: Mon Jul 13, 2009 11:28 am  

jourdmart wrote:

I think it was 5 in reality. I couldn't see any of them from where I was, but according to reports in the papers they all seemed to be fairly ruled out - nobody seems to be complaining from the Tigers camp.

I think all the disallowed tries were correctly chalked off

: Mon Jul 13, 2009 11:41 am  

casman2 wrote:

I think all the disallowed tries were correctly chalked off

Yeah i thinks thats right, the only one i'm not sure about is the one that was under the sticks in the first half the was ajudicated to have gone dead, couldnt see it myself 9to many people blocking my view) but a bloke i know who is always very objective about these things reckoned it was a try.

: Mon Jul 13, 2009 11:44 am  

pyeman wrote:

Yeah i thinks thats right, the only one i'm not sure about is the one that was under the sticks in the first half the was ajudicated to have gone dead, couldnt see it myself 9to many people blocking my view) but a bloke i know who is always very objective about these things reckoned it was a try.

Was that the one where Widders knocked on?

Or the one that was right near the dead ball line? if so, i couldnt see that one

: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:32 pm  

casman2 wrote:

Was that the one where Widders knocked on?

Or the one that was right near the dead ball line? if so, i couldnt see that one

Not the widders one, could see that clearley ref made the right call. The one right on the dead ball line.

: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:33 pm  

pyeman wrote:

Not the widders one, could see that clearley ref made the right call. The one right on the dead ball line.

Ah, I couldnt see that because of the boards on the fencing

: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:36 pm  

casman2 wrote:

Ah, I couldnt see that because of the boards on the fencing

Me niether gonna watch the highlights soon so hopefully all will be clear.

: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:37 pm  

I am quoting from the BBC radio leeds commentary when i say 8(7 in the first half) i obviously have no idea weather rightly or wrongly chalked off, just wondered if we held a new record of 8 dissallowed tries in one game

: Mon Jul 13, 2009 1:19 pm  

pyeman wrote:

Me niether gonna watch the highlights soon so hopefully all will be clear.

From the side view (I was stood on the 10m line in Princess Street) it didn't look like anybody got within a foot of the ball. I think the subsequent consultation between the officials was over how to restart play since there'd been quite a few players around when the ball was kicked. I scertainly didn't think there was a case for a try to be awarded.

: Mon Jul 13, 2009 5:24 pm  

Dixon’s Try in the Second half was defiantly a try. He did go down initially on his back but he flipped over and grounded the ball. I was right in line with it and the in goal ref did rod all. What a plonker.

But saying that we scored straight after that though!!!!

How pants were Hull?

: Tue Jul 14, 2009 8:35 am  

spoonie wrote:

Dixon’s Try in the Second half was defiantly a try. He did go down initially on his back but he flipped over and grounded the ball. I was right in line with it and the in goal ref did rod all. What a plonker.

But saying that we scored straight after that though!!!!

How pants were Hull?

Are you aware of in-goal judge signals?