The old chestnut of heartland clubs v expansion clubs : Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:05 pm  

Last night once again proved that its in places like Halifax and Widnes where the game will increase its fan base and is better off concentrating its efforts rather than wasting time in far off places where football or RU rules.
Plus there is a lot more passion as people really care about the game and create a good atmosphere.
Winning obviously helps but I ask would Celtic Crusaders have got such a crowd last night (an all pay gate note).
How many did Harlequins get today against another SL club???

Re: The old chestnut of heartland clubs v expansion clubs : Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:10 pm  

Fax4Life wrote:

.
How many did Harlequins get today against another SL club???

2.500

Re: The old chestnut of heartland clubs v expansion clubs : Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:14 pm  

Fax4Life wrote:

How many did Harlequins get today against another SL club???

2,500

Unfortunately, BskyB don't share your "parochial" outlook. That's the way it is i'm afraid. We'll get back in if: we win trophy's, increase our gate (in spite of what Harlequins or Celtic do in this regard) and improve our financial clout.

: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:00 pm  

Its interesting that nobody cites Catalan in this debate.

: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:05 pm  

J O N N Y wrote:

Its interesting that nobody cites Catalan in this debate.

You mean that hotbed of French Rugby League - with a proven track record of a decent fan base? No, they weren't mentioned - for that very reason. Are you referring to the Geographical technicalities of franchising? I'll pm you when we debate that one yeah?

: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:37 pm  

littlerich wrote:

You mean that hotbed of French Rugby League - with a proven track record of a decent fan base? No, they weren't mentioned - for that very reason. Are you referring to the Geographical technicalities of franchising? I'll pm you when we debate that one yeah?

Fair enough, and i guess that the attendences of Halifax in 2002 and 2003 were well above the 6351 and 5272 that celtic have had this season.

: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 pm  

J O N N Y wrote:

Fair enough, and i guess that the attendences of Halifax in 2002 and 2003 were well above the 6351 and 5272 that celtic have had this season.

Against St Helens and Hull ? - no, probably not. We charged our fans though. I have no problems with Celtic but let's see what their average ends up at after they've finished the season's slaughter. Come back with your trolling then J o n n y.

: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:52 pm  

littlerich wrote:

Against St Helens and Hull ? - no, probably not. We charged our fans though. I have no problems with Celtic but let's see what their average ends up at after they've finished the season's slaughter. Come back with your trolling then J o n n y.

Im not trolling, i came on here looking for a thread about the CC and got sidetracked into this one. Im pretty glad haifax have gone well this season, and was going to ask who everyone would want in the next round.

But if you would lie, let me know what your averge attendence was in super league and we can cpompare it to celtics average, after they have been slaughtered all season.

: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:54 pm  

J O N N Y wrote:

But if you would lie, let me know what your averge attendence was in super league and we can cpompare it to celtics average, after they have been slaughtered all season.

Ours was dire. It wasn't much over 3,000 i think. I'm sat doing naff all at the moment - i'll go and have a look.

: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:58 pm  

littlerich wrote:

Ours was dire. It wasn't much over 3,000 i think. I'm sat doing naff all at the moment - i'll go and have a look.

Fair,

whilst your on here then, you hoping for a SL team in the CC? And if i knew how the gate money was divided this would be a redundant question, but you wanting a game at the shay or to do some traveling?