Re: State Sponsored Slavery : Thu Nov 17, 2011 12:41 pm  

Anakin Skywalker's from this "real world" that keeps being spoken of, doesn't sound too great to me.

Re: State Sponsored Slavery : Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:10 pm  

Anakin Skywalker wrote:

I want a job but can't get one, I will now stand even less chance than before as a job I could possibly get will now be given to someone that they don't need to pay.
Do you not understand this premise?
Some people are screaming out for work that they can't find, These jobs are clearly there or Tesco wouldn't be able to find work for these free jobs so why not employ folks who want to work for a proper wage?
Because they are greedy so-and-so's is why and the Government are bloody stupid or corrupt you decide.

You can add my vote to the 'corrupt' column.

[tb]

Re: State Sponsored Slavery : Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:17 pm  

You can be both corrupt and bloody stupid. Just saying …

Re: State Sponsored Slavery : Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:32 pm  

tb wrote:

You can be both corrupt and bloody stupid. Just saying …

Who mentioned the Maxwell brothers...?

Ah, Robert Maxwell - one fat Czech that didn't bounce.

Re: State Sponsored Slavery : Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:41 pm  

Seems there have been lots of jobs avaiable - its just the attitude of native people that stinks: http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/284 ... bs-a-month

Seems there have been lots of jobs avaiable - its just the attitude of native people that stinks: http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/284 ... bs-a-month

Re: State Sponsored Slavery : Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:45 pm  

Dally wrote: Seems there have been lots of jobs avaiable - its just the attitude of native people that stinks: http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/284 ... bs-a-month Figures for the three months to September - a time of year that traditionally sees an influx of temporary migrant labour, particularly in the agricultural sector - quoted in isolation to make a political, xenophobic point by the Express. Quelle surprise.

Dally wrote: Seems there have been lots of jobs avaiable - its just the attitude of native people that stinks: http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/284 ... bs-a-month Figures for the three months to September - a time of year that traditionally sees an influx of temporary migrant labour, particularly in the agricultural sector - quoted in isolation to make a political, xenophobic point by the Express. Quelle surprise.

Re: State Sponsored Slavery : Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:50 pm  

Andy Gilder wrote:

Figures for the three months to September - a time of year that traditionally sees an influx of temporary migrant labour, particularly in the agricultural sector - quoted in isolation to make a political, xenophobic point by the Express.

Quelle surprise.

Why is there a temporary influx this year when we have all these fit young people really keen on getting a job - "any job"?

Why do you discount facts that don't suit your slanted views?

Re: State Sponsored Slavery : Thu Nov 17, 2011 2:00 pm  

Andy Gilder wrote:

Who mentioned the Maxwell brothers...?

Ah, Robert Maxwell - one fat Czech that didn't bounce.

No, but given the circumstances of his demise, how apt that he was named "Bob"

Re: State Sponsored Slavery : Thu Nov 17, 2011 2:01 pm  

Dally wrote:

Why is there a temporary influx this year when we have all these fit young people really keen on getting a job - "any job"?

Because it is easier for the agriculture sector to attract immigrant labour for a short season that it is to recruit from the UK, the whole ballache of signing on and off and the length of time it takes to sort stuff like housing benefits at the end of the season do not make these short term roles attractive to UK residents. This is one area the Universal Benefit should help with, I can't see it though, people signing on and off are harder to manage that those signing on all the time.

Re: State Sponsored Slavery : Thu Nov 17, 2011 2:01 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

No, but given the circumstances of his demise, how apt that he was named "Bob"

Not unlike Natalie Wood...