Re: Coalition For Marriage : Wed May 23, 2012 4:26 pm  

Dally wrote: It seems I read better than you. What he actually said (my stresses) was: If you are interested in hearing more, or if you are willing to help, please visit: http://c4m.org.uk When you visit the site you can sign the petition and show your support for the existing definition of marriage. Oh, no you don't. This is not a bleedin' advertising pinboard. Flaunt your bigoted, homophobic views and expect to be challenged about it. Don't want a contrary view? Possibly not a great idea to post on a discussion forum, then.

Dally wrote: It seems I read better than you. What he actually said (my stresses) was: If you are interested in hearing more, or if you are willing to help, please visit: http://c4m.org.uk When you visit the site you can sign the petition and show your support for the existing definition of marriage. Oh, no you don't. This is not a bleedin' advertising pinboard. Flaunt your bigoted, homophobic views and expect to be challenged about it. Don't want a contrary view? Possibly not a great idea to post on a discussion forum, then.

Re: Coalition For Marriage : Wed May 23, 2012 4:31 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

Oh, no you don't. This is not a bleedin' advertising pinboard. Flaunt your bigoted, homophobic views and expect to be challenged about it.

Don't want a contrary view? Possibly not a great idea to post on a discussion forum, then.

The OP would be better off posting this kind of tripe on the Daily Mail board, then Dally could pick it up and run with it for him on here and the OP would be protected from intelligent, reasoned, fact based debate.

as it is, both are bigots

Re: Coalition For Marriage : Wed May 23, 2012 5:01 pm  

Standee wrote:

intelligent, reasoned, fact based debate.

...and where the heck was that!!??

Re: Coalition For Marriage : Wed May 23, 2012 5:52 pm  

Dally wrote:

As I noted above, he was simply and politely asking if like-minded people would like to express there opinion by way of a pettion. For that, he has been pilloried by the RLFans thought police - people who are so blinkered they think their display of rabid intolerance of the OP consitutes tolerance. You couldn't make it up as they say.

When he first posted a similar thread on southstander he asked if it would be ok to do so, my reply was that it was fine but his right to freedom of religious expression came with a caveat that he should expect to be challenged on his views in accordance with the personal abuse guidelines of these forums.

He accepted this and has replied to posts which question his beliefs, if he didn't want to be questioned he could very easily have deleted his own post or asked me to.

Personally I think his views are straight out of an asylum but I will honour his right to express them.

Re: Coalition For Marriage : Wed May 23, 2012 6:19 pm  

Quentin Tarantino weighs into the argument Well, not quite but Mr Blond (Philip Blond MP Con) does in a speech to Christian Concern. He even manages to label gay marriage as homophobic. The more I see and hear of these nutters, the more they appear to have totally lost the plot

Quentin Tarantino weighs into the argument Well, not quite but Mr Blond (Philip Blond MP Con) does in a speech to Christian Concern. He even manages to label gay marriage as homophobic. The more I see and hear of these nutters, the more they appear to have totally lost the plot

Re: Coalition For Marriage : Wed May 23, 2012 7:02 pm  

Dally wrote:

...and where the heck was that!!??

between kirkstaller posting and you dropping to your knees in agreement?

Re: Coalition For Marriage : Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm  

Dally wrote:

...and where the heck was that!!??

Well, not from you, sunshine.

Re: Coalition For Marriage : Wed May 23, 2012 8:33 pm  

cod'ead wrote: Quentin Tarantino weighs into the argument Well, not quite but Mr Blond (Philip Blond MP Con) does in a speech to Christian Concern. He even manages to label gay marriage as homophobic. The more I see and hear of these nutters, the more they appear to have totally lost the plot The second MP I've noted who appears to be taking this as an issue, instead of getting off his arris and fighting for his constituents jobs, health, education and security. Some heads need banging together.

cod'ead wrote: Quentin Tarantino weighs into the argument Well, not quite but Mr Blond (Philip Blond MP Con) does in a speech to Christian Concern. He even manages to label gay marriage as homophobic. The more I see and hear of these nutters, the more they appear to have totally lost the plot The second MP I've noted who appears to be taking this as an issue, instead of getting off his arris and fighting for his constituents jobs, health, education and security. Some heads need banging together.

Re: Coalition For Marriage : Wed May 23, 2012 8:44 pm  

Has anyone used Austin 3:16

"I just whipped your ass!"

Re: Coalition For Marriage : Thu May 24, 2012 5:31 am  

Is that MP in Coddys posts' argument really that equality harms a minority group? Presumably he also thinks that the abolishment of segregation in the US was harmful to black people and their "identity".

Ive also had a thought (yes, just the one!). Having re-read some of Kirkstaller and others posts...

Is God actually Ryan Bailey?

Does He do what He wants?