Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:39 pm  

tigerman10 wrote:

so which part of that is our problem and which part of that has anything to do with us goundsharing. i have read your comments on the wakey page makeing us out to be some small town neighbours who need their big city rivals to survive, but the thing is we are not going around begging people to ground share with us. and as for wakefield getting nothing (now i could be wrong here and this may not have council funding so i appologise in advance if i am) but what about the hepworth museum, the development behind the trainstation, the development on jacobswell lane, the work in the bullring, and all the upgrading work that has been done on westgate, some of that must have had council funding.

oh and i forgot the new market hall and the new bus station, so please dont come crying poverty on here pal.

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:46 pm  

tigerman10 wrote:

oh and i forgot the new market hall and the new bus station, so please dont come crying poverty on here pal.

Oh and your forgetting that crapy market stall they built for us next to bus station that cost 7million should we be grateful for that pile of crap hard earning tax payers money for that crap. The bullring some nice shiny tiles and a fountain you have acres of land and the exscape hardly compares does it.

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:50 pm  

newgroundb4cas wrote:

Oh and your forgetting that crapy market stall they built for us next to bus station that cost 7million should we be grateful for that pile of crap hard earning tax payers money for that crap. The bullring some nice shiny tiles and a fountain you have acres of land and the exscape hardly compares does it.

doesnt really matter how it compares does it, the fact is you have had your fair share of the money how it has been spent is not the argument here is it.

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:57 pm  

tigerman10 wrote:

oh and i forgot the new market hall and the new bus station, so please dont come crying poverty on here pal.

For gods sake tigerman10 why ruin a good argument with fact ? blooooooody hell why

also on the wakey am clubs are a discrace topic? Stanley, Crigglestone, Westgate have excellent facilaties Eastmoore is fine ! You do a disjustice to the amount of hard work that is done by all the volunteers at those clubs .

But if your only interested in what a local council can buy then i suggest you go to stanningley, Now thats what i call a facility

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Mon Jul 12, 2010 10:51 pm  

newgroundb4cas wrote:

Would you settle for a ground share on the border of Wakey and Cas? Im beggining to sway that way

You sound desperate. And after all the bad things you have said about Cas you expect a lifeline.

You are a first class prat.

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Mon Jul 12, 2010 11:05 pm  

The OPer is throwing an absolute first class tantrum.


Keep it up

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:09 am  

tigerman10 wrote:

so which part of that is our problem and which part of that has anything to do with us goundsharing. i have read your comments on the wakey page makeing us out to be some small town neighbours who need their big city rivals to survive, but the thing is we are not going around begging people to ground share with us. and as for wakefield getting nothing (now i could be wrong here and this may not have council funding so i appologise in advance if i am) but what about the hepworth museum, the development behind the trainstation, the development on jacobswell lane, the work in the bullring, and all the upgrading work that has been done on westgate, some of that must have had council funding.

I may be wrong but didn't wakey sell there ground to the council therefore they've already had help/money.

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Tue Jul 13, 2010 9:45 am  

Belle Vue has been sold, but not to the council. I believe it was to a housing developer called Cala Homes, or something similar. We have had half this money paid up front (and presumably already spent it on general operating costs, tax arrears, who the hell knows what....) I don't think money is the most immediate problem for us - we have no chance of getting any planning decision, even outline, before the next SL licence applications are submitted in November this year - the whole project just keeps getting taken off the council planning meeting agendas month after month - which says to me that something is not squared away. Without planning permission I do not believe the RFL will grant us another licence - I know I wouldn't take the club at it's promise to get a stadium sorted again. Our regular club apologists/know-alls/bullsh*tters keep saying all is well and this delay is simply in order to get all the details just right, but very many on our board now have less and less faith that the stadium will ever materialise. There is also an air of secrecy around the whole project, but no-one can tell us why. However, this criticism cannot be uttered on the Wakefield board without a barrage of withering replies and a lambasting for being negative.

The ground share has therefore become a possible lifeline for Wakefield in many peoples eyes. But only if it's at Newmarket, mind. You know, the place where there is no prospect of even outline planning permission for the foreseeable future. Basically, I do not think the people involved are capable or competent enough to deliver a project of this scale. I wish Cas nothing but success with their own stadium plans.

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Tue Jul 13, 2010 11:39 am  

Wonder what the news on glasshoughton will be soon?

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Tue Jul 13, 2010 1:05 pm  

duke street 10 wrote:

Wonder what the news on glasshoughton will be soon?

Probably architects designs and ready to submit for full planning permission