Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Fri Feb 26, 2016 5:14 pm  

Yes, it all makes perfect sense. An hour or two after the planes collided, "they" managed to bring down the buildings with an alien death ray (sorry, my bad "Directed Energy Weapon"). presumably, they needed to test this on real live people instead of in secret at some remote base.

Before this, I tended to the view that the Towers were brought down by long strings being pulled through the flat earth by the reptilian shapeshifters, but now the death ray sounds very much like the most likely explanation, so I don't need to buy the book.

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Fri Feb 26, 2016 5:15 pm  

To be fair to Judy Wood - the book wasn't published as popular science with a Reader's Digest serialization. It's an academic textbook - hence the colossal number of references, a proper bibliography etc.

When I finished at John Moores academic textbooks were running anywhere up to £50 each. By comparison Judy's book is very well priced.

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Mon Feb 29, 2016 4:32 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

Yes, it all makes perfect sense. An hour or two after the planes collided, "they" managed to bring down the buildings with an alien death ray (sorry, my bad "Directed Energy Weapon"). presumably, they needed to test this on real live people instead of in secret at some remote base.

Before this, I tended to the view that the Towers were brought down by long strings being pulled through the flat earth by the reptilian shapeshifters, but now the death ray sounds very much like the most likely explanation, so I don't need to buy the book.

To be honest Dr Woods has never said who was responsible. I thought you were Science mad so this book should float your boat bigtime. She has presented a lot of researched evidence, with hundreds of unseen photographs which are bizarre and much of this has never been unreported anywhere else. She seems to be a serious and sincere scientific researcher who is suggesting that there are Tesla based weapons that were covertly used to bring down the towers...and offers a lot of evidence that points to this. Why is it that she is being dismissed by some sections of the truth movement baffles me

I have the book and have read it. I wonder how many people who dis her have actually examined her book?

She is intelligent enough to strategically avoid finger pointing (for fear of being labelled by the mainstream) as to who did it...she is simply looking at the evidence with a scientific approach.

Keep an open mind...or some of you are no better than the stubborn masses who still believe the ridiculous and absurd official story. No doubt you'll continue to cherry pick Science's that fits your CGI fetish.and won't accommodate any other science that doesn't.

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Mon Feb 29, 2016 10:34 pm  

She's as batshit loony as you. Well maybe not quite since maybe she's making a few bob from conning delusional anxious to buy into another mad delusion. It's risible and not worth a second more of my time.

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Tue Mar 01, 2016 4:25 pm  

So you are not going to read the book you've just criticised?

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Tue Mar 01, 2016 6:11 pm  

Mugwump wrote:

So you are not going to read the book you've just criticised?

Another triple-smiley, wow, that IS impressive. But no, absolutely I'm not, life's too short to waste on that type of sensationalist drivel. I would view anyone who was prepared to consider as a possibility that the Towers were deliberately demolished by secret energy death ray weapons as a sandwich short of a picnic. It's self-evident batshittery of the highest order.

If you want to give patent and arrant nonsense an equal shot with reasonable debate that's your prerogative.

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Wed Mar 02, 2016 10:57 am  

While filming war criminal and mass murderer George Bush Sr's visit to NASA control Centre, the camera man caught a screen with Actornaught and traitor Tim Peake being filmed in front of a green screen to fake another ISS scene. The ISS Fraud. Caught Red Handed

While filming war criminal and mass murderer George Bush Sr's visit to NASA control Centre, the camera man caught a screen with Actornaught and traitor Tim Peake being filmed in front of a green screen to fake another ISS scene. The ISS Fraud. Caught Red Handed

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Wed Mar 02, 2016 11:55 am  

FLAT STANLEY wrote: While filming war criminal and mass murderer George Bush Sr's visit to NASA control Centre, the camera man caught a screen with Actornaught and traitor Tim Peake being filmed in front of a green screen to fake another ISS scene. The ISS Fraud. Caught Red Handed Few things wrong with your statement. There is no green screen present. I'm presuming you mean a Chroma key, to help put in false backgrounds. Chroma keys have to be one single colour, which the screen behind Peake is not. It would also have to encompass the whole viewing area, which it doesn't. The second thing wrong, is that the screen behind is a background measurement grid to track movement and accurately measure it. The third thing is, Peake was doing this with a school in London about motion in space and was filmed by the BBC at the school's end. You see, when critical and sound thinking is applied, rather than jumping to conclusions and ignoring the reality it isn't proof of anything. Although, the poster of the video and a number of super-excited but ultimately biased supporters have literally just ignored the obvious.

FLAT STANLEY wrote: While filming war criminal and mass murderer George Bush Sr's visit to NASA control Centre, the camera man caught a screen with Actornaught and traitor Tim Peake being filmed in front of a green screen to fake another ISS scene. The ISS Fraud. Caught Red Handed Few things wrong with your statement. There is no green screen present. I'm presuming you mean a Chroma key, to help put in false backgrounds. Chroma keys have to be one single colour, which the screen behind Peake is not. It would also have to encompass the whole viewing area, which it doesn't. The second thing wrong, is that the screen behind is a background measurement grid to track movement and accurately measure it. The third thing is, Peake was doing this with a school in London about motion in space and was filmed by the BBC at the school's end. You see, when critical and sound thinking is applied, rather than jumping to conclusions and ignoring the reality it isn't proof of anything. Although, the poster of the video and a number of super-excited but ultimately biased supporters have literally just ignored the obvious.

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Wed Mar 02, 2016 12:23 pm  

TheButcher wrote: Few things wrong with your statement. There is no green screen present. I'm presuming you mean a Chroma key, to help put in false backgrounds. Chroma keys have to be one single colour, which the screen behind Peake is not. It would also have to encompass the whole viewing area, which it doesn't. The second thing wrong, is that the screen behind is a background measurement grid to track movement and accurately measure it. The third thing is, Peake was doing this with a school in London about motion in space and was filmed by the BBC at the school's end. You see, when critical and sound thinking is applied, rather than jumping to conclusions and ignoring the reality it isn't proof of anything. Although, the poster of the video and a number of super-excited but ultimately biased supporters have literally just ignored the obvious. Wrong again. As this video explains the chequered background. Tim Peakes the Actor. Blue chequered screens provided by Orad Visual Set Technology Seen below. You see, when critical and sound thinking is applied, rather than jumping to conclusions and ignoring the reality the truth is there in plain site

TheButcher wrote: Few things wrong with your statement. There is no green screen present. I'm presuming you mean a Chroma key, to help put in false backgrounds. Chroma keys have to be one single colour, which the screen behind Peake is not. It would also have to encompass the whole viewing area, which it doesn't. The second thing wrong, is that the screen behind is a background measurement grid to track movement and accurately measure it. The third thing is, Peake was doing this with a school in London about motion in space and was filmed by the BBC at the school's end. You see, when critical and sound thinking is applied, rather than jumping to conclusions and ignoring the reality it isn't proof of anything. Although, the poster of the video and a number of super-excited but ultimately biased supporters have literally just ignored the obvious. Wrong again. As this video explains the chequered background. Tim Peakes the Actor. Blue chequered screens provided by Orad Visual Set Technology Seen below. You see, when critical and sound thinking is applied, rather than jumping to conclusions and ignoring the reality the truth is there in plain site

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Wed Mar 02, 2016 12:28 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote: While filming war criminal and mass murderer George Bush Sr's visit to NASA control Centre, the camera man caught a screen with Actornaught and traitor Tim Peake being filmed in front of a green screen to fake another ISS scene. The ISS Fraud. Caught Red Handed So NASA go to all this trouble to fake the ISS, yet they don't have the intelligence to switch off the 'evidence' while the cameras are in? Come on Stan, admit you're on a wind up.

FLAT STANLEY wrote: While filming war criminal and mass murderer George Bush Sr's visit to NASA control Centre, the camera man caught a screen with Actornaught and traitor Tim Peake being filmed in front of a green screen to fake another ISS scene. The ISS Fraud. Caught Red Handed So NASA go to all this trouble to fake the ISS, yet they don't have the intelligence to switch off the 'evidence' while the cameras are in? Come on Stan, admit you're on a wind up.