If the world was created by god can you please tell me, without linking to a youtube vid of some random blogger, how 2 penguins managed to walk from Antarctica, to the Ark, without falling off the egde of the earth and without sat nav
Regards
King james
Penguins can swim. The message from Noah to swim towards the Ark was conveyed by an albatross. They just followed the albatross back to the Ark. It's important to realise that Noah was fluent in both albatross and penguin. Next!
Penguins can swim. The message from Noah to swim towards the Ark was conveyed by an albatross. They just followed the albatross back to the Ark. It's important to realise that Noah was fluent in both albatross and penguin. Next!
You fool. Penguins can fly, they just choose not to, much like myself.
This thread was split off from the Astronomy thread because it was deemed to be detracting from its coherency. Yet people seem to have no issues whatsoever with turning it into an unreadable quagmire.
I was holding out on the folorn hope that I wouldn't have to intervene in the same manner that I was forced into doing with the Unmediated History thread.
Although after ten years of dealing with you muppets I really should have known better.
After mulling it over during the weekend I think it's probably best that I draw up a list of names who contribute absolutely nothing to this forum and move them on. To be honest it's long overdue.
If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters. This struggle may be a moral one; or it may be a physical one; or it may be both moral and physical; but it must be a struggle.
By coincidence, I was watching a Discovery prog the other night, "Apollo 17: The Untold Story of the Last Men on the Moon" and one of the tasks for the astronauts on that mission was to travel to and examine "moving boulders" which they did. I then went on the official NASA image repository where you can access every image taken and there are some fascinating shots.
For example, here is a comment re "the split boulder" as it came to be referred to:
the trails, like those they'd seen the previous day at the South Massif, consisted of chains of crater-like depressions and linear gouges carved out by the boulders as they bounced, tumbled, and slid downhill. The split boulder lay just below a noticeable break in slope and, evidently, had hit with considerable force and had broken and then slid a short way before coming to rest. In detail, it had broken into five pieces, with the largest of them being roughly six to ten meters on a side. https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/a17.summary.html
Astronaut Cernan also managed to break one of the wheel "mudguards" and harking back to issues discussed on this thread earlier, this was potentially a calamitous issue because the astronauts would be covered in dust and overheat, so either it had to be fixed or the rover was out of action. One very interesting shot was that the astronauts kit included what looked like a large paintbrush, which was specifically for brushing moondust off each other.
As the crew slept, NASA devised a temporary replacement mudguard, and in the morning the astronauts fitted this, using a map, two clamps and duct tape, and it worked so they could continue their driving.
Also it turns out that, 43 years before the recent detection, Apollo 17 had taken with them a gravitational wave detector. Sadly after much effort, it didn't in the event work, but that was the plan.
Broken mudguard repair - non-working gravitational wave detector - simple facts? Or super-devious invented sub-plot cameos to embellish a hoax? Either way, I should think all sides of the thread would find the programme highly fascinating and I recommend it.
Mugwump wrote:
Bigger versions of the image I posted earlier.
Bear in mind this is 1967
By coincidence, I was watching a Discovery prog the other night, "Apollo 17: The Untold Story of the Last Men on the Moon" and one of the tasks for the astronauts on that mission was to travel to and examine "moving boulders" which they did. I then went on the official NASA image repository where you can access every image taken and there are some fascinating shots.
For example, here is a comment re "the split boulder" as it came to be referred to:
the trails, like those they'd seen the previous day at the South Massif, consisted of chains of crater-like depressions and linear gouges carved out by the boulders as they bounced, tumbled, and slid downhill. The split boulder lay just below a noticeable break in slope and, evidently, had hit with considerable force and had broken and then slid a short way before coming to rest. In detail, it had broken into five pieces, with the largest of them being roughly six to ten meters on a side. https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/a17.summary.html
Astronaut Cernan also managed to break one of the wheel "mudguards" and harking back to issues discussed on this thread earlier, this was potentially a calamitous issue because the astronauts would be covered in dust and overheat, so either it had to be fixed or the rover was out of action. One very interesting shot was that the astronauts kit included what looked like a large paintbrush, which was specifically for brushing moondust off each other.
As the crew slept, NASA devised a temporary replacement mudguard, and in the morning the astronauts fitted this, using a map, two clamps and duct tape, and it worked so they could continue their driving.
Also it turns out that, 43 years before the recent detection, Apollo 17 had taken with them a gravitational wave detector. Sadly after much effort, it didn't in the event work, but that was the plan.
Broken mudguard repair - non-working gravitational wave detector - simple facts? Or super-devious invented sub-plot cameos to embellish a hoax? Either way, I should think all sides of the thread would find the programme highly fascinating and I recommend it.
This post contains an image, if you are the copyright owner and would like this image removed then please contact support@rlfans.com
I've just finished Judy Woods book. Wow a total fascinating read. 9/11 Free Falling. By Tom Petty The Truth is out there read Judy Woods book, then make your mind own mind up. instead of the mainstream making it up for you.Where Did The Towers Go Mind changing.
I've just finished Judy Woods book. Wow a total fascinating read. 9/11 Free Falling. By Tom Petty The Truth is out there read Judy Woods book, then make your mind own mind up. instead of the mainstream making it up for you.Where Did The Towers Go Mind changing.
I've just finished Judy Woods book. Wow a total fascinating read. 9/11 Free Falling. By Tom Petty The Truth is out there read Judy Woods book, then make your mind own mind up. instead of the mainstream making it up for you.Where Did The Towers Go Mind changing.
$50 a book! There's money in them there conspiracy theories!
Don't you see it Stanley? These 'experts' are profiteering from folk like you who swallow their crap. Those YouTube videos are merely commercials for their expensive books, plus if they get enough hits they might make a bit of spare change from the advertising revenue.
FLAT STANLEY wrote:
I've just finished Judy Woods book. Wow a total fascinating read. 9/11 Free Falling. By Tom Petty The Truth is out there read Judy Woods book, then make your mind own mind up. instead of the mainstream making it up for you.Where Did The Towers Go Mind changing.
$50 a book! There's money in them there conspiracy theories!
Don't you see it Stanley? These 'experts' are profiteering from folk like you who swallow their crap. Those YouTube videos are merely commercials for their expensive books, plus if they get enough hits they might make a bit of spare change from the advertising revenue.
$50 a book! There's money in them there conspiracy theories!
Don't you see it Stanley? These 'experts' are profiteering from folk like you who swallow their crap. Those YouTube videos are merely commercials for their expensive books, plus if they get enough hits they might make a bit of spare change from the advertising revenue.
Well if YOU 'D rather spend £250.00 on a pesky outdoor coat rather than spend a small amount of cash on an enlightened read thats your prerogative $39USD , you could read it on your summer jolly's i'd recommend this book. Obviously you're vanity massages your egotistic materialism which comes before truth. Hey don't worry thats how society is these days social engineering has worked a treat on you.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests
REPLY
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.
Use the FULL EDITOR to better format content or upload images, be notified of replies etc...