Re: Coalition For Marriage : Sun May 20, 2012 9:14 pm  

Dally wrote:

Been away for the w/e and just flicked though the last 20 pages or so. Sickened by the foul language and personal abuse written by the predictible elements.

And yet apparently you're not sickened by the vile homophobia displayed by the OP. Whist I have avoided insults towards the OP in this thread I certainly understand why others have done so given the stuff that he has posted.

Re: Coalition For Marriage : Sun May 20, 2012 10:23 pm  

Dally wrote:

Been away for the w/e and just flicked though the last 20 pages or so. Sickened by the foul language and personal abuse written by the predictible elements.

IMO it's to the credit of the 'usual suspects' that they respond in a way that betrays just how much they are sickened by the delusional and hate-filled ramblings of an arrogant shitheaded bigot.

Re: Coalition For Marriage : Mon May 21, 2012 12:03 am  

Dally wrote:

Been away for the w/e and just flicked though the last 20 pages or so. Sickened by the foul language and personal abuse written by the predictible elements.

You know, they were all perfectly polite until it was pointed out to them that they are doomed to burn in hell because a mythical forbear ate some fruit. After that I'd suggest the odd curse might be viewed as fcking irrelevant. I mean, how much worse than eternal hellfire can it get?

Re: Coalition For Marriage : Mon May 21, 2012 5:46 am  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

Dally wrote:

Been away for the w/e and just flicked though the last 20 pages or so. Sickened by the foul language and personal abuse written by the predictible elements.

You know, they were all perfectly polite until it was pointed out to them that they are doomed to burn in hell because a mythical forbear ate some fruit.

Not to mention the poster who was told that his wife is suffering with cancer for the same reason. Disgusting.

Re: Coalition For Marriage : Mon May 21, 2012 11:46 am  

Chief Stinkwort wrote:

IMO it's to the credit of the 'usual suspects' that they respond in a way that betrays just how much they are sickened by the delusional and hate-filled ramblings of an arrogant shitheaded bigot.

Where can I espy these hate-filled ramblings?

[tb]

Re: Coalition For Marriage : Mon May 21, 2012 12:06 pm  

cf this thread passim

Re: Coalition For Marriage : Mon May 21, 2012 7:38 pm  

kirkstaller wrote:

Already been done about 10 pages back

How about some NT misogyny then?

"Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be submissive, as also says the law.

And if they will learn anything, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is shameful for women to speak in the church."

Corinthians 34, 35

Re: Coalition For Marriage : Mon May 21, 2012 7:57 pm  

Neil wrote:

kirkstaller wrote:

Already been done about 10 pages back

How about some NT misogyny then?

"Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be submissive, as also says the law.

And if they will learn anything, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is shameful for women to speak in the church."

Corinthians 34, 35

That also works if you replace 'in the church(es)' with 'whilst the rugby is on'.

Re: Coalition For Marriage : Mon May 21, 2012 8:38 pm  

Neil wrote:

How about some NT misogyny then?

"Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be submissive, as also says the law.

And if they will learn anything, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is shameful for women to speak in the church."

Corinthians 34, 35

Women should have no teaching authority in a church. What is wrong with that, if that is what God demands?

Re: Coalition For Marriage : Mon May 21, 2012 8:58 pm  

kirkstaller wrote:

Women should have no teaching authority in a church. What is wrong with that, if that is what God demands?

Predictable answer, even with your selective interpretation. What's even more saddening is my mother-in-law would most likely agree with you, just like all those muslim women who seem all happy to demand their right to be oppressed.