rumpelstiltskin wrote:
What utter nonsense...
rumpelstiltskin wrote:
...and perhaps point out that maybe the great British public is a tad ticked off with the financial and military cost of attempting to foist democracy on a clearly reluctant Middle East population. Parliament's vote simply reflected the consequences of previous Western Military excursions into this area based on false Intelligence.
In the words of our glorious leader, "I get that".
rumpelstiltskin wrote:
...There is also an increasing feeling that despite our natural and justified abhorrence of these Syrian War crimes, use of chemical weapons and the latest atrocity of a phosphorous bombing of a school, it's about time that the Arab league, Saudi, The Emirates et al, stepped up and dealt with what is entirely their regional problem...
If you mean via diplomatic pressure, I'm all for it.
If you mean militarily, I can't think of much worse.
rumpelstiltskin wrote:
...We, as a nation have shed enough blood on their behalf...
I suggest you read a bit of history.
We, as a nation, have caused far more than enough bloodshed already in the Middle East.
We should be staying out anyway ... the tediously vacuous reason that we "have shed enough blood on their behalf" doesn't come into it.
rumpelstiltskin wrote:
...And a moments google will show that as the Worlds only superpower, the USA has really no need from a military viewpoint, of any additional token efforts from any of its allies...
The US still needs allies, it can't fulfil its self-appointed role as global policeman alone as lack of assistance obviously limits its reach.
This vote demonstrates that they don't automatically get our assistance, "token" or otherwise.
The erroneously-termed "special relationship" is wound back several notches.
rumpelstiltskin wrote:
...The danger now is, that Syria's allies in lebanon may feel emboldened to launch similar attacks on Israel, and that can only end in massive retaliation from them.
As a result of the UK staying out of it?
A moment ago, you were saying that UK involvement would be a un-needed token effort, now you're saying the lack of it may embolden Lebanon?