Re: Circumcision - the cruelest cut? : Thu Aug 23, 2012 3:57 pm  

Cronus wrote:

Why?

It makes it grow bigger apparantly. Their girlfriends have confirmed this as well.

Re: Circumcision - the cruelest cut? : Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:33 pm  

Charlie Sheen wrote:

It makes it grow bigger apparantly. Their girlfriends have confirmed this as well.

Trimming your pubes makes it look bigger as well.

Please don't tell me your 'mates' believe this?

Re: Circumcision - the cruelest cut? : Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:47 pm  

Cronus wrote:

:lol:

Trimming your pubes makes it look bigger as well.

Please don't tell me your 'mates' believe this?

It actually grows bigger when standing to attention, it doesn't just look bigger from what they tell me, I've not seen the evidence myself but as I say a few people I know have said the same thing, and its been confirmed by their partners.

Re: Circumcision - the cruelest cut? : Thu Aug 23, 2012 5:12 pm  

Charlie Sheen wrote:

It actually grows bigger when standing to attention, it doesn't just look bigger from what they tell me, I've not seen the evidence myself but as I say a few people I know have said the same thing, and its been confirmed by their partners.

What utter rubbish. I've never, ever heard that before, not even from Americans or Jews - or anyone - who is fervently pro-circumcision. The foreskin rolls right back over the glans, it certainly doesn't prevent it blooming to its full potential, and losing it doesn't free up your Johnson to grow a little more!

I think your 'mates' are having you on.

After a quick spot of googling the only study I could find into this delicate matter was by Assistant Clinical Professor of Family and Community Medicine at the University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Dr. Christopher Fletcher, who actually found that the adult penis of men circumcised as children is 8mm (3/8″) shorter than those who are uncircumcised. So there.

I doubt there is any difference whatsoever. If anything, removing the foreskin would make the tip of the shaft a little narrower when erect.

Re: Circumcision - the cruelest cut? : Thu Aug 23, 2012 5:49 pm  

Mintball wrote:

.

There appear to be some claims that circumcision could reduce HIV infection, but that doesn't mean you have to have it done shortly after birth and couldn't wait to give the person chance to make their own decision when old enough.

.

I'm told by a couple of friends who had it done as adults (for medical reasons) that there are downsides to leaving it to later in life. To quote one "If'd had a gun when I woke up I would have shot it off, the pain was so bad".

Re: Circumcision - the cruelest cut? : Thu Aug 23, 2012 6:24 pm  

Cronus wrote:

What utter rubbish. I've never, ever heard that before, not even from Americans or Jews - or anyone - who is fervently pro-circumcision. The foreskin rolls right back over the glans, it certainly doesn't prevent it blooming to its full potential, and losing it doesn't free up your Johnson to grow a little more!

I think your 'mates' are having you on.

After a quick spot of googling the only study I could find into this delicate matter was by Assistant Clinical Professor of Family and Community Medicine at the University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Dr. Christopher Fletcher, who actually found that the adult penis of men circumcised as children is 8mm (3/8″) shorter than those who are uncircumcised. So there.

I doubt there is any difference whatsoever. If anything, removing the foreskin would make the tip of the shaft a little narrower when erect.

Maybe so. Don't really care either way. There're many religious practices that I disagree with, but I have no opinion on circumcision.

Re: Circumcision - the cruelest cut? : Thu Aug 23, 2012 6:34 pm  

The thought of it makes me wince.

Interestingly, and in contrast to attitudes in the States, at school I witnessed much mickey-taking at the expense of those who had been circumcised, or 'mushed' if I may indulge in the vulgar slang. In fact I remember there being a good 3-4 year period where accusing someone of 'having mush' was the most offensive thing you could say to another teenage boy.

Re: Circumcision - the cruelest cut? : Thu Aug 23, 2012 8:43 pm  

Neil wrote:

Bollox, only two refer to actual modern day crimes i.e. killing and stealing. There's no law prohibiting adultery and you can tell as many porkies as you like as long as you don't libel or slander anyone. The rest are all to do with religious observance.

I'm with George Carlin when it comes to the commandments...

[Durham Giant]

Re: Circumcision - the cruelest cut? : Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:32 pm  

Charlie Sheen wrote:

A few of the lads I know have had to have it done for medical reasons and they say its one of the best things they've ever done, and would recommend every bloke has it done.

I was 23 when i had it done and i can tell you 100% it reduces sensitivity and sex is not as good as it was.
For a lot of blokes they just see it as a fashion accessory like shaving their rubbish.

I would never recommend it unless it was absolutely neccesary.

When talking to a woman about it i used the analogy of her having one of her nipples cut off. It wont stop sexual pleasure but it will not be what it was.

Nothing makes me as angry as this it is loving barbaric. All this image of god stuff give the kids a beard and wear a dress and sandles if you want the kids to look like God

[Durham Giant]

Re: Circumcision - the cruelest cut? : Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:36 pm  

Charlie Sheen wrote:

It actually grows bigger when standing to attention, it doesn't just look bigger from what they tell me, I've not seen the evidence myself but as I say a few people I know have said the same thing, and its been confirmed by their partners.

Absolute loving poop. Maybe i have missed the bit on porn sites when they advertise how to make your cock bigger.

Make your cock bigger cut the sensitive bit off.

Your mates are wankers or loving thick,