Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Thu Mar 03, 2016 7:25 am  

FLAT STANLEY wrote:

That assumption is the your last line of defence.

"Defence"?? Against what? Stanley, the forum's very own Black Knight?

FLAT STANLEY wrote:

Wrong... I answered the Australia Moon perspective perfectly on another thread. My answer is disregarded without investigation

You know you eventually posted some utter nonsense about a lamp in a room, it was real headscratching drivel, when challenged on that particular gem, even you had no clue WTF you were saying. It did raise a good laugh, but was arrant nonsense.

FLAT STANLEY wrote:

.Wrong again....As I have already explained. I have a television package that requires a dish to receive the analogue data from Sky, which feeds to my Digital receiver which then transforms the analogue data to Digital which then feeds to....... The dish is just a posh aeriel and it doesn't point to space. Hahaha.

See this is you trolling, N*O*B*O*D*Y would be as stupid as to believe you're being serious.

FLAT STANLEY wrote:

... my WIFI Hub, which connects to my mates server through the internet and Boom i've got every channel going through the internet without Sky even knowing. .Hahaha Satellites my ass. £40 a year for 4 boxes.I ain't lying

Wait ... you now claim that you get Channels via an internet server! Do you even know what you mean from one minute to the next? Stan, we can all watch pirated content over the internet if we want to, poor lad.

FLAT STANLEY wrote:

Antarctica is completely cut off and out of bounds for anyone to investigate due to the treaty what governs all activity there. Nobody has ventured internally since Admiral Byrd did with the American military in the 1950's under Operation Deepfreeze. Nobody is allowed to venture inland only private coastal trips are permitted. I wonder why....

"Coastal"? So your "great ice wall" is in fact a "coast" that people can go on "trips" to? How does that work? How do these "private trips" get to Antarctica? You obviously know all about them, who runs them, and where do we book them?

It's encouraging, though, that today you do at least believe that there IS an Antarctica, and this is real progress Stan, unless you forget again later on.

Well done again for claiming that Byrd travelled "internally", you don't seem to grasp that he couldn't actually travel internally unless there was somewhere internal to travel to, but then I suppose it is hard to keep up with such grand delusions and you're bound to make such mistakes.

But, well done you for realising that when a person does venture into Antarctica, they'd be travelling "inland". As of course they would, seeing as it's at the south end of a globe. It would be good if you were somehow able to hang on to this moment of clarity.


Here's a trip photo for your consideration - a party of skiers arriving at the South Pole in 2009. CGI?



Amundsen-Scott permanent South Pole Base


Just for you, Stan, a map showing you where this really is:


To help you get your bearings, here's a view from space, courtesy of Apollo 17

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Thu Mar 03, 2016 9:49 am  

FLAT STANLEY wrote:

Antarctica is completely cut off and out of bounds for anyone to investigate due to the treaty what governs all activity there. Nobody has ventured internally since Admiral Byrd did with the American military in the 1950's under Operation Deepfreeze. Nobody is allowed to venture inland only private coastal trips are permitted. I wonder why....

Comedy gold Stan, comedy gold.

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Thu Mar 03, 2016 10:39 am  

Are there White Walkers at this Ice Wall? I like a good conspiracy theory but the Flat Earth one just seems a bit far-fetched.

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Thu Mar 03, 2016 10:42 am  

For a place no-one is allowed, it's a bit odd that you can even book a place on an expedition to ski to the South Pole itself. Here's a link, at the time of posting there is one place left. Cost US$128,000. http://www.icetrek.com/south-pole-new-r ... escription It must be hard to get people to pay that amount of money if there isn't a South Pole to actually go to. I mean, wouldn't the average customer be a tad pis.sed off about that?

For a place no-one is allowed, it's a bit odd that you can even book a place on an expedition to ski to the South Pole itself. Here's a link, at the time of posting there is one place left. Cost US$128,000. http://www.icetrek.com/south-pole-new-r ... escription It must be hard to get people to pay that amount of money if there isn't a South Pole to actually go to. I mean, wouldn't the average customer be a tad pis.sed off about that?

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Thu Mar 03, 2016 11:36 am  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote: :lol: "Defence"?? Against what? Stanley, the forum's very own Black Knight? You know you eventually posted some utter nonsense about a lamp in a room, it was real headscratching drivel, when challenged on that particular gem, even you had no clue WTF you were saying. It did raise a good laugh, but was arrant nonsense. See this is you trollingN*O*B*O*D*Y would be as stupid as to believe you're being serious. Wait ... you now claim that you get Channels via an internet server! Do you even know what you mean from one minute to the next? Stan, we can all watch pirated content over the internet if we want to, poor lad. Well done again for claiming that Byrd travelled "internally", you don't seem to grasp that he couldn't actually travel internally unless there was somewhere internal to travel to, but then I suppose it is hard to keep up with such grand delusions and you're bound to make such mistakes. But, well done you for realising that when a person does venture into Antarctica, they'd be travelling "inland". As of course they would, seeing as it's at the south end of a globe. It would be good if you were somehow able to hang on to this moment of clarity.: Here's a trip photo for your consideration - a party of skiers arriving at the South Pole in 2009. CGI? Amundsen-Scott permanent South Pole Base. Just for you, Stan, a map showing you where this really is:To help you get your bearings, here's a view from space, courtesy of Apollo 17 See this clown cannot debate without vitriolic Ad Hom abuse.. See my pearls of answers really get your cognitive dissonance super charging hence the keyboard flex and vex. We've been over and over these arguments before so why are you trolling and instigating trouble with your rather embarrassingly tirades. Now the Moon analogy again i explained and your still don't/won't/can't grasp the perspective because you're so vexed and closed minded to even contemplate it just like Dr Judy Wood book you criticise blindly before outweighing factual evidence. Here's an idiots guide to Moon Perspective to make you understand... With regards to my TV package, again you can't seem to grasp this fact. Theres hundreds of thousands of folk who have this subscription. Its not illegal and it certainly not piracy. Are you jealous your vexed reply suggests so. Satellites dishes are nothing more than an analogue glorified aerial period. Antarctica... Nobody yes nobody is allowed at the supposed geographical South Pole, So they have an imitation glass sphere'd ball object at a private location which isn't the real so called geographical south pole. Theres only so far you can venture in. Treaty regulations. Hard luck.you should research a bit harder. Now this what i find hilarious. CGI alert. The fake Blue Marble which is CGI, wheres the star constellations in the background.... No doubt you'll repeat more questions which i've proven before followed with more vitriol.

Ferocious Aardvark wrote: :lol: "Defence"?? Against what? Stanley, the forum's very own Black Knight? You know you eventually posted some utter nonsense about a lamp in a room, it was real headscratching drivel, when challenged on that particular gem, even you had no clue WTF you were saying. It did raise a good laugh, but was arrant nonsense. See this is you trollingN*O*B*O*D*Y would be as stupid as to believe you're being serious. Wait ... you now claim that you get Channels via an internet server! Do you even know what you mean from one minute to the next? Stan, we can all watch pirated content over the internet if we want to, poor lad. Well done again for claiming that Byrd travelled "internally", you don't seem to grasp that he couldn't actually travel internally unless there was somewhere internal to travel to, but then I suppose it is hard to keep up with such grand delusions and you're bound to make such mistakes. But, well done you for realising that when a person does venture into Antarctica, they'd be travelling "inland". As of course they would, seeing as it's at the south end of a globe. It would be good if you were somehow able to hang on to this moment of clarity.: Here's a trip photo for your consideration - a party of skiers arriving at the South Pole in 2009. CGI? Amundsen-Scott permanent South Pole Base. Just for you, Stan, a map showing you where this really is:To help you get your bearings, here's a view from space, courtesy of Apollo 17 See this clown cannot debate without vitriolic Ad Hom abuse.. See my pearls of answers really get your cognitive dissonance super charging hence the keyboard flex and vex. We've been over and over these arguments before so why are you trolling and instigating trouble with your rather embarrassingly tirades. Now the Moon analogy again i explained and your still don't/won't/can't grasp the perspective because you're so vexed and closed minded to even contemplate it just like Dr Judy Wood book you criticise blindly before outweighing factual evidence. Here's an idiots guide to Moon Perspective to make you understand... With regards to my TV package, again you can't seem to grasp this fact. Theres hundreds of thousands of folk who have this subscription. Its not illegal and it certainly not piracy. Are you jealous your vexed reply suggests so. Satellites dishes are nothing more than an analogue glorified aerial period. Antarctica... Nobody yes nobody is allowed at the supposed geographical South Pole, So they have an imitation glass sphere'd ball object at a private location which isn't the real so called geographical south pole. Theres only so far you can venture in. Treaty regulations. Hard luck.you should research a bit harder. Now this what i find hilarious. CGI alert. The fake Blue Marble which is CGI, wheres the star constellations in the background.... No doubt you'll repeat more questions which i've proven before followed with more vitriol.

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:10 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote:

glass sphere'd ball object

I take it 'glass sphere'd ball object' refers to the Ceremonial South Pole?

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:12 pm  

Stan have you heard of the Dunning-Kruger effect? I think this might apply to you. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

Stan have you heard of the Dunning-Kruger effect? I think this might apply to you. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:37 pm  

bandgeekmafia78 wrote:

Stan have you heard of the Dunning-Kruger effect? I think this might apply to you.

Hey thanks for that. I won't lower my aptitude to your level. However i used to think/believe in all mainstream bullshit like you until i researched a lot of phenomena which lead to a great awakening. Nice to see your assumption of a Dunning Kruger patient is blitzing you on the prediction league on the Salford forum.Hahahaha who's got Dunning Krugers again.

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:41 pm  

bandgeekmafia78 wrote: Stan have you heard of the Dunning-Kruger effect? I think this might apply to you. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

bandgeekmafia78 wrote: Stan have you heard of the Dunning-Kruger effect? I think this might apply to you. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

Re: NASA and Space general conspiracy discussions : Thu Mar 03, 2016 1:43 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote:

Hey thanks for that. I won't lower my aptitude to your level. However i used to think/believe in all mainstream bullshit like you until i researched a lot of phenomena which lead to a great awakening. Nice to see your assumption of a Dunning Kruger patient is blitzing you on the prediction league on the Salford forum.Hahahaha who's got Dunning Krugers again.

I don't believe in all mainstream bullshit; I just don't accept that the World is flat

With regards to the prediction league, I missed the first week. Lets see how we get on over the course of the season. I'm even giving you a head start