Re: Nuclear fusion : Mon Jan 11, 2016 4:16 pm  

Back on topic. Nukes Do Not Exist The Nuclear Hoax the above documentary explores the truth about nuclear energy and the surprisingly abundant evidence that nuclear weapons are a hoax. Many of the nuclear explosion videos we have all seen and presumed real are shown to be complete fakes using model trees, houses and cars exploding on a set. The destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not the result of one large explosion as advertised, but rather the result of a fire-bombing campaign comparable to Tokyo's fire-bombed remains. Hiroshima and Nagasaki also never experienced anything like the hundreds or thousands of years of radiation predicted by nuclear scientists, in fact, vegetation began growing within a month after the bombing, and the Japanese people began rebuilding almost immediately. Some nuclear physicists even claim nuclear weaponry fraudulent based solely on the technical impossibilities of fission material not to be incinerated before triggering the necessary chain reaction. Top nuclear physicist Galen Winsor explains how nuclear power plants are essentially just steam plants and nothing but the most expensive and effective way to boil water. He completely blows the lid off the idea of nuclear meltdown or nuclear waste, and even eats a good portion of live radioactive waste on camera which he claims to have been doing for years His professional opinion is that fear of nuclear radiation has been greatly exaggerated to scare people and so a few powerful organizations can maintain total control of the world's most valuable energy resource. Even the government teaching school-children to hide under their desks just to induce fear and funnel black tax money into a fake Cold War arms race as big and deceptive as the fake Space Race. With regards to the Anti Semite Franklin Ryckyaert - This Nuclear Physisist Galem Winsor urines all over his chips. Adios

Back on topic. Nukes Do Not Exist The Nuclear Hoax the above documentary explores the truth about nuclear energy and the surprisingly abundant evidence that nuclear weapons are a hoax. Many of the nuclear explosion videos we have all seen and presumed real are shown to be complete fakes using model trees, houses and cars exploding on a set. The destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not the result of one large explosion as advertised, but rather the result of a fire-bombing campaign comparable to Tokyo's fire-bombed remains. Hiroshima and Nagasaki also never experienced anything like the hundreds or thousands of years of radiation predicted by nuclear scientists, in fact, vegetation began growing within a month after the bombing, and the Japanese people began rebuilding almost immediately. Some nuclear physicists even claim nuclear weaponry fraudulent based solely on the technical impossibilities of fission material not to be incinerated before triggering the necessary chain reaction. Top nuclear physicist Galen Winsor explains how nuclear power plants are essentially just steam plants and nothing but the most expensive and effective way to boil water. He completely blows the lid off the idea of nuclear meltdown or nuclear waste, and even eats a good portion of live radioactive waste on camera which he claims to have been doing for years His professional opinion is that fear of nuclear radiation has been greatly exaggerated to scare people and so a few powerful organizations can maintain total control of the world's most valuable energy resource. Even the government teaching school-children to hide under their desks just to induce fear and funnel black tax money into a fake Cold War arms race as big and deceptive as the fake Space Race. With regards to the Anti Semite Franklin Ryckyaert - This Nuclear Physisist Galem Winsor urines all over his chips. Adios

Re: Nuclear fusion : Mon Jan 11, 2016 11:53 pm  

I'm interested in how these firebombing campaigns were done with one plane in one minute, as opposed to hundreds of squadrons of bombers dropping hundreds of thousands of incendiary bombs over several days.

Re: Nuclear fusion : Tue Jan 12, 2016 9:15 am  

Haha.

His stuff is gold.

If there was an award for believing the most gullible guff while maintaining nearly everyone else is wrong, he'd be Premier league.

Has anyone complied a list of his absurdities yet?

I think he's collecting conspiracies.

Re: Nuclear fusion : Tue Jan 12, 2016 12:06 pm  

I can't wait to hear his explanation of Chernobyl and how the fallout of the last 30 years has merely been 'fake'.

Re: Nuclear fusion : Tue Jan 12, 2016 4:05 pm  

In the book Vatican Assassins by Eric Jon Phelps (a non-fiction book about The history of the Jesuits) it is suggested that the bombs used on Japan in WWII were actually placed on the ground beforehand and exploded there. The US bombers having dropped dummy bombs. The reason being that the technology for dropping a-bombs from altitude wasn't developed at that time. This would mean that they'd have to have had cooperation with elements in the Japanese government to place (or construct) the real bombs on the ground ahead of time.

Before you get carried away with your ideas that only so-called nukes can create mushroom clouds I must remind you that conventional bombs detonated at ground level will generate the characteristic mushroom cloud. As the ground level bomb explodes it grows into a big dome of expanding hot gasses. As this dome rises into the cooler upper air mass the air rushing in under the dome creates the mushroom top with curved edges representing the airflow. The stem is made up of the rising column of smoke and heat from the epicentre still fed by the hottest gasses at the point of detonation.

A high altitude blast negates these conditions by heating the air mass around it, above and below, uniformly. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were said to have been bombed with detonations at high altitude. The presence of a mushroom cloud for those exposes the hoax.

With regards to Chernobyl.

Fallacy #1: Chernobyl created the human physical anomalies phenomenon.
Truth: Anomalies existed a very long time before the fertile imaginations of the NWO decided to use them to prop their nuclear reactor hoax.

Fallacy #2: Chernobyl accident proves the existence of commercially viable nuclear energy production.
Truth: Chernobyl proves that a boiler kettle dump load under great pressure can explode, kill and injure people and be exploited as a nuclear accident.

Fallacy #3: Chernobyl produced radiation that killed people exposed to it and injured many others with cancers caused by radiation.
Truth: All insect, animal, birds residing in the so-called "hot" zones were miraculously untouched. No dead dogs, cats, squirrels, snakes, insects. None suffering mutations.

Fallacy #4: The government has no interest in faking the Chernobyl explosion to promote a nuclear reactor hoax.
Truth: Every time commercially-viable nuclear energy claims are put into question the believers chant Chernobyl as if some magical incantation to make sceptics go away. A prime piece of hoax maintenance.

Fallacy #5: It is a dishonour to the dead at Chernobyl to doubt the claims of commercially viable nuclear energy production.
Truth: Its really no worse than questioning the causes of any other deaths said to have been caused by an explosion anywhere else in the world. Explosion Tragedies unfortunately happen Blame the deception perception.

We can settle this no problem..ask the local nuclear power station if you can go and clean the nuclear pile or dump load. Take The Butcher with you, I'm not only bored with his stalking, attempted derailing tactics and dribbling rantings, but you can put him in the pile by proxy. Hahahahaha

Re: Nuclear fusion : Tue Jan 12, 2016 4:42 pm  

Derail.

I don't have to do anything to make you go off point. You're ideas are all over the place.

Re: Nuclear fusion : Tue Jan 12, 2016 5:23 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote: In the book Vatican Assassins by Eric Jon Phelps (a non-fiction book about The history of the Jesuits) it is suggested that the bombs used on Japan in WWII were actually placed on the ground beforehand and exploded there. The US bombers having dropped dummy bombs. The reason being that the technology for dropping a-bombs from altitude wasn't developed at that time. This would mean that they'd have to have had cooperation with elements in the Japanese government to place (or construct) the real bombs on the ground ahead of time. This sounds plausible. Nuclear bombs did not and still don't exist. However, the US was unable to detonate the nuclear bombs they didn't have as they hadn't developed the technology to drop non-existent bombs from altitude at the time. So, despite being in a war to the death, they got the Japanese government to allow them to transport an atomic bomb from the United States to the centre of Hiroshima, and then to synchronize the blast to make it look as if it was a bomb that had been dropped from a plane. And all for nothing, too, as the war continued. Comedy gold, this! FLAT STANLEY wrote: Before you get carried away with your ideas that only so-called nukes can create mushroom clouds Who mentioned mushroom clouds? WTF have they to do with it? FLAT STANLEY wrote: I must remind you that conventional bombs detonated at ground level will generate the characteristic mushroom cloud. No, they won't. The Hiroshima cloud reached an altitude of over 60,000 feet in around ten minutes. No conventioanl bomb would come even close. Of course, I assume the photos are all fake? Here is one taken from Enola Gay around 30 seconds after the blast. Enola Gay is at 30,000 feet and already the cloud is plainly higher than that altitude. FLAT STANLEY wrote: Hiroshima and Nagasaki were said to have been bombed with detonations at high altitude. Said by whom? Expert straw man builders like you? The Hiroshima bomb was detonated at 600 metres and the Nagasaki bomb at 500 metres, so extremely low altitude. These altitudes were specifically chosen so as to (a) flatten the maximum number of structures (b) create the maximum possible firestorm; and (c) kill the maximum number of people for the added benefit of minimising the number of persons available to fight fires and maximise the firestorm. It was in fact a British scientist, Willam Penney, who was chiefly responsible for calculating the optimum detonation heights of nuclear bombs. You can read his declassified work here: http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/wp-conte ... Gadget.pdf But no doubt that's a fake too?

FLAT STANLEY wrote: In the book Vatican Assassins by Eric Jon Phelps (a non-fiction book about The history of the Jesuits) it is suggested that the bombs used on Japan in WWII were actually placed on the ground beforehand and exploded there. The US bombers having dropped dummy bombs. The reason being that the technology for dropping a-bombs from altitude wasn't developed at that time. This would mean that they'd have to have had cooperation with elements in the Japanese government to place (or construct) the real bombs on the ground ahead of time. This sounds plausible. Nuclear bombs did not and still don't exist. However, the US was unable to detonate the nuclear bombs they didn't have as they hadn't developed the technology to drop non-existent bombs from altitude at the time. So, despite being in a war to the death, they got the Japanese government to allow them to transport an atomic bomb from the United States to the centre of Hiroshima, and then to synchronize the blast to make it look as if it was a bomb that had been dropped from a plane. And all for nothing, too, as the war continued. Comedy gold, this! FLAT STANLEY wrote: Before you get carried away with your ideas that only so-called nukes can create mushroom clouds Who mentioned mushroom clouds? WTF have they to do with it? FLAT STANLEY wrote: I must remind you that conventional bombs detonated at ground level will generate the characteristic mushroom cloud. No, they won't. The Hiroshima cloud reached an altitude of over 60,000 feet in around ten minutes. No conventioanl bomb would come even close. Of course, I assume the photos are all fake? Here is one taken from Enola Gay around 30 seconds after the blast. Enola Gay is at 30,000 feet and already the cloud is plainly higher than that altitude. FLAT STANLEY wrote: Hiroshima and Nagasaki were said to have been bombed with detonations at high altitude. Said by whom? Expert straw man builders like you? The Hiroshima bomb was detonated at 600 metres and the Nagasaki bomb at 500 metres, so extremely low altitude. These altitudes were specifically chosen so as to (a) flatten the maximum number of structures (b) create the maximum possible firestorm; and (c) kill the maximum number of people for the added benefit of minimising the number of persons available to fight fires and maximise the firestorm. It was in fact a British scientist, Willam Penney, who was chiefly responsible for calculating the optimum detonation heights of nuclear bombs. You can read his declassified work here: http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/wp-conte ... Gadget.pdf But no doubt that's a fake too?

Re: Nuclear fusion : Tue Jan 12, 2016 6:27 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote: The destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not the result of one large explosion as advertised, but rather the result of a fire-bombing campaign comparable to Tokyo's fire-bombed remains. The crucial difference between cities devastated by firebombing and cities like Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which were devastated by atom bombs, is that hundreds of planes in constant relays over several days are necessary for the firebombing of cities, whereas ONE PLANE CARRYING ONE BOMB was sufficient for Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Let's have a look at the facts about firebombing Tokyo and see if they hold-up against your idea that something identical happened at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. According to the Institute for historical review (http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v16/v16n3p-4_Weber.html, On March 9-10, 1945, a wave of 300 American bombers struck Tokyo, killing 100,000 people. 1700 tons of bombs were necessary to accomplish this devastation. On May 23, 1945, “520 giant B-29 ‘Superfortress’ American bombers unleashed 4,500 tons of incendiary bombs n the heart of the already battered Japanese capital.” Two days later, on May 25, “a second strike of 502 ‘Superfortress’ planes roared low over Tokyo, raining down 4,000 tons of explosives." If Hiroshima and Nagasaki had been given the identical firebombing treatment, as the conspiracy theory asserts, they too would have required hundreds of giant planes dropping thousands of tons of explosives over several days. We know for a fact—for the Japanese victims were themselves eyewitnesses to each atomic attack—that only ONE plane dropping ONE bomb was sufficient to accomplish the devastation at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The bomb dropped on Nagasaki, for example, weighed 10,000 pounds. Note that: pounds, not tons. For firebombing Tokyo, tons of bombs were necessary over several days. At Nagasaki, one much lighter bomb, weighed in pounds not tons, did the trick in nine seconds. Nine seconds. Like Tokyo and other Japanese cities, many German cities were subjected to firebombing. In all cases, hundreds of planes carrying thousands of tons of explosives were necessary over a period of several days in order to accomplish the devastation. Not one of these cities was reduced to ruins within a few seconds, as in the case of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Nor did any of these other firebombed cities report “the trans-generational malignancies and immune deficiencies caused by the deadly plutonium and other radioactive isotopes produced by the bomb.” The facts say otherwise to your assertion without proper evidence, and that's without going into the ridiculous consequences of Nuclear weapons being all pretend that you elude to.

FLAT STANLEY wrote: The destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not the result of one large explosion as advertised, but rather the result of a fire-bombing campaign comparable to Tokyo's fire-bombed remains. The crucial difference between cities devastated by firebombing and cities like Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which were devastated by atom bombs, is that hundreds of planes in constant relays over several days are necessary for the firebombing of cities, whereas ONE PLANE CARRYING ONE BOMB was sufficient for Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Let's have a look at the facts about firebombing Tokyo and see if they hold-up against your idea that something identical happened at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. According to the Institute for historical review (http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v16/v16n3p-4_Weber.html, On March 9-10, 1945, a wave of 300 American bombers struck Tokyo, killing 100,000 people. 1700 tons of bombs were necessary to accomplish this devastation. On May 23, 1945, “520 giant B-29 ‘Superfortress’ American bombers unleashed 4,500 tons of incendiary bombs n the heart of the already battered Japanese capital.” Two days later, on May 25, “a second strike of 502 ‘Superfortress’ planes roared low over Tokyo, raining down 4,000 tons of explosives." If Hiroshima and Nagasaki had been given the identical firebombing treatment, as the conspiracy theory asserts, they too would have required hundreds of giant planes dropping thousands of tons of explosives over several days. We know for a fact—for the Japanese victims were themselves eyewitnesses to each atomic attack—that only ONE plane dropping ONE bomb was sufficient to accomplish the devastation at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The bomb dropped on Nagasaki, for example, weighed 10,000 pounds. Note that: pounds, not tons. For firebombing Tokyo, tons of bombs were necessary over several days. At Nagasaki, one much lighter bomb, weighed in pounds not tons, did the trick in nine seconds. Nine seconds. Like Tokyo and other Japanese cities, many German cities were subjected to firebombing. In all cases, hundreds of planes carrying thousands of tons of explosives were necessary over a period of several days in order to accomplish the devastation. Not one of these cities was reduced to ruins within a few seconds, as in the case of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Nor did any of these other firebombed cities report “the trans-generational malignancies and immune deficiencies caused by the deadly plutonium and other radioactive isotopes produced by the bomb.” The facts say otherwise to your assertion without proper evidence, and that's without going into the ridiculous consequences of Nuclear weapons being all pretend that you elude to.

Re: Nuclear fusion : Tue Jan 12, 2016 6:28 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote: Said by whom? Expert straw man builders like you? The Hiroshima bomb was detonated at 600 metres and the Nagasaki bomb at 500 metres, so extremely low altitude. These altitudes were specifically chosen so as to (a) flatten the maximum number of structures (b) create the maximum possible firestorm; and (c) kill the maximum number of people for the added benefit of minimising the number of persons available to fight fires and maximise the firestorm. Hahahaha Comedy gold is this. Taken from Wikipedia: You stated erroneously highlighted above low altitude, when in fact it was High Altitude Altitude is defined on the following scale: High altitude: 8,000 - 12,000 feet (2,438 - 3,658 meters); Very high altitude: 12,000 - 18,000 feet (3,658 - 5,487 meters); and. Extremely high altitude: 18,000+ feet (5,500+ meters). You forgot to read up on your Altitudes. hahaha. Comedy Gold. The bombing Hiroshima was the primary target of the first nuclear bombing mission on August 6, with Kokura and Nagasaki as alternative targets. Having been fully briefed under the terms of Operations Order No. 35, the 393d Bombardment Squadron B-29 Enola Gay, piloted by Tibbets, took off from North Field, Tinian, about six hours' flight time from Japan. The Enola Gay (named after Tibbets' mother) was accompanied by two other B-29s. The Great Artiste, commanded by Major Charles Sweeney, carried instrumentation, and a then-nameless aircraft later called Necessary Evil, commanded by Captain George Marquardt, served as the photography aircraft.[119] After leaving Tinian the aircraft made their way separately to Iwo Jima to rendezvous with Sweeney and Marquardt at 05:55 at 9,200 feet (2,800 m),[121] and set course for Japan. The aircraft arrived over the target in clear visibility at 31,060 feet (9,470 m).[122] Parsons, who was in command of the mission, armed the bomb during the flight to minimize the risks during takeoff. He had witnessed four B-29s crash and burn at takeoff, and feared that a nuclear explosion would occur if a B-29 crashed with an armed Little Boy on board.[123] His assistant, Second Lieutenant Morris R. Jeppson, removed the safety devices 30 minutes before reaching the target area.[124] Hahahaha. High Altitude as i claimed earlier high altitude blast negates these conditions by heating the air mass around it, above and below, uniformly. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were said to have been bombed with detonations at high altitude. The presence of a mushroom cloud for those exposes the hoax Comedy Gold

Ferocious Aardvark wrote: Said by whom? Expert straw man builders like you? The Hiroshima bomb was detonated at 600 metres and the Nagasaki bomb at 500 metres, so extremely low altitude. These altitudes were specifically chosen so as to (a) flatten the maximum number of structures (b) create the maximum possible firestorm; and (c) kill the maximum number of people for the added benefit of minimising the number of persons available to fight fires and maximise the firestorm. Hahahaha Comedy gold is this. Taken from Wikipedia: You stated erroneously highlighted above low altitude, when in fact it was High Altitude Altitude is defined on the following scale: High altitude: 8,000 - 12,000 feet (2,438 - 3,658 meters); Very high altitude: 12,000 - 18,000 feet (3,658 - 5,487 meters); and. Extremely high altitude: 18,000+ feet (5,500+ meters). You forgot to read up on your Altitudes. hahaha. Comedy Gold. The bombing Hiroshima was the primary target of the first nuclear bombing mission on August 6, with Kokura and Nagasaki as alternative targets. Having been fully briefed under the terms of Operations Order No. 35, the 393d Bombardment Squadron B-29 Enola Gay, piloted by Tibbets, took off from North Field, Tinian, about six hours' flight time from Japan. The Enola Gay (named after Tibbets' mother) was accompanied by two other B-29s. The Great Artiste, commanded by Major Charles Sweeney, carried instrumentation, and a then-nameless aircraft later called Necessary Evil, commanded by Captain George Marquardt, served as the photography aircraft.[119] After leaving Tinian the aircraft made their way separately to Iwo Jima to rendezvous with Sweeney and Marquardt at 05:55 at 9,200 feet (2,800 m),[121] and set course for Japan. The aircraft arrived over the target in clear visibility at 31,060 feet (9,470 m).[122] Parsons, who was in command of the mission, armed the bomb during the flight to minimize the risks during takeoff. He had witnessed four B-29s crash and burn at takeoff, and feared that a nuclear explosion would occur if a B-29 crashed with an armed Little Boy on board.[123] His assistant, Second Lieutenant Morris R. Jeppson, removed the safety devices 30 minutes before reaching the target area.[124] Hahahaha. High Altitude as i claimed earlier high altitude blast negates these conditions by heating the air mass around it, above and below, uniformly. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were said to have been bombed with detonations at high altitude. The presence of a mushroom cloud for those exposes the hoax Comedy Gold

Re: Nuclear fusion : Tue Jan 12, 2016 7:30 pm  

Can I ask a genuine question, Stanley?

If nuclear weapons are fake, NASA is fake, We're being tricked into thinking the earth is flat, that evolution is a hoax, that there's secret societies controlling the world for their own benefit, and probably lots of other ideas that you haven't made public. Why? and what links all these ideas together into a coherent whole? and what sources do you rely on for these claims and how do you verify their accuracy?

I'm genuinely interested.