SaintsFan wrote:
'Facts surrounding' does not appear to be a trendy consideration on this thread, given that the 'facts surrounding' the closure of pits under Margaret Thatcher included such examples as her original intention to close only 20 loss making mines, Arthur Scargill taking the miners out on illegal strikes, moving monies abroad, etc, etc. Those are examples of facts but they do not seem to be taken into consideration when discussing this topic so why should I take any 'facts surrounding' the closure of mines under Wilson into consideration?
What an idiotic and quite frankly childish stance to stance to take. Whatever you believe happened with Scargill doesn't alter what happened under Wilson and why it happened. All you did, which you know you did, was pluck numbers off the Internet without bothering to look into it any further. It's no way to conduct a debate and just makes you look stupid. It's been pointed out in detail what the Wilson governments strategy was regarding the mining industry in this country and the difference between that and what Thatcher did is poles apart.