said that, ‘When she first came on the telly, I went, “Is that a mong?”,’ he insisted: ‘I don't mean she has Down’s Syndrome, by the way. No! No that would be offensive. That word doesn't mean that any more.’
And they claimed the joke was not directed at Susan Boyle as having a disability but ‘...at those who refuse to acknowledge that the meanings of words can adapt over time’.
I love Jamie and have done since he was 10 years old.
The Reason wrote:
Hi Andy
The Rugby Football League are in the process of reviewing the video that you are referring to. We do not condone behaviour of this nature and have contacted the player’s employer, Hull F.C., who have confirmed that they are dealing with the incident under their club rules.
One thing you can be sure of is that the "thought nazis" of the world will be trying to prove how offensive things are, to tell us what's right and what's wrong so that if we dare laugh, we can be riddled with shame and guilt.
I don't think any word should be off limits, or that anything should be considered "too offensive" for a comedian to say. If we are going to have free speech, we can't be selective about when that applies. The only possible exception to this should be where there is clear evidence of a person inciting violence. "Mong" isn't a word I'd use myself, or one I find particularly funny, but if Gervais wants to use it in his act, it's up to his audience to decide whether they continue watching his show or not.
One thing you can be sure of is that the "thought nazis" of the world will be trying to prove how offensive things are, to tell us what's right and what's wrong so that if we dare laugh, we can be riddled with shame and guilt.
You can laugh at it. You can be offended by it.
I must be one of those "thought nazis" then. It's a free country of sorts and people have the freedom to laugh at the word if they like but anyone who finds that word funny should grow up and think a bit.
I must be one of those "thought nazis" then. It's a free country of sorts and people have the freedom to laugh at the word if they like but anyone who finds that word funny should grow up and think a bit.
I fully agree with the last part of your post, but that's not a reason for censorship, is it?
The freedom of speech doesn't necessary mean the freedom to abuse. However I do think that Ricky has gone about this in the right way at the right place.
I must be one of those "thought nazis" then. It's a free country of sorts and people have the freedom to laugh at the word if they like but anyone who finds that word funny should grow up and think a bit.
Out of Interest. What puts you in such a position that you feel the need to tell people to "grow up and think a bit" about a word.
Out of Interest. What puts you in such a position that you feel the need to tell people to "grow up and think a bit" about a word.
My position is the same as yours, i.e. I am expressing my opinion on a message board.
The reason I hold that opinion is because offence is often avoidable and unnecessary, usually unfunny and, in this case, deeply distasteful ... as a moment's thought would tell anyone.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 71 guests
REPLY
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.
Use the FULL EDITOR to better format content or upload images, be notified of replies etc...