Re: The Guides : Tue Jun 25, 2013 12:18 am
Mintball wrote:
I didn't say that "WWII was influenced to any great extent by religion".
Try to read properly next time.
Try to read properly next time.
When you start talking sense I'll read it.
I am well aware of liberation theology. I am also well aware – and have pointed out more than once – that the Catholic hierarchy rejected it and, indeed, did sweet FA to challenge (or help priests on the ground) challenge Latin American fascism – unlike communist eastern Europe.
Indeed, there are questions about the new pope and whether he even shopped two priests with liberation theological stances to the dictatorship.
Indeed, there are questions about the new pope and whether he even shopped two priests with liberation theological stances to the dictatorship.
The Pope could have pulled the trigger himself - it would still be irrelevant. I stated that despite its many crimes the Catholic Church (along with other major religions, I might add), has also served as a socially beneficial agent. As evidence I introduced Liberation Theology, which has gained not just millions of followers but also praise across the globe (including America - the very nation it has fought bitterly against).
If you were genuinely interested in pursuing the truth you'd just agree and from thereon we might possibly have an intellectually stimulating discussion about what can only be described as a radical, not to mention - extremely encouraging, ecclesiastical development which is re-shaping South America for the better.
Instead you childishly attempt to muddy the waters by suggesting that because a handful of high-ranking Catholics in Rome threw a hissy fit, Liberation Theology and Catholicism are now on a completely different page. Which, no doubt, will come as a shock to the thousands of Argentinian, Chilean, Bolivian etc. priests who consider themselves Catholic, are based in Catholic churches, deliver Catholic mass three times each day etc.