Re: Woolwich incident : Thu May 23, 2013 6:33 am  

cod'ead wrote:

Yasira Jaan ‏@YasiraJaan

Muslims view "Islamic" terrorists the same way most Christians view the Westboro Baptist Church..

Saw that on Twitter

Very true

Re: Woolwich incident : Thu May 23, 2013 6:40 am  

And the EDL response? EDL battle police in Woolwich I wonder if the idiot in Braintree will be charged with terrorist offences, after entering a mosque with a knife and petrol bomb?

And the EDL response? EDL battle police in Woolwich I wonder if the idiot in Braintree will be charged with terrorist offences, after entering a mosque with a knife and petrol bomb?

Re: Woolwich incident : Thu May 23, 2013 6:51 am  

Durham Giant wrote: a couple of good bits of analysis from the Beeb. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22624100 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22634095 in my mind there is a direct link between failures in policy towards Afghanistan and Iraq which directly have led to this situation. By going into afghanistan and not dealing with the situation there quickly it created a festering sore. The then atack on Iraq which was unneccessary meant that the west took there eye of the ball and meant that they had lost any moral or political justification for remaining in afghanistan and dragging out an unwinnable war. If the resources and time wasted on Iraq had been spent on afghanistan then the troops would have been home five years or more ago and the level of anger that we now see would not have been there which is the link drwan out in the second interview above. As I said before, the filth that have all but destroyed our society are giving them victimhood status and it's all our fault! The BBC is infested by scum and should be shut down.

Durham Giant wrote: a couple of good bits of analysis from the Beeb. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22624100 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22634095 in my mind there is a direct link between failures in policy towards Afghanistan and Iraq which directly have led to this situation. By going into afghanistan and not dealing with the situation there quickly it created a festering sore. The then atack on Iraq which was unneccessary meant that the west took there eye of the ball and meant that they had lost any moral or political justification for remaining in afghanistan and dragging out an unwinnable war. If the resources and time wasted on Iraq had been spent on afghanistan then the troops would have been home five years or more ago and the level of anger that we now see would not have been there which is the link drwan out in the second interview above. As I said before, the filth that have all but destroyed our society are giving them victimhood status and it's all our fault! The BBC is infested by scum and should be shut down.

Re: Woolwich incident : Thu May 23, 2013 6:53 am  

cod'ead wrote: And the EDL response? EDL battle police in Woolwich I wonder if the idiot in Braintree will be charged with terrorist offences, after entering a mosque with a knife and petrol bomb? Well, Essex man was first to reject Labour and turn to Thatcher for the sake of the country. Maybe Essex man could be the saviour of the UK again?

cod'ead wrote: And the EDL response? EDL battle police in Woolwich I wonder if the idiot in Braintree will be charged with terrorist offences, after entering a mosque with a knife and petrol bomb? Well, Essex man was first to reject Labour and turn to Thatcher for the sake of the country. Maybe Essex man could be the saviour of the UK again?

Re: Woolwich incident : Thu May 23, 2013 6:59 am  

Durham Giant wrote:

in my mind there is a direct link between failures in policy towards Afghanistan and Iraq which directly have led to this situation.

You've fulfilled Saddened's prediction already!

Don't put the blame anywhere else but where it belongs: at the feet of the two terrorists. This has nothing to do with government policy, nothing whatsoever. It has to do with two individuals who have chosen to hate and take out their hate on an innocent man (who has now been confirmed as a member of the armed forces).

Re: Woolwich incident : Thu May 23, 2013 7:04 am  

SaintsFan wrote:

You've fulfilled Saddened's prediction already!

Don't put the blame anywhere else but where it belongs: at the feet of the two terrorists. This has nothing to do with government policy, nothing whatsoever. It has to do with two individuals who have chosen to hate and take out their hate on an innocent man (who has now been confirmed as a member of the armed forces).

Not only that but if people have such grievances concern their lands (which no doubt they have never visited) what are they doing still living here? The UK does not stop people emigrating. If these people have convictions then they should live by them and bugger off. If they then wish to fight us so be it. But to live here and hate us then they are just hypocritcal, murderous scum.

[Durham Giant]

Re: Woolwich incident : Thu May 23, 2013 7:08 am  

SaintsFan wrote:

You've fulfilled Saddened's prediction already!

Don't put the blame anywhere else but where it belongs: at the feet of the two terrorists. This has nothing to do with government policy, nothing whatsoever. It has to do with two individuals who have chosen to hate and take out their hate on an innocent man (who has now been confirmed as a member of the armed forces).

But why have they become terrorists and what do you think needs to be done to stop more people becoming terrorists ?

Re: Woolwich incident : Thu May 23, 2013 7:08 am  

cod'ead wrote: And the EDL response? EDL battle police in Woolwich I wonder if the idiot in Braintree will be charged with terrorist offences, after entering a mosque with a knife and petrol bomb? I don't recall Catholic churches being attacked when the IRA were setting bombs off in London/Warrington etc. Maybe this lot have got the wrong end of the stick

cod'ead wrote: And the EDL response? EDL battle police in Woolwich I wonder if the idiot in Braintree will be charged with terrorist offences, after entering a mosque with a knife and petrol bomb? I don't recall Catholic churches being attacked when the IRA were setting bombs off in London/Warrington etc. Maybe this lot have got the wrong end of the stick

Re: Woolwich incident : Thu May 23, 2013 7:17 am  

Chris28 wrote:

I don't recall Catholic churches being attacked when the IRA were setting bombs off in London/Warrington etc. Maybe this lot have got the wrong end of the stick

Maybe because the Catholic church in Britain existed long before the IRA?

Re: Woolwich incident : Thu May 23, 2013 7:20 am  

Dally wrote:

Maybe because the Catholic church in Britain existed long before the IRA?

Are you saying that Islam didnt exist in the UK before Al Qaeda?