Re: The witch-hunters : Fri Apr 18, 2014 3:56 pm  

Goodbye bigoted free speech denier.

Re: The witch-hunters : Fri Apr 18, 2014 6:12 pm  

Ajw71 wrote:

According to the dictionary definition of bigotry it could be.

Nice evasion. Any chance you could answer the actual question I asked?

Re: The witch-hunters : Fri Apr 18, 2014 6:38 pm  

Ajw71 wrote:

Goodbye bigoted free speech denier.

I am of course no such thing, but I do note that you acknowledge you are a bigot. Honest, at least.

If you were to explain in what actual way I am in your strange world "bigoted", that would be useful for reference.

Re: The witch-hunters : Fri Apr 18, 2014 6:44 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

I am of course no such thing, but I do note that you acknowledge you are a bigot. Honest, at least.

If you were to explain in what actual way I am in your strange world "bigoted", that would be useful for reference.

Oh what a shocker. He said 'Goodbye' and then re-appears a few hours later when he can't handle not having the final word.

Denying someone's right to be 'bigoted', even in their own heads? Dear me. Sounds like some kind of anti free speech, thought police type coercive society. I've heard North Korea is nice this time of year

Re: The witch-hunters : Fri Apr 18, 2014 8:18 pm  

Ajw71 wrote:

Oh what a shocker. He said 'Goodbye' and then re-appears a few hours later when he can't handle not having the final word.

Denying someone's right to be 'bigoted', even in their own heads? Dear me....

You are so stupid it isn't fair.

I wrote "Goodbye, bigot" never expecting you would agree you were one.

The point of it was for you to blurt back some defence as to how or why you are not a bigot, and then I planned to explain you MUST be a bigot according to YOUR definition, since you are intolerant of numerous things.

However, a certain level of wit and slow thought, probably Neanderthal or thereabouts, was required on your part for it to work.

I overestimated you.

Turning briefly to your puerile ramblings, I did not deny someone's right to be bigoted, I said I did not support someone being bigoted. Feel free to be as bigoted as you like in that head of yours. Why would someone who is opposed to bigotry SUPPORT you being bigoted, though? I would not support it one bit. Indeed, I would find it extremely unfortunate and regrettable. Is this too hard for you? Maybe you could get your dictionary out again, it could I suppose help.

Also I do not see that "having the final word" comes into it. Certainly not from my side. I will post for as long as I feel interested enough, thus exercising my right of free speech. If you don't say something else idiotic, or as another option which may be easier for you, if you post something too stupid to bother with, in either of those cases you are very welcome to "the last word", if that is what makes you happy.

Re: The witch-hunters : Fri Apr 18, 2014 9:06 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

I did not deny someone's right to be bigoted, I said I did not support someone being bigoted. Feel free to be as bigoted as you like in that head of yours.

Well yes you did....

"I don't even remotely support their "right" to be bigoted in their own heads".

So you do actually support the right for someone to be bigoted.

Which means that you have either:

1) Changed your opinion in the space of a few days; or

2) Incorrectly expressed your own opinions in your initial post.

The rest of your post is just claptrap which is not worthy of a substantive response.

Re: The witch-hunters : Fri Apr 18, 2014 10:03 pm  

Ajw71 wrote:

Well yes you did....

"I don't even remotely support their "right" to be bigoted in their own heads".

So you do actually support the right for someone to be bigoted.

FFS I said I don't support the right to be bigoted. That right sadly exists, otherwise there would be no right for me not to support, now would there, you thick friend?

Ajw71 wrote:

The rest of your post is just claptrap which is not worthy of a substantive response.

Translation: "I can't think of anything to say, but am too childish to know when to shut up".

Re: The witch-hunters : Fri Apr 18, 2014 10:10 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

FFS I said I don't support the right to be bigoted. That right sadly exists, otherwise there would be no right for me not to support, now would there, you thick friend?

Resorting to insults because you know you have been outsmarted.

Next time maybe your 'Goodbye' should actually mean goodbye. Save yourself getting too het up because someone challenges you on the internets

Re: The witch-hunters : Fri Apr 18, 2014 10:48 pm  

Ajw71 wrote:

.. Save yourself getting too het up because someone challenges you on the internets

The bigot doth protest too much, methinks. You really are a very silly boy. The idea of being challenged by you brings Denis Healey's dead sheep to mind.

But there I think I'll leave it, unless you improbably actual have any thoughts, as opposed to puerile nonsense.

Re: The witch-hunters : Wed Apr 30, 2014 7:53 pm  

Ajw71 wrote:

Goodbye bigoted free speech denier.

Would that be denier 15? I personally prefer sheer.