Re: 100k : Sat Aug 21, 2010 9:49 am  

The Dors wrote:

Speaking of which, how awesome did it look on Sunday!?

Completely agree there fella, it was well talked about how good it looked, the groundmen and women deserve credit where it is due. Looked proper lush withall the heat and rain. Lets hope those amatuers dont mess it up in their 30 games or so played on it, sliding around and falling over like girlies.

Re: 100k : Sat Aug 21, 2010 2:13 pm  

Charlie The Cat wrote:

waddy. you are, however, entitled to your opinion (as long as the mods see fit)

Cat neutering.

And, yes, I see fit.

Re: 100k : Sun Aug 22, 2010 12:25 am  

The money would compensate for the Challenge Cup fiasco,it would also be great to see some money invested in the youth programme at Halifax.One of the criterias to gain Super League status is to have a fully developed youth structure in place,and lets be honest this is were Widnes,Leigh leave us wanted.I realise that to structure a youth set up takes money,administration ,coaching staff ct,but the last thing we awant is the loss of a youth set up not being in place letting us down.

Re: 100k : Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:20 am  

The club benefits from the gate revenues.

Someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but I was lead to believe that the clubs taking part in the finals only received winning/lossing pay and the gate revenue went to the RL.

Re: 100k : Sun Aug 22, 2010 7:12 pm  

Only the winners get any money [Players] the losers get nowt not even appearence money.

Re: 100k : Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:14 pm  

whistle blower wrote:

Only the winners get any money [Players] the losers get nowt not even appearence money.

Not strictly true....