Re: Quims : Fri Aug 20, 2010 9:28 am  

Castleford 18 - 26 QUINS RL

Re: Quims : Fri Aug 20, 2010 9:36 am  

Towns88 wrote:

Make Shenny Captain for his home game?

No, why. He isn't captain, or vice captian for that matter. I good round of applause is what he deserves, and a warm recpetion in future years.

Re: Quims : Fri Aug 20, 2010 9:39 am  

Therailwayendisuponus. wrote:

No, why. He isn't captain, or vice captian for that matter. I good round of applause is what he deserves, and a warm recpetion in future years.

Sometimes it can be inspirational in sport, i/e to use an example of Leeds United, departing Beckford made captain scores promotion sealing goal. Something similar may inspire Shenny & rocket us into the playoffs. I wasnt being over sentimental. I just want us to win.

Re: Quims : Sat Aug 21, 2010 10:59 pm  

Jonny Walker nailing LMS?

Re: Quims : Sun Aug 22, 2010 9:38 am  

Any kind of win will do, all though i would like our last home game this season to be something spacial.

Re: Quims : Sun Aug 22, 2010 12:18 pm  

Harlequin Gooner wrote:

Castleford 18 - 26 QUINS RL

are you coming ? or are you not allowed out of the yard alone ?

poor kid

Re: Quims : Sun Aug 22, 2010 6:18 pm  

A wins a win but we could (or is that should) have racked up more points today against a poor Quins side today to offset the predicted drubbing at saints in two weeks.

T.M has to prepare them as its the last game,us against the world type game. As the Sky presentation & commentary team will be all St Helens

Re: Quims : Mon Aug 23, 2010 9:34 am  

duke street 10 wrote:

A wins a win but we could (or is that should) have racked up more points today against a poor Quins side today to offset the predicted drubbing at saints in two weeks.

T.M has to prepare them as its the last game,us against the world type game. As the Sky presentation & commentary team will be all St Helens

We should've completely demolished them but simply weren't allowed to due to how much they slowed the game down. Not that I'm surprised, because they do it every time which is why I generally switch their televised games off (same for Bradford and Crusaders). It's quite disappointing that teams that want to play fast flowing, attacking rugby are unable to, when this is in actual fact what the game is all about. It's time the interpretations of certain rules were tightened to stop these spoiling tactics once and for all - it's the only way the pace of our game will ever match that of the Aussies.

Re: Quims : Mon Aug 23, 2010 3:36 pm  

If there are 2/3 in the tackle are they not under the same obligation under the rules to clear the tackle?
At present #3 rolls off then #2 rolls off after a while then #1 stares waiting for the ref!!!!

One penalty that got me was in the first half yesterday, 3 in the tackle messing about getting off/hands in etc and a penalty for an incorrect play the ball!!
If they werent messing about it would have been a pristine play the ball!

Re: Quims : Tue Aug 24, 2010 8:38 am  

waltontiger wrote:

One penalty that got me was in the first half yesterday, 3 in the tackle messing about getting off/hands in etc and a penalty for an incorrect play the ball!!
If they werent messing about it would have been a pristine play the ball!

Yeah I spotted that one as well - clear cut penalty should've been awarded our way. Shocking decision. When they scored the long range try from our kick too the fourth tackle of that set should've been a penalty because they held on way too long.