Re: Coalition to break? : Sat Aug 18, 2012 6:43 pm  

JerryChicken wrote: The defining factor of a civilised society ... Another very good post. And just to reiterate what I mentioned a couple of time: when this coalition came to power, it inherited growth and a stabilised employment situation. But then you get cretinous, factually incorrect bull like this, from privileged brats who wouldn't know what a proper day's work was if it stood up and hit them very firmly across their wobbly, spoilt faces.

JerryChicken wrote: The defining factor of a civilised society ... Another very good post. And just to reiterate what I mentioned a couple of time: when this coalition came to power, it inherited growth and a stabilised employment situation. But then you get cretinous, factually incorrect bull like this, from privileged brats who wouldn't know what a proper day's work was if it stood up and hit them very firmly across their wobbly, spoilt faces.

Re: Coalition to break? : Sat Aug 18, 2012 6:50 pm  

Mintball wrote: Another very good post. And just to reiterate what I mentioned a couple of time: when this coalition came to power, it inherited growth and a stabilised employment situation. But then you get cretinous, factually incorrect bull like this, from privileged brats who wouldn't know what a proper day's work was if it stood up and hit them very firmly across their wobbly, spoilt faces. I prefer a lie-in to hard work, it doesn't mean that when the time comes to work I don't work hard.

Mintball wrote: Another very good post. And just to reiterate what I mentioned a couple of time: when this coalition came to power, it inherited growth and a stabilised employment situation. But then you get cretinous, factually incorrect bull like this, from privileged brats who wouldn't know what a proper day's work was if it stood up and hit them very firmly across their wobbly, spoilt faces. I prefer a lie-in to hard work, it doesn't mean that when the time comes to work I don't work hard.

Re: Coalition to break? : Sat Aug 18, 2012 6:58 pm  

Mintball wrote:

Ah. That.

Nope. Still entirely relevant.

Whinging that someone had made a "death threat" against you is entirely relevant to the Twitter joke trial.

But it was aimed at me. It was meant to cause distress and was abusive because it labelled me a 'lover'.

Re: Coalition to break? : Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:01 pm  

Big Graeme wrote: I prefer a lie-in to hard work, it doesn't mean that when the time comes to work I don't work hard. Absolutely valid point. And I'm sure that's widespread. Less than 18 months ago, the Daily Mail carried an article boasting about how people in the UK now works more hours than our western European counterparts – it's apparently one of M Thatcher's greatest legacies. FFS.

Big Graeme wrote: I prefer a lie-in to hard work, it doesn't mean that when the time comes to work I don't work hard. Absolutely valid point. And I'm sure that's widespread. Less than 18 months ago, the Daily Mail carried an article boasting about how people in the UK now works more hours than our western European counterparts – it's apparently one of M Thatcher's greatest legacies. FFS.

Re: Coalition to break? : Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:03 pm  

Ajw71 wrote:

But it was aimed at me. It was meant to cause distress and was abusive because it labelled me a 'lover'.

You were distressed?

Re: Coalition to break? : Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:05 pm  

Mintball wrote:

Ah. That.

Nope. Still entirely relevant.

Whinging that someone had made a "death threat" against you is entirely relevant to the Twitter joke trial.

So it's relevant to MISQUOTE someone on RLFans is it?

i.e. make something up, post a quotation that they never made, LIE............

Just checking.

Re: Coalition to break? : Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:11 pm  

Maybe not on RL Fans but perfectly acceptable for this government apparently.

Re: Coalition to break? : Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:23 pm  

Mintball wrote:

You were distressed?

Nope but thats irrelevant. 'Comments which are meant to distress'

Saying you would start my slitting my throat and calling me a lover is clealy meant to distress.

No doubt you will now close down all discussion of the topic because I have destroyed you in argument and fallback on your precious rule 2.2 which is strangely enough interpreted extemely widely whilst the rest of the rules are interpreted extremely narrowly, especially with regards those who the moderators 'like' / agree with.

Re: Coalition to break? : Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:25 pm  

Hull White Star wrote:

Maybe not on RL Fans but perfectly acceptable for this government apparently.

What about the Labour government, who ran out of money. No blame whatsoever attaches to them does it?

They wouldn't be making cuts would they?

Re: Coalition to break? : Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:31 pm  

Ajw71 wrote:

What about the Labour government, who ran out of money. No blame whatsoever attaches to them does it?

They wouldn't be making cuts would they?

I'm talking of the lies and half truths. "The NHS is safe with us", "We will help those that need it the most". I don't recall Labour saying those things and doing the exact opposite.