SNITCH at stand off? : Fri Feb 19, 2010 7:36 pm  

Seriously? wtf is going on there

Re: SNITCH at stand off? : Fri Feb 19, 2010 7:39 pm  

Tell you what, if we loss this game now matterson as put himself right in the firing line.......i sometimes wonder what goes through his head when selecting his starting 13.

Re: SNITCH at stand off? : Fri Feb 19, 2010 7:46 pm  

poppys mum wrote:

Tell you what, if we loss this game now matterson as put himself right in the firing line.......i sometimes wonder what goes through his head when selecting his starting 13.

An absolute joke if you ask me

Sherwin needs resting? we're TWO games in to the season, everyone else has played the same two games, why does he need a rest? did he not get enough in the off season?
He is paid a hell of a lot for not much work, he will be injured soon anyway so will get a nice rest then.

Snitch at stand off? ridiculous, why not have McGoldrick at stand off with Owen (a NATURAL full back) at full back

Snitch is an impact player not a playmaker. I really do sometimes wonder where the hell Matterson comes up with these ideas and why on earth he thinks they're good

Re: SNITCH at stand off? : Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:56 pm  

T.M likes to play second rows at stand off, christ knows why

It handed the initiative to Bradford straight away,and put too much of a burden on Chase.

If he was "resting" Sherwin wouldnt it have made sense to play someone who has played at stand off before?
ie Mcgoldrick or even Westerman?

Re: SNITCH at stand off? : Fri Feb 19, 2010 11:12 pm  

I think the whole "resting" Sherwin isn't what it seems. I think he's picked up a knock and isn't being risked. However, McGoldrick should have been playing with Chase and Owen at FB.

I'm angry but I'm not about to start suggesting TM goes like some are on the other board but some questions need to be asked about what the hell he was thinking tonight.

We were absolutely garbage at everything tonight but our defence was abysmal. Missed tackles, lost ball and we looked clueless for practically 80 minutes.

Chase's kicking game was awful, straight into the waiting arms of a Bulls player everytime. It was only when Huby kicked out wide for Owen that we really tested the Bradford line.

Bradford should be wondering how the hell they managed to concede 22 points tonight because we were embarrassingly bad.

Re: SNITCH at stand off? : Sat Feb 20, 2010 2:08 am  

Team selection cost us badly tonight. Had Owen not been playing on the wing...

Re: SNITCH at stand off? : Sat Feb 20, 2010 2:42 pm  

Gaslight wrote:

Seriously? wtf is going on there

As an Academy player at Wakey Snitch started life as a hooker which is oft forgot. That said he moved to Prop then S/R fairly quicKly. Hence he does have a good pair of hands relative to some other forwards, but not good enough to be a S/O Imo.

Re: SNITCH at stand off? : Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:22 pm  

vastman wrote:

As an Academy player at Wakey Snitch started life as a hooker which is oft forgot. That said he moved to Prop then S/R fairly quicKly. Hence he does have a good pair of hands relative to some other forwards, but not good enough to be a S/O Imo.

But if we go on positions people used to play, Huby could have been stand off because he used to play there at one point the obvious choice last night was McGoldrick.

Re: SNITCH at stand off? : Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:14 pm  

very poor performance, they didnt look intrested at all, some of them should be ashamed of themselves