Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Mon Jul 12, 2010 7:09 pm  

newgroundb4cas wrote:

Would you settle for a ground share on the border of Wakey and Cas? Im beggining to sway that way
we need to cut our pride and give it a go else we are both out! I am sure if the Milan giants can share we can! We are both going to be out end of. Forget Fetherstone they are a National League club and just a small town. Im not a fan who totally hates Cas I find great excitement when we play you and Cas away is certainly a match I look out for more than any other fixture Salford/Quins at home its just boring and would be sad to see you go. We need to stay in SL together build a ground on the border with bars/good facilities and share it. Common sense needs to prevail time is getting on and we are both going to be out on our ear if we don't get this sorted.

"newgroundb4cas", why what's happening with your ground?

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Mon Jul 12, 2010 7:24 pm  

newgroundb4cas wrote:

Would you settle for a ground share on the border of Wakey and Cas? Im beggining to sway that way
we need to cut our pride and give it a go else we are both out! I am sure if the Milan giants can share we can! We are both going to be out end of. Forget Fetherstone they are a National League club and just a small town. Im not a fan who totally hates Cas I find great excitement when we play you and Cas away is certainly a match I look out for more than any other fixture Salford/Quins at home its just boring and would be sad to see you go. We need to stay in SL together build a ground on the border with bars/good facilities and share it. Common sense needs to prevail time is getting on and we are both going to be out on our ear if we don't get this sorted.

I would say Newmarket/Stanley is borderline enough!

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:05 pm  

poppys mum wrote: What article fully. Wright promises "good news" surrounding the stadium within the next few weeks and says Cas are already ahead of fellow Super League strugglers – notably their neighbours Wakefield Trinity, with whom they are thought to be battling for a single place – having appointed architects and secured outline planning consent. "If it wasn't for the recession and the collapse in land prices, we could be playing there now," he said. "But we're still on track for completion at the beginning of 2012, even if the whole stadium might not be ready by the time we move in." http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2010/ju ... nts-future

poppys mum wrote: What article fully. Wright promises "good news" surrounding the stadium within the next few weeks and says Cas are already ahead of fellow Super League strugglers – notably their neighbours Wakefield Trinity, with whom they are thought to be battling for a single place – having appointed architects and secured outline planning consent. "If it wasn't for the recession and the collapse in land prices, we could be playing there now," he said. "But we're still on track for completion at the beginning of 2012, even if the whole stadium might not be ready by the time we move in." http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2010/ju ... nts-future

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:14 pm  

The funny thing is Wakey fans have now convinced themselves that we don't have outline planning permission viewtopic.php?f=33&t=462679&start=15

The funny thing is Wakey fans have now convinced themselves that we don't have outline planning permission viewtopic.php?f=33&t=462679&start=15

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:25 pm  

tropical1 wrote: The funny thing is Wakey fans have now convinced themselves that we don't have outline planning permission viewtopic.php?f=33&t=462679&start=15 Technically, they would be correct. http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/localnew ... 6242832.jp And notes from the meeting: Members at that meeting resolved to approve the application subject to a Section 106 Planning Obligation being entered into to secure the site preparation of the site for a stadium at no cost. The Planning Obligation has not been signed by the Developer and therefore the planning approval has not been issued. http://mg.wakefield.gov.uk/Published/C0 ... ocA.ps.pdf However, I would assume it will be signed at the same time as the submission of full planning permission.

tropical1 wrote: The funny thing is Wakey fans have now convinced themselves that we don't have outline planning permission viewtopic.php?f=33&t=462679&start=15 Technically, they would be correct. http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/localnew ... 6242832.jp And notes from the meeting: Members at that meeting resolved to approve the application subject to a Section 106 Planning Obligation being entered into to secure the site preparation of the site for a stadium at no cost. The Planning Obligation has not been signed by the Developer and therefore the planning approval has not been issued. http://mg.wakefield.gov.uk/Published/C0 ... ocA.ps.pdf However, I would assume it will be signed at the same time as the submission of full planning permission.

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:27 pm  

tropical1 wrote: The funny thing is Wakey fans have now convinced themselves that we don't have outline planning permission viewtopic.php?f=33&t=462679&start=15 this whole thread has come about because some of the polecats are starting to get worried their project could be on the skids, so NGBC is getting his begging bowl out to share with us but he wants the ground to be between wakey and cas, now where do you think he has in mind Newmarket perhaps. this guy is a complete tool, one week he is telling everyone they are weeks away from a decision then the next he is coming out with coments like this. let wakey stay in wakey and cas in cas whatever league that may mean playing in, thats what i say.

tropical1 wrote: The funny thing is Wakey fans have now convinced themselves that we don't have outline planning permission viewtopic.php?f=33&t=462679&start=15 this whole thread has come about because some of the polecats are starting to get worried their project could be on the skids, so NGBC is getting his begging bowl out to share with us but he wants the ground to be between wakey and cas, now where do you think he has in mind Newmarket perhaps. this guy is a complete tool, one week he is telling everyone they are weeks away from a decision then the next he is coming out with coments like this. let wakey stay in wakey and cas in cas whatever league that may mean playing in, thats what i say.

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:29 pm  

This is a post by someone on our forum he is correct you have had everything. Time we had some joy now.

i8no-one wrote:Ok, I may be a negetive person of late, but look at this way,

Cas
over the last 15 years have had everything they wanted. Millions upon millions have been spent on cas. The grant funding for Cas Panthers, Lock Lane, and next Fryston is huge, swimming baths, that new bridge at another x amount of pounds, and the infrastructure at Glasshoughton, the exscape complex, the list goes on.

Wakey

No pool, every amateur club is a disgrace in terms of club house and facilities, my club included, no funding for anything, a total and utter disgrace.

The end result ( Nostradamus)

No new ground in Wakefield, forced to play out of Glasshoughton, thanks alot Mr Box, call me a miserable pratt, but I am 150% convinced we will get the shaft the first chance they (council & RFL) get the chance

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:29 pm  

Councillor box = A CAS FAN !

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:34 pm  

Oh jeez, i fear our board is to be plagued by a bunch of idiotic Wakey fans who know very little about either project but will harp on they know much more.

All i see when i read this thread is, "i'm a wakey fan and i'm fearing my team will not get a stadium" and all i want to say in response is "we will gladly share our shiny new stadium with you at Glasshoughton for a not so small monthly fee, payable to Cas Tigers RLFC".

Re: Would you settle for a ground share on the border? : Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:37 pm  

newgroundb4cas wrote:

This is a post by someone on our forum he is correct you have had everything. Time we had some joy now.

i8no-one wrote:Ok, I may be a negetive person of late, but look at this way,

Cas
over the last 15 years have had everything they wanted. Millions upon millions have been spent on cas. The grant funding for Cas Panthers, Lock Lane, and next Fryston is huge, swimming baths, that new bridge at another x amount of pounds, and the infrastructure at Glasshoughton, the exscape complex, the list goes on.

Wakey

No pool, every amateur club is a disgrace in terms of club house and facilities, my club included, no funding for anything, a total and utter disgrace.

The end result ( Nostradamus)

No new ground in Wakefield, forced to play out of Glasshoughton, thanks alot Mr Box, call me a miserable pratt, but I am 150% convinced we will get the shaft the first chance they (council & RFL) get the chance

so which part of that is our problem and which part of that has anything to do with us goundsharing. i have read your comments on the wakey page makeing us out to be some small town neighbours who need their big city rivals to survive, but the thing is we are not going around begging people to ground share with us. and as for wakefield getting nothing (now i could be wrong here and this may not have council funding so i appologise in advance if i am) but what about the hepworth museum, the development behind the trainstation, the development on jacobswell lane, the work in the bullring, and all the upgrading work that has been done on westgate, some of that must have had council funding.