Cas and Wakey most harshly treated at the disciplinary panel : Wed Feb 18, 2009 11:36 am
Those small club conspiracy theories around about players getting harsher punishments than 'big-name' players have some evidence thanks to Phil Clarke. Is there something in it, or is every case different?
Percentage of games banned for in relation to players referred to disciplinary panel: Wakefield - 4 times referred, 8 matches banned: 200% Castleford - 5 times referred, 8 matches banned: 160% Wigan - 12 times referred, 12 matches banned: 100% St Helens - 3 times referred, 3 matches banned: 100% Quins - 9 times referred, 8 matches banned: 89% Catalans - 9 times referred, 8 matches banned: 89% Hudds - 7 times referred, 6 matches banned: 86% Warrington - 10 times referred, 8 matches banned: 80% Leeds - 8 times referred, 5 matches banned: 63% Bradford - 5 times referred, 3 matches banned: 60% Hull KR - 11 times referred, 4 matches banned: 36% Hull FC - 2 times referred, 0 matches banned: 0% |
Those small club conspiracy theories around about players getting harsher punishments than 'big-name' players have some evidence thanks to Phil Clarke. Is there something in it, or is every case different?
Percentage of games banned for in relation to players referred to disciplinary panel: Wakefield - 4 times referred, 8 matches banned: 200% Castleford - 5 times referred, 8 matches banned: 160% Wigan - 12 times referred, 12 matches banned: 100% St Helens - 3 times referred, 3 matches banned: 100% Quins - 9 times referred, 8 matches banned: 89% Catalans - 9 times referred, 8 matches banned: 89% Hudds - 7 times referred, 6 matches banned: 86% Warrington - 10 times referred, 8 matches banned: 80% Leeds - 8 times referred, 5 matches banned: 63% Bradford - 5 times referred, 3 matches banned: 60% Hull KR - 11 times referred, 4 matches banned: 36% Hull FC - 2 times referred, 0 matches banned: 0% |
|