Re: Lachlan Walmsley : Tue Mar 21, 2023 11:01 am  

cowfax wrote:

Nor I.

A Keighley player given ten for a huge push, A fax player given ten for running alongside. To even up?

A wrong poor decision, it’s not touch rugby and there was more contact in the chasing players when Walmsley went full length.

Re: Lachlan Walmsley : Tue Mar 21, 2023 11:58 am  

faxcar wrote:

A wrong poor decision, it’s not touch rugby and there was more contact in the chasing players when Walmsley went full length. :CRAZY:

Aye, I've just watched it back and it should have been our ball and carry on. I think the officials had mentioned at half time the possibility of Maizen obstructing the Keighley chaser for Walmsleys try and picking him out for summat that then didn't happen. It was then made worse by sin binning him, ridiculous, and to top it off Keighley scored to get them back into the game and Walmsley gets injured trying to prevent the try and is now out for four weeks maybe. Well done ref! :oops:

Re: Lachlan Walmsley : Tue Mar 21, 2023 3:47 pm  

I would go with Tibbs to replace Lachlan. That could be Tibbs on the wing as a straight swap or like others have said move Jake on the wing and play Tibbs at centre.