Re: Circumcision - the cruelest cut? : Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:38 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/dick-cutter/2b/210/420 Well, that is quite the equipment is it not! I'll let you know when my face had finished wincing from watching THAT video.

Ferocious Aardvark wrote: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/dick-cutter/2b/210/420 Well, that is quite the equipment is it not! I'll let you know when my face had finished wincing from watching THAT video.

Re: Circumcision - the cruelest cut? : Thu Aug 23, 2012 11:14 pm  

Some truly great comments.

Jesus lopped his off and so one of the birds he had on the go could wear it round her finger, I don't know how she stretched it around Saturn though?

Is it only the Jewish who let their Rabbi's suck the blood off?

Re: Circumcision - the cruelest cut? : Thu Aug 23, 2012 11:17 pm  

It definitely should be illegal for parents to have their boys circumcised for religious reasons; would they be allowed to cut a child's ear off for religious reasons? The only grounds to have the procedure carried out on kids should be medical. If an adult male wants the procedure carried out in later life then that's entirely up to them.

Re: Circumcision - the cruelest cut? : Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:19 am  

Durham Giant wrote:

I was 23 when i had it done and i can tell you 100% it reduces sensitivity and sex is not as good as it was.
For a lot of blokes they just see it as a fashion accessory like shaving their rubbish.

I would never recommend it unless it was absolutely neccesary.

When talking to a woman about it i used the analogy of her having one of her nipples cut off. It wont stop sexual pleasure but it will not be what it was.

Nothing makes me as angry as this it is loving barbaric. All this image of god stuff give the kids a beard and wear a dress and sandles if you want the kids to look like God

Re: Circumcision - the cruelest cut? : Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:22 am  

Sheldon wrote: Some truly great comments. Jesus lopped his off and so one of the birds he had on the go could wear it round her finger, I don't know how she stretched it around Saturn though? Is it only the Jewish who let their Rabbi's suck the blood off? It's in the Talmud, apparently. And it does not appear to be the universal way of removing the blood.

Sheldon wrote: Some truly great comments. Jesus lopped his off and so one of the birds he had on the go could wear it round her finger, I don't know how she stretched it around Saturn though? Is it only the Jewish who let their Rabbi's suck the blood off? It's in the Talmud, apparently. And it does not appear to be the universal way of removing the blood.

Re: Circumcision - the cruelest cut? : Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:28 am  

Mintball wrote: It's in the Talmud, apparently. And it does not appear to be the universal way of removing the blood. I'd be very wary of a Rabbi who refused to use the tube, even more wary of one who didn't use the mouth wash. http://www.naturalnews.com/035192_circu ... itual.html

Mintball wrote: It's in the Talmud, apparently. And it does not appear to be the universal way of removing the blood. I'd be very wary of a Rabbi who refused to use the tube, even more wary of one who didn't use the mouth wash. http://www.naturalnews.com/035192_circu ... itual.html

Re: Circumcision - the cruelest cut? : Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:43 am  

Eek.

Re: Circumcision - the cruelest cut? : Fri Aug 24, 2012 12:42 pm  

Can a woman tell the difference between a chopper that has been circumsised as opposed to one that hasn't during sex ? That might sound a daft/dumb question but I can't help but ask.

Re: Circumcision - the cruelest cut? : Fri Aug 24, 2012 4:29 pm  

Not that I am aware of. But there's a lot more to sex than penetration.

In my experience, there is a difference in sensitivity for the man.

The frenulum on an uncut male is far more sensitive.

Re: Circumcision - the cruelest cut? : Mon Sep 03, 2012 1:09 am  

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/circ ... 5432IvveMI Rabbi David Niederman, executive director of the United Jewish Organization of Williamsburg, said no one will comply with the law, even if it’s passed. Religious freedom eh?

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/circ ... 5432IvveMI Rabbi David Niederman, executive director of the United Jewish Organization of Williamsburg, said no one will comply with the law, even if it’s passed. Religious freedom eh?