Re: Under new ownership -delusionals corner : Wed Feb 24, 2016 3:15 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote:

Well you can't be very efficient at it, all you do is stalk me with angst cranial insults. Firearms officer yeah right my bullet you are.

You can believe whatever you want, Stan. You plainly do with everything else.

Re: Under new ownership -delusionals corner : Thu Mar 03, 2016 6:26 pm  

Heres proof the Earth is not a Globe. Proved by 73 mile fish eye lensed camera and also by Time And Date and the Moons position....Moon Proves Flat Earth Hahahaha. Debunk that. Its a six minute clip which smashes the globe. Apologies for the convex concave fisheye lens.

Heres proof the Earth is not a Globe. Proved by 73 mile fish eye lensed camera and also by Time And Date and the Moons position....Moon Proves Flat Earth Hahahaha. Debunk that. Its a six minute clip which smashes the globe. Apologies for the convex concave fisheye lens.

Re: Under new ownership -delusionals corner : Thu Mar 03, 2016 10:19 pm  

That youtube clip is utter nonsense. You do realise that any scientific theory that has been changed due to new evidence has never been done so by some sad virgin sitting in his basement posting tripe on youtube.

Re: Under new ownership -delusionals corner : Thu Mar 03, 2016 10:37 pm  

Best thing about that video is Rowdy Roddy Piper around 4 and half minutes! Oh, and Henning Wehn doing the voice over.

Re: Under new ownership -delusionals corner : Sun Mar 06, 2016 12:28 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote: Heres proof the Earth is not a Globe. Proved by 73 mile fish eye lensed camera and also by Time And Date and the Moons position....Moon Proves Flat Earth Hahahaha. Debunk that. Its a six minute clip which smashes the globe. Apologies for the convex concave fisheye lens. Dear Mr Stanley, or can I call you Flat? I'm confused. On Wednesday morning I'm going to Central Sulawesi to witness the 'total solar eclipse'. http://www.timeanddate.com/eclipse/in/indonesia/palu I've heard some stories about this phenomenon and how they know exactly where and when they are visible but these seem to rely on calculations based on the false science and their model of the 'solar system'. I'd like to know how it really works. How can millions of people see it exactly as predicted. Where I live in South Sulawesi they say there will be only 90% coverage. Which is why I'm driving 14 hours to a suitable viewing position. I guess it's something to do with NASA, but how they do it? Particularly over such a wide area and perfectly choreographed and timed to perfection. This must have been even more difficult to achieve in the millions of years before computers and NASA existed. I guess they could have faked the photos and bribed the billions of eye witnesses who are still alive?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_eclipse_of_July_28,_1851 . Please explain. Thanks Coco

FLAT STANLEY wrote: Heres proof the Earth is not a Globe. Proved by 73 mile fish eye lensed camera and also by Time And Date and the Moons position....Moon Proves Flat Earth Hahahaha. Debunk that. Its a six minute clip which smashes the globe. Apologies for the convex concave fisheye lens. Dear Mr Stanley, or can I call you Flat? I'm confused. On Wednesday morning I'm going to Central Sulawesi to witness the 'total solar eclipse'. http://www.timeanddate.com/eclipse/in/indonesia/palu I've heard some stories about this phenomenon and how they know exactly where and when they are visible but these seem to rely on calculations based on the false science and their model of the 'solar system'. I'd like to know how it really works. How can millions of people see it exactly as predicted. Where I live in South Sulawesi they say there will be only 90% coverage. Which is why I'm driving 14 hours to a suitable viewing position. I guess it's something to do with NASA, but how they do it? Particularly over such a wide area and perfectly choreographed and timed to perfection. This must have been even more difficult to achieve in the millions of years before computers and NASA existed. I guess they could have faked the photos and bribed the billions of eye witnesses who are still alive?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_eclipse_of_July_28,_1851 . Please explain. Thanks Coco

Re: Under new ownership -delusionals corner : Sun Mar 06, 2016 4:49 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote: Heres proof the Earth is not a Globe. Proved by 73 mile fish eye lensed camera and also by Time And Date and the Moons position....Moon Proves Flat Earth Hahahaha. Debunk that. Its a six minute clip which smashes the globe. Apologies for the convex concave fisheye lens. Hmmm. Unlike your technique of swallowing whole whatever your delusional mates publish, I considered that video. Obviously it's a fake, because he's forgotten to put in the stars. CGI bullcrap. Etc. Sorry, just winding you up, although the reasons no stars are visible in his video is the same as why no stars are seen in The Blue Marble, or in moon photographs. 1. It proves the Earth is a globe, since you tell us that however high we go, our eyes are always level with the horizon - yet at only 73 miles, the view of the curve of the globe is abundantly clear 2. If the Earth were flat then the whole of the flat Earth should be visibletrailing away in all directions. It's not. The local area and some distance in all directions from it can be seen, but no further than that. Exactly what you'd expect, as you go higher, you can see further around the curve of the globe, but still you can't see that far, as the curve of the globe drops away over all horizons. 3. The idiot who made the video thinks that the ground position of the moon (i.e., the place on Earth where the moon would appear directly overhead) means you can only see the moon from there. In fact, the moon is approx a quarter of a million miles away and as such at any given time can be seen from not far off half the Earth. 4. Here's a screenshot of the view of the sky from the approximate launch location, on the date in question, at approximately the time he says the rocket was launched, and from an altitude of 120km. I used the fantastic free resource Stellarium. What's that thing I see in the south east, easily visible above the horizon? Well, I never. It's the Moon. Oddly enough, in just the same direction, from the perspective of the launch site, as the "moon dot" on your idiot mate's map. Epic fail Stan, although not your fault, save for being so gullible; you just uncritically wanted to believe your idiot mate, but it turns out that he has no idea what he is talking about. HTH

FLAT STANLEY wrote: Heres proof the Earth is not a Globe. Proved by 73 mile fish eye lensed camera and also by Time And Date and the Moons position....Moon Proves Flat Earth Hahahaha. Debunk that. Its a six minute clip which smashes the globe. Apologies for the convex concave fisheye lens. Hmmm. Unlike your technique of swallowing whole whatever your delusional mates publish, I considered that video. Obviously it's a fake, because he's forgotten to put in the stars. CGI bullcrap. Etc. Sorry, just winding you up, although the reasons no stars are visible in his video is the same as why no stars are seen in The Blue Marble, or in moon photographs. 1. It proves the Earth is a globe, since you tell us that however high we go, our eyes are always level with the horizon - yet at only 73 miles, the view of the curve of the globe is abundantly clear 2. If the Earth were flat then the whole of the flat Earth should be visibletrailing away in all directions. It's not. The local area and some distance in all directions from it can be seen, but no further than that. Exactly what you'd expect, as you go higher, you can see further around the curve of the globe, but still you can't see that far, as the curve of the globe drops away over all horizons. 3. The idiot who made the video thinks that the ground position of the moon (i.e., the place on Earth where the moon would appear directly overhead) means you can only see the moon from there. In fact, the moon is approx a quarter of a million miles away and as such at any given time can be seen from not far off half the Earth. 4. Here's a screenshot of the view of the sky from the approximate launch location, on the date in question, at approximately the time he says the rocket was launched, and from an altitude of 120km. I used the fantastic free resource Stellarium. What's that thing I see in the south east, easily visible above the horizon? Well, I never. It's the Moon. Oddly enough, in just the same direction, from the perspective of the launch site, as the "moon dot" on your idiot mate's map. Epic fail Stan, although not your fault, save for being so gullible; you just uncritically wanted to believe your idiot mate, but it turns out that he has no idea what he is talking about. HTH

Re: Under new ownership -delusionals corner : Tue Mar 08, 2016 9:05 pm  

Prescription must have been sorted this week...

Re: Under new ownership -delusionals corner : Mon Apr 11, 2016 11:20 am  

Spot The Common Denominators, Then Apply Occam's Razor. ? And it's not the Masonic Hand Signal.

Re: Under new ownership -delusionals corner : Fri Apr 15, 2016 12:05 pm  

Indeed it's not a Masonic hand signal. Or, it may for all i know, also be one, but what it is on this particular occasion was the Vulcan salute, in tribute to Leonard Nimoy. The image is Samantha Cristoforetti, who lived on the ISS between November 2014-June 2015. The giveaway is she's wearing a Star trek top. Here she is again: She spent 200 days in space, here's a brief article, complete with video of the ISS toilet http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/science/1.701324

Indeed it's not a Masonic hand signal. Or, it may for all i know, also be one, but what it is on this particular occasion was the Vulcan salute, in tribute to Leonard Nimoy. The image is Samantha Cristoforetti, who lived on the ISS between November 2014-June 2015. The giveaway is she's wearing a Star trek top. Here she is again: She spent 200 days in space, here's a brief article, complete with video of the ISS toilet http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/science/1.701324

Re: Under new ownership -delusionals corner : Fri Apr 15, 2016 12:08 pm  

I knew Mr Spock was part of the heliocentric Masonic cabal that dictates all aspects of modern life; he had funny ears - dead giveaway.