Re: Days sinceā€¦ : Mon Jan 31, 2022 7:52 pm  

Willzay wrote:

Another day, another public embarrassment for Nadine Dorris and the Conservatives.

Well she absolutely owned Sky News at tea time, Mark Austin was squirming and Sam Coates done himself no favours - good to see them on the backfoot, naughty lying news channel

Re: Days sinceā€¦ : Mon Jan 31, 2022 8:09 pm  

ColD wrote:

Well she absolutely owned Sky News at tea time, Mark Austin was squirming and Sam Coates done himself no favours - good to see them on the backfoot, naughty lying news channel

I guess that was the interview where she answered the questions that had not been asked. I think the interviewer was actually squirming with embarrassment at how dumb she was trying to be. The example being will he release the full Gray report once the Police have completed the investigations. The answer he had released the report, so he asked again and she still came back with the same answer to something she was not asked.
I guess you understand irony when you refer to lying considering that despite being asked if he was at the flat party he could not answer until someone told him if he was. I would also remind you that he stood up in Parliament and stated that there was no party in his flat when Cummins left despite the police investigating the said party. I guess de Pfeffel must be just a naughty lying PM.

Re: Days sinceā€¦ : Mon Jan 31, 2022 8:41 pm  

She was lame, vague and embarrassingly non-commital when interviewed on C4 News this evening.
She's hopeless.

Re: Days sinceā€¦ : Mon Jan 31, 2022 9:07 pm  

ColD wrote:

Well she absolutely owned Sky News at tea time, Mark Austin was squirming and Sam Coates done himself no favours - good to see them on the backfoot, naughty lying news channel

Christ you really need to have drunk the Kool Aid to interpret that car crash as "owning" anybody. Deary me.

Re: Days sinceā€¦ : Tue Feb 01, 2022 2:18 am  

ColD wrote:

Well she absolutely owned Sky News at tea time, Mark Austin was squirming and Sam Coates done himself no favours - good to see them on the backfoot, naughty lying news channel

Well she didnā€™t do too good with the Channel 4 interview where her true capabilities came to the fore.

Re: Days sinceā€¦ : Tue Feb 01, 2022 6:41 pm  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

I guess that was the interview where she answered the questions that had not been asked. I think the interviewer was actually squirming with embarrassment at how dumb she was trying to be. The example being will he release the full Gray report once the Police have completed the investigations. The answer he had released the report, so he asked again and she still came back with the same answer to something she was not asked.
I guess you understand irony when you refer to lying considering that despite being asked if he was at the flat party he could not answer until someone told him if he was. I would also remind you that he stood up in Parliament and stated that there was no party in his flat when Cummins left despite the police investigating the said party. I guess de Pfeffel must be just a naughty lying PM.

Not sure why your babbling on about Bojo, sky were caught lying - fact

Bojo is a liar, and should be gone - youā€™ve no need to keep flying the red flag at me. If you Labourites had a leader who had anything about him Iā€™d give you more credit - as things stand Iā€™d rather vote for the Monster Raving Loony Party than either of them

Re: Days sinceā€¦ : Tue Feb 01, 2022 7:11 pm  

I know the fact you believe in the party (pun intended) of de Pfeffel would make it impossible to support a party led by a man with more integrity in a little finger than the current incumbent. He lost his cool and just lashes out speaking even more untruths than usual.
I guess you just like to be lied to on a daily basis and treated like a mug for still backing the party that still supports him.

Re: Days sinceā€¦ : Tue Feb 01, 2022 7:51 pm  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

I know the fact you believe in the party (pun intended) of de Pfeffel would make it impossible to support a party led by a man with more integrity in a little finger than the current incumbent. He lost his cool and just lashes out speaking even more untruths than usual.
I guess you just like to be lied to on a daily basis and treated like a mug for still backing the party that still supports him.

They just want an entertainer as Prime Minister. People with dignity like Starmer won't cut it. We'll just have to hope the grown up portion of the country is even more of a majority next time to ensure they don't get back in again.

Re: Days sinceā€¦ : Tue Feb 01, 2022 8:23 pm  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

I know the fact you believe in the party (pun intended) of de Pfeffel would make it impossible to support a party led by a man with more integrity in a little finger than the current incumbent. He lost his cool and just lashes out speaking even more untruths than usual.
I guess you just like to be lied to on a daily basis and treated like a mug for still backing the party that still supports him.

Iā€™m not backing no-one, I live in an area that has been Labour for pretty much my lifetime until last time out - and in all honesty itā€™s the first time Iā€™ve voted conservative, purely because they wanted Brexit and thatā€™s what the people voted for - another fact

And as a union member Iā€™m putting coffers into the reds, unless itā€™s by default never put anything into the blues - Iā€™m certainly not russian

Starmer is never ever prime minister material, Bojoā€™s bluster at the time gave him a shot

Re: Days sinceā€¦ : Tue Feb 01, 2022 8:56 pm  

ColD wrote:

Iā€™m not backing no-one, I live in an area that has been Labour for pretty much my lifetime until last time out - and in all honesty itā€™s the first time Iā€™ve voted conservative, purely because they wanted Brexit and thatā€™s what the people voted for - another fact

And as a union member Iā€™m putting coffers into the reds, unless itā€™s by default never put anything into the blues - Iā€™m certainly not russian

Starmer is never ever prime minister material, Bojoā€™s bluster at the time gave him a shot

I think despite the double negative I would suggest the fact you voted Conservatives is a strong indication you probably backed them donā€™t you think.

You have to opt in to pay to Labour, the company I worked for donated to the Conservatives without asking our opinion. How the Brexit thing going enjoying your new freedoms and the 350m per week going to the NHS.