Paul Jackson and Steve Snitch : Fri Jul 17, 2009 3:51 pm  

are cas bound so people keep telling me i hope so on Snitch i'd take or leave jackson though!

Re: Paul Jackson and Steve Snitch : Fri Jul 17, 2009 3:57 pm  

WRE wrote:

are cas bound so people keep telling me i hope so on Snitch i'd take or leave jackson though!

signed a 2 year deal l think.

Re: Paul Jackson and Steve Snitch : Fri Jul 17, 2009 4:25 pm  

SimonBarrett wrote:

signed a 2 year deal l think.

Cas offered 3 years, Hull offered 2. The Hull deal involves more money over the two years. Don't know if he has made his mind up to take the Cas deal.

Re: Paul Jackson and Steve Snitch : Fri Jul 17, 2009 4:28 pm  

deeHell wrote:

Cas offered 3 years, Hull offered 2. The Hull deal involves more money over the two years. Don't know if he has made his mind up to take the Cas deal.

??

Is he not still under contract at Wakey??

Heard leeds tried to get him at the same time as Pitts.

Re: Paul Jackson and Steve Snitch : Fri Jul 17, 2009 5:12 pm  

SimonBarrett wrote:

??

Is he not still under contract at Wakey??

Heard leeds tried to get him at the same time as Pitts.

I believe he only signed a one year deal for Wakey last year. I can't see Cas or Hull willing to pay a transfer fee for him.

: Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:17 pm  

Signed a 2 year deal.

: Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:42 pm  

Just to make this clear,and not have any more utter cow balls spread by WRE

He signed a 2yr deal with Wakefield Last Year.

If he leaves after that it will be for a bigger club than you.

You are signing martin (32) on a 2yr deal and drew (33/34) on a one year deal for £120k. Perhaps you may also sign Bibb.

: Fri Jul 17, 2009 10:22 pm  

mwildcats wrote:

Just to make this clear,and not have any more utter cow balls spread by WRE

He signed a 2yr deal with Wakefield Last Year.

If he leaves after that it will be for a bigger club than you.

You are signing martin (32) on a 2yr deal and drew (33/34) on a one year deal for £120k. Perhaps you may also sign Bibb.

Very, very bad signings if true, if drew was to come would expect it to be on a lot less than that, 120 would surely make him one of the best paid players at the club. I dont believe any rumours till they're proved especially bout players wages.

: Fri Jul 17, 2009 10:50 pm  

mwildcats wrote:

Just to make this clear,and not have any more utter cow balls spread by WRE

He signed a 2yr deal with Wakefield Last Year.

If he leaves after that it will be for a bigger club than you.

You are signing martin (32) on a 2yr deal and drew (33/34) on a one year deal for £120k. Perhaps you may also sign Bibb.

You forgot Neil Fox and Jonty Parkin!

[Durham Giant]

: Sat Jul 18, 2009 8:07 am  

The Jackson one could be true. A very solid and dependable prop. More of a squad player than anything else.