rover49 wrote:
All sides were guilty of killings and other acts of violence, I suppose it depends on what side you take or outcome you wish to prevail as to whether its justified or not. Burning tyre's around peoples necks (thousands on their own people) were just as horrific as anything the white oppressive government did. A lot of innocents were killed by both side and knowing someone who was born & raised there, but now lives in the UK, the level of black on black violence is apparently not getting any better. Also, even after all these years of black majority rule, the average poor black South African doesn't appear to be any better off than before.
There is corruption and violence in all society's so you need to be very careful of lumping the necklacing of innocent people with the aims of the Anti-apartheid movement.
I visited South Africa on a Rugby Tour in 2010 and took a tour to Robin Island prison. We were shown round by a former inmate. His crime, firing a rocket propelled grenade at a petrol tanker. It didn't go off. He got a life sentence for that. Why did he fire it? His pregnant girlfriend was killed by security forces enforcing apartheid.
Now that to me has got nothing to do with what kind of violent society South Africa is today or old tribal scores being settled.
Most politicians are in it for what they can get, it just varies in the level of corruption depending what part of the world you live in.
And quite a few are genuine. Whether you can be genuine and not be a bit of a swine and assume power is an interesting question. Chavez may have lined his own pockets (I don't know if he did or he didn't) but whatever his faults I reckon his country and people are far better off than had the kind of pro-USA administration the US leadership wanted been installed instead.