FORUMS FORUMS






RLFANS.COM
Celebrating
25 years service to
the Rugby League
Community!

   WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - taking less flights
::Off-topic discussion.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Star4641
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 25 201014 years198th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
17th Apr 24 17:4914th Mar 24 11:07LINK
Milestone Posts
2500
5000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
WF4
Signature
"Back home we got a taxidermy man. He gonna have a heart attack when he see what I brung him."

Re: taking less flights : Thu Jan 16, 2020 10:34 am  
Sal Paradise wrote:
its yet another rich-bashing exercise and the usual suspects on here have waded in.


Utter codswallop.

If there really is a serious climate emergency, and flights are contributing to it, EVERYONE is going to have to cut back.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Club Coach17880
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 24 201113 years47th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
14th Apr 24 18:2314th Apr 24 09:14LINK
Milestone Posts
15000
20000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530

Re: taking less flights : Thu Jan 16, 2020 12:59 pm  
Cronus wrote:
I'll be interested in hearing what this 'Flashman' has to say. In the meantime, I'll give my view.

All the government has done is defer payment of Flybe's APD bill, which was the crux of the issue in the first place. They're not throwing cash at them, though as part of the agreement Flybe's owners (including Virgin) will provide a relieving cash injection. Seems a reasonable outcome for a mostly viable airline - which many other the others lost recently weren't.

Sally - I can tell you now, "execs who see 'frequent travel' as a perk of the job" are few and far between. A cycle of airports, flights, taxis, hotels, meetings, conference, airports, flights, taxis, hotels gets VERY tiresome VERY quickly. Most of the time travel is a necessary evil. Those flying Business Class, taking limos and staying at top hotels might enjoy some of the perks, but the vast majority are in economy, taking taxis and staying in the cheapest reasonable standard hotel they can find, all the time counting the hours until they get home.

I do agree with you that people taking multiple flights a year is an issue. A 2-week holiday, a stag do, a weekend city break, Lapland at Xmas, and the rest. Some youngsters I know will 'do Ibiza' twice a summer. Of course some business flyers are equally guilty - I couldn't tell you how many flights I've taken for conferences and training courses across Europe and North America, most of which were not necessary at all. Some conferences can be useful, however I would certainly question the need for many.

And it's not just corporations. The volume of travel at universities and other academic institutions might surprise you. The biggest UK universities EACH spend between £10-14m a year on travel, of which approx £6-8m is on flights. Mid-sized universities are each spending £6-10m a year of which approx £3-6m is flights. There are a lot of universities. Is all of that 'necessary'?

The problem for businesses is that while Skype and the like have their place, in reality they deliver blo0dy awful and awkward meetings and there's a reason face-to-face remains the preferred option by a country mile.

Anyway back to Flybe. I'd have to check but I believe the nature of Flybe's smaller aircraft means they emit fewer GHGs per seat km than most commercial aircraft, certainly than older legacy aircraft. Airlines are working and investing as quickly as possible to decrease their carbon footprint, from using biofuels to hybrid or fully electric engines, electric airport vehicles, carbon offsetting programmes, carbon-neutral HQs and other initiatives, they know they need to improve enormously or face a backlash - which has already been seen in low numbers in some Scandi countries.

But there's a very long way to go and in the meantime if we're serious about emissions we need to ask whether the perpetual drive for economic growth is a positive, as it means more aircraft, more routes, ever expanding airports and all their associated emissions. Similarly, do we simply allow more and more leisure routes? My belief is airline routes must at some point be limited and schemes to limit and punish frequent flyers introduced. An steeply increasing FF tax for each flight taken in a year, for example.

Flybe are a pretty small airline but for those who use them, they are essential. They fly to and between destinations not available with most other carriers. For a short period I had to travel to Southampton a couple of times a month. Flybe were a godsend. I've also used them to overseas destinations not available by air from my departure point with anyone else. For those who rely on Flybe, they are more important than Thomas Cook. TUI and Jet2 and the rest are filling Thomas Cook's shoes (just as they did with Monarch) whereas the loss of Flybe would leave a damaging void in many areas.

And it's not just flying between small destinations - they also provide connectivity into some key international hubs, with onward codeshare agreements on some major international scheduled carriers. Other regional airlines have been lost in recent years, it makes sense to retain Flybe if possible.


What will become interesting, over the term of the current Parliament, is whether The Tories actually take climate change seriously.
The major difficulty is that ANY government is always trying to be in a position to win the next election, thinking only about working "for the next 5 years" and as such, the difficult decisions to help reduce our carbon emissions will always be overlooked, in favour of securing an election victory.

IMO there is absolutely no doubt that the climate emergency will only be properly addressed when it's too late (bit of a contradiction there) and people like Trump and Johnson have no intention of making the difficult choices.

We need to breed less and consume less and better protect the worlds resources but, unfortunately, Capitalism ALWAYS wins.

It will be interesting to see just where things are at the turn of the next century, perhaps by then we will have found a new planet to inhabit ?
RankPostsTeam
International Star1100No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
May 25 201113 years234th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
2nd Oct 23 17:392nd Oct 23 14:04LINK
Milestone Posts
1000
2500
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530

Re: taking less flights : Thu Jan 16, 2020 1:21 pm  
The tories won’t take climate change seriously, Donald trump won’t let them. :D

Of course business will continue to fly, you cannot grease palms on skype and FaceTime. :D
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Club Coach16252
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 12 200420 years60th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
14th Apr 24 17:4527th Feb 24 19:53LINK
Milestone Posts
15000
20000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Signature
Challenge Cup winners 2009 2010 2012 2019
League Leaders 2011 2016

Re: taking less flights : Thu Jan 16, 2020 5:06 pm  
Sal Paradise wrote:
People especially families go abroad for two reasons - the weather and cost. Two week in a hotel with a pool in the Lake district would be financially prohibitive - Centre parcs anyone!! The weather is very unpredictable too and anyone who has had kids nothing worse than miserable kids on what is supposed to be the highlight of their year.

I agree about business flights - many are completely unnecessary - but if you want to win work - Skype simply doesn't cut it. Its OK for internal communications and updates but that's it.


How did Britons ever cope before being able to take their holidays in Aya Napa :lol:

The point I'm making is not that businesses should never fly, but to disincentivise the unnecessary ones.

Cronus' point about universities is a case in point, and sums up my gripe about people going to 'conferences'. I bet a lot of academics travel is on these conference rubbish. It's all about 'prestige' in 'presenting a paper' at a foreign location. All they do is give a powerpoint about their research, then you get a panel session of self-important experts pontificating on some topic before everyone goes away and eats the buffet lunch and does networking, ie hobknobbing with someone they want to suck up to, or chatting someone up while their wife is safely back home.

At least our carbon footprint discussing this issue on rlfans is pretty low. You can guarantee there are some climate change academics flying around the world to talk about this same issue at a conference.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Board Member18060No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 27 200222 years300th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
11th Jun 23 20:4411th Jun 23 20:53LINK
Milestone Posts
15000
20000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
On the road
Signature
Your job is to say to yourself on a job interview does the hiring manager likes me or not. If you aren't a particular manager's cup of tea, you haven't failed -- you've dodged a bullet.

Re: taking less flights : Fri Jan 17, 2020 1:09 pm  
sally cinnamon wrote:
How did Britons ever cope before being able to take their holidays in Aya Napa :lol:

The point I'm making is not that businesses should never fly, but to disincentivise the unnecessary ones.

Cronus' point about universities is a case in point, and sums up my gripe about people going to 'conferences'. I bet a lot of academics travel is on these conference rubbish. It's all about 'prestige' in 'presenting a paper' at a foreign location. All they do is give a powerpoint about their research, then you get a panel session of self-important experts pontificating on some topic before everyone goes away and eats the buffet lunch and does networking, ie hobknobbing with someone they want to suck up to, or chatting someone up while their wife is safely back home.

At least our carbon footprint discussing this issue on rlfans is pretty low. You can guarantee there are some climate change academics flying around the world to talk about this same issue at a conference.


As kids we went to Morecambe and Colwyn Bay - anyone who doesn't think Torremolinas is an upgrade for a youngster doesn't understand youngsters.

How did we ever manage when we didn't mobile phones? Is the world a better or worse place for them?

I completely agree about unnecessary travel - everytime I go on holiday I come across some conference or other - in Croatia it was some cancer specialists.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Club Coach16252
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 12 200420 years60th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
14th Apr 24 17:4527th Feb 24 19:53LINK
Milestone Posts
15000
20000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Signature
Challenge Cup winners 2009 2010 2012 2019
League Leaders 2011 2016

Re: taking less flights : Fri Jan 17, 2020 4:41 pm  
Sal Paradise wrote:
As kids we went to Morecambe and Colwyn Bay - anyone who doesn't think Torremolinas is an upgrade for a youngster doesn't understand youngsters.

How did we ever manage when we didn't mobile phones? Is the world a better or worse place for them?


The problem comes when new things raise expectations that become unsustainable.

Free university tuition and generous final salary pension schemes that allow people to retire at 60 on a good income also made the world a better place.

Unfortunately there comes a point where it becomes unsustainable and strict rationing needs to be put on future generations.

Given the scale of the climate emergency we need to make serious changes in lifestyle now on things like flying and meat/dairy consumption or we will leave a very difficult situation for future generations who will not have the option just to 'carry on as usual'.

The scientific community is in a broad consensus about this. Some people just choose to ignore it because they don't want to compromise on their own lifestyle, and bury their heads in the sand with the belief "it can't be as bad as they say". Strangely these are also probably the same people who would say the country can't afford free tuition and generous final salary pension schemes because that would be super-devastating...
Cronus 
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach7152
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 30 200519 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
4th Dec 20 18:2622nd Jun 20 21:45LINK
Milestone Posts
5000
10000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
one day closer to death

Re: taking less flights : Fri Jan 17, 2020 10:53 pm  
sally cinnamon wrote:
How did Britons ever cope before being able to take their holidays in Aya Napa :lol:

The point I'm making is not that businesses should never fly, but to disincentivise the unnecessary ones.

Cronus' point about universities is a case in point, and sums up my gripe about people going to 'conferences'. I bet a lot of academics travel is on these conference rubbish. It's all about 'prestige' in 'presenting a paper' at a foreign location. All they do is give a powerpoint about their research, then you get a panel session of self-important experts pontificating on some topic before everyone goes away and eats the buffet lunch and does networking, ie hobknobbing with someone they want to suck up to, or chatting someone up while their wife is safely back home.

At least our carbon footprint discussing this issue on rlfans is pretty low. You can guarantee there are some climate change academics flying around the world to talk about this same issue at a conference.

Conferences are common, but field trips, exchange programmes and research trips are a big part of it. As is the 'International Office' flying mainly to China on recruitment drives. Oh, and let's not forget paying to fly Chinese students in en masse for tours of the facilities.

However, academics also make a few quid by jetsetting around. I know of an academic who - very regularly, i.e. a couple of times a month - flies to Dubai and Bahrain, delivers lectures, then often flies back the same day, lands at about 5am and goes into his UK job at a pretty big university in the North-West.

It did explain to me why most academics are grumpy, rude, entitled, wnkers who expect the world to revolve around them and behave like spoiled brats at the slightest inconvenience.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Club Coach17880
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 24 201113 years47th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
14th Apr 24 18:2314th Apr 24 09:14LINK
Milestone Posts
15000
20000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530

Re: taking less flights : Sat Jan 18, 2020 9:39 am  
Cronus wrote:
Conferences are common, but field trips, exchange programmes and research trips are a big part of it. As is the 'International Office' flying mainly to China on recruitment drives. Oh, and let's not forget paying to fly Chinese students in en masse for tours of the facilities.

However, academics also make a few quid by jetsetting around. I know of an academic who - very regularly, i.e. a couple of times a month - flies to Dubai and Bahrain, delivers lectures, then often flies back the same day, lands at about 5am and goes into his UK job at a pretty big university in the North-West.

It did explain to me why most academics are grumpy, rude, entitled, wnkers who expect the world to revolve around them and behave like spoiled brats at the slightest inconvenience.


What you say may well be the case.
However, if the climate crisis is to be taken seriously, governments accross the globe will have to find ways to reduce the carbon being pumped into the atmosphere and if this means restricting flying, so be it.
For now, the issue isn't being taken too seriously and with China in particular chasing economic growth and still commissioning coal fired power stations etc, to feed their thirst for electricity, there is one hell of a long way to go.

A reduction in consumption would probably be the easiest way to reduce emissions in the short term but, the economic consequences of this would make difficult for most governments to encourage.

The "throw away" society needs to change.

Maybe the "influencers" around the planet should be advocating the hippy lifestyle, instead of promoting st1t that nobody needs :IDEA:
IR80 
RankPostsTeam
Club Captain2215No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jun 24 20195 yearsN/A
OnlineLast PostLast Page
3rd Sep 20 02:4026th Aug 20 00:48LINK
Milestone Posts
1000
2500
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530

Re: taking less flights : Sat Jan 18, 2020 9:57 am  
wrencat1873 wrote:
What you say may well be the case.
However, if the climate crisis is to be taken seriously, governments accross the globe will have to find ways to reduce the carbon being pumped into the atmosphere and if this means restricting flying, so be it.
For now, the issue isn't being taken too seriously and with China in particular chasing economic growth and still commissioning coal fired power stations etc, to feed their thirst for electricity, there is one hell of a long way to go.

A reduction in consumption would probably be the easiest way to reduce emissions in the short term but, the economic consequences of this would make difficult for most governments to encourage.

The "throw away" society needs to change.

Maybe the "influencers" around the planet should be advocating the hippy lifestyle, instead of promoting st1t that nobody needs :IDEA:


There is no climate crisis, the planet evolves.

I do find snowflake wokes to be funny though.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Club Coach17880
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 24 201113 years47th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
14th Apr 24 18:2314th Apr 24 09:14LINK
Milestone Posts
15000
20000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530

Re: taking less flights : Sat Jan 18, 2020 10:16 am  
IR80 wrote:
There is no climate crisis, the planet evolves.

I do find snowflake wokes to be funny though.


More insightful stuff from the East Coast.

If the evolution of the planet means that huge numbers of it's inhabitants will die or have nowhere to live, should we sleepwalk into a difficult situation or, would it be a better idea to try and mitigate future difficulties.
I'll go for the latter but, you can close your eyes and cover your ears.
Snowflake trumps idiot all day long.
PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 244 guests

REPLY

Subject: 
Message:
   
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.
Use the FULL EDITOR to better format content or upload images, be notified of replies etc...

Return to The Sin Bin


RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
0m
Game - Song Titles
Wanderer
35351
1m
BORED The Band Name Game
Wanderer
57183
2m
At Batley
Bullseye
8
4m
York A
Bullseye
24
8m
WIRE YED Prediction Competition Leigh Home
WalterWizard
17
9m
Saints A next up - IAKOW
Roam Ranger
64
17m
Transfer Talk / Rumour thread V4
Trebor1
8793
21m
2024 Challenge Cup Semi-Finals Draws
MadDogg
27
29m
Barrow v Dons Sunday 21/4/24 3pm
Jemmo
7
30m
Squad for Leigh
St Helens Wo
29
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
12s
2024 Challenge Cup Semi-Finals Draws
MadDogg
27
30s
BORED The Band Name Game
Wanderer
57183
43s
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
Roam Ranger
214
50s
Castleford at home
Simba16
36
57s
RD 8 Huddersfield Giants H
FlyingScotty
47
1m
York A
Bullseye
24
1m
Transfer Talk / Rumour thread V4
Trebor1
8793
1m
Rugby leagie coaches - analysis request
rubber ducki
12
1m
Shopping list for 2025
ComeOnYouUll
946
2m
Why have so many big clubs given up on the field
Irregs#16
20
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Squad players
BigTime
1
TODAY
21 Man Squads - Wire v Leopards v
LeythIg
11
TODAY
Squad for Leigh
St Helens Wo
29
TODAY
FINANCES
Listenup94
12
TODAY
AI predictions
Rugby Raider
3
TODAY
Sheffield Game
REDWHITEANDB
3
TODAY
Injury update
dboy
11
TODAY
Seagulls
terry silver
22
TODAY
Rugby leagie coaches - analysis request
rubber ducki
12
TODAY
Castleford at home
Simba16
36
TODAY
David Armstrong potential signing
LeythIg
10
TODAY
France v England Internationals Confirmed for 29th June 2024
RLFANS News
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
France v England International..
851
Warrington Stun St Helens In C..
1614
2024 Challenge Cup Semi-Finals..
1306
Wigan Warriors Demolish Woeful..
1420
Hull KR Eliminate the Cup Hold..
1500
Bradford Bulls Come From Behin..
1921
Bradford Bulls Beat Feathersto..
2375
Giants Thrash FC Again For Top..
2385
Warrington Brush Aside The Rhi..
1957
Wigan Coast to Victory over Le..
2031
Giants Come From Behind For Ea..
2283
Salford Red Devils Defeat Leig..
2792
Catalans Dragons Win See-Saw E..
2228
St Helens Win Derby Game Over ..
2236
Early Season Double for Hull K..
2186