starting props : Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:58 am  

after seeing widnes and what they have to offer i think it would be a good idea for us to start with siad and franky to get a good start

anyone else thinking this.

: Fri Mar 13, 2009 6:58 am  

nope... we would lack impact from the bench if we did this. Much better starting off with James (if we get him back otherwise Wrenchy) & Wilson

Re: starting props : Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:52 am  

faxtastic wrote:

after seeing widnes and what they have to offer i think it would be a good idea for us to start with siad and franky to get a good start

anyone else thinking this.

Wrong!!!!

Re: starting props : Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:57 am  

faxtastic wrote:

after seeing widnes and what they have to offer i think it would be a good idea for us to start with siad and franky to get a good start

anyone else thinking this.

No

Re: starting props : Fri Mar 13, 2009 9:00 am  

faxtastic wrote:

after seeing widnes and what they have to offer i think it would be a good idea for us to start with siad and franky to get a good start

anyone else thinking this.

a big NO NO,,, you r on your own there,, think this should be end of this thread

: Fri Mar 13, 2009 9:23 am  

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooookkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk.

: Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:24 am  

A no from me too.. Frank and Said give that impact that you always hope subs do..

: Fri Mar 13, 2009 11:41 am  

NO

Need tham as impact players.

: Fri Mar 13, 2009 11:44 am  

Wrench and Wilson will work their butts off repelling their forward attacks for 15-20 minutes then Said and Franky come on and move up to the next level. You need to raise your performance over the 80 minutes, not peak at 15 mins then slip down.

: Fri Mar 13, 2009 12:06 pm  

I notice that Lynch is returning for Bradford....