Re: Richie Mathers : Mon Jun 21, 2010 10:17 pm  

Fully wrote:

That's funny because according to TM he's not signed anything and both him and Shenny have had a chat. That's taken from today's League Express.

I'll take Shenton's word over Matterson's considering Matterson is one of the 3 reasons he said he was leaving.

Re: Richie Mathers : Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:27 am  

Fully wrote:

That's funny because according to TM he's not signed anything and both him and Shenny have had a chat. That's taken from today's League Express.

That's definately means he is staying after having a chat With his motivating speech how could shenton refuse Matterson charms

Re: Richie Mathers : Wed Jun 23, 2010 9:56 am  

I cant see Shenton staying all things considered about our club. He is an international and he has to make the move now to win trophies. ST Helens would be a dream move, he would be mad not to take the chance if they are in for him.
If Cas had made any progress in recent years it might of been a different story, but the club is in a sorry state sadly.
If we get a new ground and keep a franchise we should hold on to our home grown talent, but until those are achieved we have little to offer any player longterm.

Oh what would it be like to have abit of good news for a change.

Re: Richie Mathers : Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:32 pm  

pyeman wrote:

No thanks.

Why?? He'd stand out at Castleford, and he's probably too good for Castleford IMO. He's excellent, i'd have him over Hodgson any day of the week as would alot of Wire fans.

Re: Richie Mathers : Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:42 pm  

Wire_74 wrote:

Why?? He'd stand out at Castleford, and he's probably too good for Castleford IMO. He's excellent, i'd have him over Hodgson any day of the week as would alot of Wire fans.

I cant go along with your point of him being too good for us but i do agree that you would have been better off keeping him than paying out what ever sum it was to get hodgson. I think we saw the best of him last season and he hasnt really hit the headlines this year so if his decline continues you could well have bought a pup. but i would be more than happy with mathers and if rumours are to be believed he has signed a 2 year deal already but we will just have to wait and see if thats true.

Re: Richie Mathers : Fri Jun 25, 2010 6:37 pm  

tigerman10 wrote:

I cant go along with your point of him being too good for us but i do agree that you would have been better off keeping him than paying out what ever sum it was to get hodgson. I think we saw the best of him last season and he hasnt really hit the headlines this year so if his decline continues you could well have bought a pup. but i would be more than happy with mathers and if rumours are to be believed he has signed a 2 year deal already but we will just have to wait and see if thats true.

He's an outstanding fullback IMO. His posistioning, work rate, enthusiasum, desire, kick return, catching. He'll mae the odd brain fart as does everyone but he's a terrific player.

Re: Richie Mathers : Fri Jun 25, 2010 9:17 pm  

On Mathers' form this year, I would take him every day of the week. Finally means we have a proper full-back for once too.

Re: Richie Mathers : Sat Jun 26, 2010 7:38 pm  

casman2 wrote:

I agree we need to sign players up soon.

Not sure about Mathers to be honest, he is a shadow of the player he was before he left for Aus.

Any yet still better than any of your three quarter line.

Re: Richie Mathers : Sat Jun 26, 2010 9:32 pm  

Gurus_Beard wrote:

Any yet still better than any of your three quarter line.

Except Shenton and Owen.

Re: Richie Mathers : Sun Jun 27, 2010 7:51 am  

Fully wrote:

Except Shenton and Owen.

I reckon thompson and arundel will be better players than mather too.

And for that matter i would rather have wainwright given the choice!