You charge the taxpayer £X for managing the hospital, you make sure you spend (a lot) less than £X providing the service.
(look at the history of Independent Treatment Centres under the last government - contracts stipulated that the centres would be paid for a minimum number of procedures, whether they actually carried them out or not, so the NHS ended up paying private companies for operations that were never carried out)
AT THE RIPPINGHAM GALLERY .................................................................... ART PROFILE ................................................................... On Twitter ................................................................... On Facebook ...................................................................
You charge the taxpayer £X for managing the hospital, you make sure you spend (a lot) less than £X providing the service.
(look at the history of Independent Treatment Centres under the last government - contracts stipulated that the centres would be paid for a minimum number of procedures, whether they actually carried them out or not, so the NHS ended up paying private companies for operations that were never carried out)
Your bit in brackets highlights the perfectly ludicrous scenario of trying to make profit from healthcare, a rather unique industry where the provider, and wage-payer, does not know what is going to walk through the door in the next five minutes but has to be prepared and able to cope with armageddon within those five minutes.
Advice is what we seek when we already know the answer - but wish we didn't
I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full-frontal lobotomy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ kirkstaller wrote: "All DNA shows is that we have a common creator."
cod'ead wrote: "I have just snotted weissbier all over my keyboard & screen"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "No amount of cajolery, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party. So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin." - Aneurin Bevan
Your bit in brackets highlights the perfectly ludicrous scenario of trying to make profit from healthcare, a rather unique industry where the provider, and wage-payer, does not know what is going to walk through the door in the next five minutes but has to be prepared and able to cope with armageddon within those five minutes.
Which obviously makes a company that has so far managed to rack up year-on-year losses from running a designer "hospital" in Bath, the perfect vehicle to deliver superb A&E services and general healthcare in a hospital in Cambridgeshire. At least both are used to running at a loss, I can see the synergies
Your job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.
You could put the whole GDP into the NHS and it still would not be enough. Somehow you have to decide how best to use the resources available. This moral dilema will divide everyone on here and in country depending upon their personal circumstances.
It is possible to make profits from private hospitals where procedures are chosen, planned and financed appropriately, BUPA and Nuffield seem to make these work. However in a situation where you are obliged to undertake anything that makes things more difficult. A&E is an issue due to the abuses it suffers, how you stop that I am not sure but if people can wait 4 hours to be seen that doesn't seem to be an emergency?
Your job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.
You charge the taxpayer £X for managing the hospital, you make sure you spend (a lot) less than £X providing the service.
(look at the history of Independent Treatment Centres under the last government - contracts stipulated that the centres would be paid for a minimum number of procedures, whether they actually carried them out or not, so the NHS ended up paying private companies for operations that were never carried out)
But if £x is less than the hospital was costing previously this is a win win for all.
Advice is what we seek when we already know the answer - but wish we didn't
I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full-frontal lobotomy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ kirkstaller wrote: "All DNA shows is that we have a common creator."
cod'ead wrote: "I have just snotted weissbier all over my keyboard & screen"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "No amount of cajolery, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party. So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin." - Aneurin Bevan
Your job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.
I think it is pretty evident that the waste in the NHS is not clinical but administrational - these types of initiatives should help to improve this position.
Will that affect patient care - unlikely. The problem comes if you reduce the clinical side and keep all the admin then patient care suffers.
I think it is pretty evident that the waste in the NHS is not clinical but administrational - these types of initiatives should help to improve this position.
Do you really think those in the administration side are going to cut their own jobs? Really? What will get cut is patient care and frontline staff wages.
I think it is pretty evident that the waste in the NHS is not clinical but administrational - these types of initiatives should help to improve this position.
Will that affect patient care - unlikely. The problem comes if you reduce the clinical side and keep all the admin then patient care suffers.
In fact the NHS (and the public sector generally) has a lower manager/admin to 'coalface' workers ratio than the private sector.
And, despite the introduction of an artificial internal market by the 1979-1997 government, continued by the last Labour government, transaction costs are lower than in a private market between private companies. Administrative 'waste' is a myth … see the Commonwealth Fund report reference in the link below
A doctor blogs btw - 'administration' is a key part of clinical care: without records how do doctors, nurses, physios, etc know what to do?
Sal Paradise wrote:
I think it is pretty evident that the waste in the NHS is not clinical but administrational - these types of initiatives should help to improve this position.
Will that affect patient care - unlikely. The problem comes if you reduce the clinical side and keep all the admin then patient care suffers.
In fact the NHS (and the public sector generally) has a lower manager/admin to 'coalface' workers ratio than the private sector.
And, despite the introduction of an artificial internal market by the 1979-1997 government, continued by the last Labour government, transaction costs are lower than in a private market between private companies. Administrative 'waste' is a myth … see the Commonwealth Fund report reference in the link below
A doctor blogs btw - 'administration' is a key part of clinical care: without records how do doctors, nurses, physios, etc know what to do?
Advice is what we seek when we already know the answer - but wish we didn't
I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full-frontal lobotomy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ kirkstaller wrote: "All DNA shows is that we have a common creator."
cod'ead wrote: "I have just snotted weissbier all over my keyboard & screen"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "No amount of cajolery, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party. So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin." - Aneurin Bevan
In fact the NHS (and the public sector generally) has a lower manager/admin to 'coalface' workers ratio than the private sector.
And, despite the introduction of an artificial internal market by the 1979-1997 government, continued by the last Labour government, transaction costs are lower than in a private market between private companies. Administrative 'waste' is a myth … see the Commonwealth Fund report reference in the link below
A doctor blogs btw - 'administration' is a key part of clinical care: without records how do doctors, nurses, physios, etc know what to do?
Yeah but does that really happen in the real, real world?
tb wrote:
In fact the NHS (and the public sector generally) has a lower manager/admin to 'coalface' workers ratio than the private sector.
And, despite the introduction of an artificial internal market by the 1979-1997 government, continued by the last Labour government, transaction costs are lower than in a private market between private companies. Administrative 'waste' is a myth … see the Commonwealth Fund report reference in the link below
A doctor blogs btw - 'administration' is a key part of clinical care: without records how do doctors, nurses, physios, etc know what to do?
Yeah but does that really happen in the real, real world?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 117 guests
REPLY
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.
Use the FULL EDITOR to better format content or upload images, be notified of replies etc...