Cronus wrote:
Keith wrote:
The circumcised glans is being unfairly portrayed here as some insensitive lump of dry flesh. However, although it might have become de-sensitised to its everyday environment when unaroused, just the act of touching one shortly after its finished its business an be enough to send its owner into all sorts of agonies. I therefore conclude that on the job it is just as good at sending pleasure signals to the brain as its uncircumcised counterpart.
This isn't a post in support of circumcision by the way, after all we don't have the benefit of self sufficiency in cottage cheese.
Only after finishing its business? You're missing out. Standing to attention or not, the sensation to me is almost the same thanks to the foreskin protecting the nerve endings. If the foreskin is pulled back I can't walk anywhere, it's too sensitive.
I therefore conclude that I get much better blow-jobs than you.
Charlie Sheen wrote:
A few of the lads I know have had to have it done for medical reasons and they say its one of the best things they've ever done, and would recommend every bloke has it done.
Why?
I think you misunderstood me slightly. The thrust of my point was that the after-ejaculation sensitivity proves the nerve endings are still there so work just as well during and post arousal, they just don't trouble themselves with trivial things like touching cloth.
And as for better blow jobs, I'm in my late forties and been married for 20 years - for your sake I feckin hope you do
