Re: Historical sexual abuse charges... : Fri Mar 28, 2014 6:47 pm  

Come on Mr. Chicken, when you were first hanging out with your celebrity relative, you copped the odd feel.

It's a fair cop, we're all friends here, we've heard the stories about deodorant down the keck's in the scoreboard at Headingley.

Re: Historical sexual abuse charges... : Fri Mar 28, 2014 7:53 pm  

Sandra The Terrorist wrote:

Come on Mr. Chicken, when you were first hanging out with your celebrity relative, you copped the odd feel.

It's a fair cop, we're all friends here, we've heard the stories about deodorant down the keck's in the scoreboard at Headingley.

That was self abuse, to be tried for that I'd have to make a complaint against myself, unless any of the passengers on the top deck of that bus come forward.

Re: Historical sexual abuse charges... : Sat Mar 29, 2014 1:41 am  

Why do you never hear about flashers anymore?

Re: Historical sexual abuse charges... : Sat Mar 29, 2014 8:23 am  

wigan_rlfc wrote:

Why do you never hear about flashers anymore?

When was the last time you saw a decent quality long brown raincoat for sale in a shop ?

Theres your answer along with sock suspenders and thick bottle-bottom glasses, there just isn't the supply chain for flashers any more.

Re: Historical sexual abuse charges... : Fri May 02, 2014 3:03 pm  

Max Clifford has been jailed for 8 years

Re: Historical sexual abuse charges... : Fri May 02, 2014 3:50 pm  

From Newsthump: Convicted armed robber, Frank Murphy expressed his elation at the prospect of exchanging a manly fumble at Her Majesty’s behest for a huge paycheck under the guise of ‘news’. “Mr Clifford says he has nothing to hide – and if the rumours about the size of his penis are anything to go by – he would appear to be telling the truth,” he told us. “The thought of him bedding down for the evening beneath a cheap nylon blanket on a rock hard pillow doesn’t just fill the general public with a warm feeling – that extends to us cons too.” “To think that for the kind of invasion of privacy that he sought to exploit through his media interests could now be replicated by a troupe of hulking criminals for a large pot of honestly earned money, well.” “Let’s just say there are lots of fags being exchanged for vaseline as we speak.” Ouch! Full article: http://newsthump.com/2014/04/29/prison- ... -and-tell/

From Newsthump: Convicted armed robber, Frank Murphy expressed his elation at the prospect of exchanging a manly fumble at Her Majesty’s behest for a huge paycheck under the guise of ‘news’. “Mr Clifford says he has nothing to hide – and if the rumours about the size of his penis are anything to go by – he would appear to be telling the truth,” he told us. “The thought of him bedding down for the evening beneath a cheap nylon blanket on a rock hard pillow doesn’t just fill the general public with a warm feeling – that extends to us cons too.” “To think that for the kind of invasion of privacy that he sought to exploit through his media interests could now be replicated by a troupe of hulking criminals for a large pot of honestly earned money, well.” “Let’s just say there are lots of fags being exchanged for vaseline as we speak.” Ouch! Full article: http://newsthump.com/2014/04/29/prison- ... -and-tell/

Re: Historical sexual abuse charges... : Fri May 02, 2014 4:30 pm  

rob_a wrote:

Max Clifford has been jailed for 8 years

Is that 10 years for his vile, nasty story peddling with 2 years taken off for the stress of this stupid trial?

I haven't been watching his trial very much. Just the occasional story here and there. But from what I read it was all ridiculous nonsense. Supposedly showing his tiny penis and joking about how small it was while asking women to go to bed with him.

Anyone got an idea of the serious attack he's supposed to have done to get himself 8 years? I just hope he hasn't got 8 years for stupid nonsense like that ^^^^^. But I don't have that much faith in the British justice system so I wouldn't put it past them to give him a ridiculous sentence even without a serious assault.

Re: Historical sexual abuse charges... : Fri May 02, 2014 5:07 pm  

He was given 8 seperate sentences ranging from 6 months to 2 years. These are to be served consecutively

Re: Historical sexual abuse charges... : Fri May 02, 2014 6:25 pm  

Lord God Jose Mourinho wrote:

Is that 10 years for his vile, nasty story peddling with 2 years taken off for the stress of this stupid trial?

I haven't been watching his trial very much. Just the occasional story here and there. But from what I read it was all ridiculous nonsense. Supposedly showing his tiny penis and joking about how small it was while asking women to go to bed with him.

Anyone got an idea of the serious attack he's supposed to have done to get himself 8 years? I just hope he hasn't got 8 years for stupid nonsense like that ^^^^^. But I don't have that much faith in the British justice system so I wouldn't put it past them to give him a ridiculous sentence even without a serious assault.

No, for once they took an old list of allegations to trial with some actual evidence including a letter from one young woman who had written to him many years ago telling him how despicable she thought he was for what he did to her - rather stupidly he kept it in his bedside drawer for years and it was there when the police searched his home, presumably it was all part of how he got his kicks.

Re: Historical sexual abuse charges... : Fri May 02, 2014 6:39 pm  

rob_a wrote:

He was given 8 seperate sentences ranging from 6 months to 2 years. These are to be served consecutively

How often are sentences served consecutively? Isn't the normal practice to have all served at the same time? IMO it makes more sense to properly punish criminals for their crimes but as far as I was aware concurrent sentencing was how most people are dealt with.