Re: Nuclear fusion : Thu Jan 14, 2016 5:22 pm  

TheButcher wrote:

Conflicts of interest regarding what?

People always whisper about things they don't, can't, or wont have access to. Whispers are always way over the top because, well, people don't tend to gossip about the mundane when it comes to these things. It has to be secure and sensitive by its very nature. If it wasn't we'd have all kinds of problems.

I suggest reigning-in your imagination a little. It's okay to speculate, but in my experience when you get a lot of speculation, it's not long before wild ideas become cemented as fact because they are repeated enough times rather than any grain of truth comes forward.

Often, the truth is a let down. A bit boring. Almost always normal.

I'm just offering an opinion based on my experiences in a job where I was not constrained or compartmentalized because of the nature of what I did.

Conflicts of interest because of you're involvement within the industry. How high did you scale.

I understand what you're implying based on your experience with respect to health and safety etc, but I'm also in the know that censorship derives your opinion. I'd love to spill the beans on certain substantive issues that bare some weight but I'd be a clown to broadcast it on here. Stanley contributed the nucleus that hallmarks the nature of this beast. Censorship speaks the loudest here.

Re: Nuclear fusion : Thu Jan 14, 2016 5:57 pm  

whothefeckisalice wrote:

Conflicts of interest because of you're involvement within the industry. How high did you scale.

I understand what you're implying based on your experience with respect to health and safety etc, but I'm also in the know that censorship derives your opinion. I'd love to spill the beans on certain substantive issues that bare some weight but I'd be a clown to broadcast it on here. Stanley contributed the nucleus that hallmarks the nature of this beast. Censorship speaks the loudest here.

Not at all. There's no conflict of interest because these places do what they were built for. The self-imposed censorship I mentioned is my preference based on the job I did, which is based around the security of these sites. Not only would I be foolish giving details on a public forum, I'd be in some trouble. That's the nature of the work I did, not due to some kind of Draconian censorship imposed by some strange controlloing power. I chipped-in on the conversation based on a couple of lines that said everything was secret for nefarious reasons, which is not true, and some other lines saying that Nuclear reactors are just some kind of steam factories set-up for some reason to fool us all. Also not true.

You can believe whatever you want if it keeps you amused. It's not like anything I say will change your opinion.

Re: Nuclear fusion : Thu Jan 14, 2016 6:57 pm  

Butcher... I totally understand and respect your background and situation with regards to this subject and i also respect your opinion especially after the conversation we privately had previously, however i'm of the opinion as to what i've read and watched on this matter, a simple watch of Galen Winsor is fascinating to whatever side of the fence you sit on. After this post i'm ceasing posting on this subject as i think my message has been said loud and clear Cheers. Galen Winsor.

Butcher... I totally understand and respect your background and situation with regards to this subject and i also respect your opinion especially after the conversation we privately had previously, however i'm of the opinion as to what i've read and watched on this matter, a simple watch of Galen Winsor is fascinating to whatever side of the fence you sit on. After this post i'm ceasing posting on this subject as i think my message has been said loud and clear Cheers. Galen Winsor.

Re: Nuclear fusion : Thu Jan 14, 2016 8:09 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote: Butcher... I totally understand and respect your background and situation with regards to this subject and i also respect your opinion especially after the conversation we privately had previously, however i'm of the opinion as to what i've read and watched on this matter, a simple watch of Galen Winsor is fascinating to whatever side of the fence you sit on. After this post i'm ceasing posting on this subject as i think my message has been said loud and clear Cheers. Galen Winsor. Unfortunately, Galen Winsor and this video have been given a thorough treatment by someone who loves their facts. I'm not sure anyone will have the stamina to go through the whole blog as it's very long but also very comprehensive. I, likewise, will retire from the thread as I've said all I want to on the subject and don't want to be going tit-for-tat. Click here for the video lowdown Cheers.

FLAT STANLEY wrote: Butcher... I totally understand and respect your background and situation with regards to this subject and i also respect your opinion especially after the conversation we privately had previously, however i'm of the opinion as to what i've read and watched on this matter, a simple watch of Galen Winsor is fascinating to whatever side of the fence you sit on. After this post i'm ceasing posting on this subject as i think my message has been said loud and clear Cheers. Galen Winsor. Unfortunately, Galen Winsor and this video have been given a thorough treatment by someone who loves their facts. I'm not sure anyone will have the stamina to go through the whole blog as it's very long but also very comprehensive. I, likewise, will retire from the thread as I've said all I want to on the subject and don't want to be going tit-for-tat. Click here for the video lowdown Cheers.