Re: Chase IS on : Sat Jul 14, 2012 11:40 am  

Overall rangi chase has been a very good player for Cas and a such is bound to attract interest from other clubs. No-one expects to keep a player forever; they come and go. The trick for the club is to ensure that a player leaves on the clubs terms and not the players.
If RC leaves and Cas get a decent fee (anything over £250,000) then we'll have done ok. Whether that then effects the perceived ambition of the club and in turn season ticket sales is another matter. I'm glad it's not a decision I have to take!!

Re: Chase IS on : Sat Jul 14, 2012 11:44 am  

steadygetyerboots-on wrote:

(anything over £250,000) then we'll have done ok. Whether that then effects the perceived ambition of the club and in turn season ticket sales is another matter. I'm glad it's not a decision I have to take!!

I wouldn't accept a penny under 500k, show the fans that he was only sold because of a stupid fee being offered then reinvest that money into the squad.

Accepting anything less is a slap in the face to the fans.

Re: Chase IS on : Sat Jul 14, 2012 11:51 am  

Gronk! wrote:

I wouldn't accept a penny under 500k, show the fans that he was only sold because of a stupid fee being offered then reinvest that money into the squad.

Accepting anything less is a slap in the face to the fans.

There is no way on earth would you get 500K, I would want Thurston or Marshall for that kind of money! and if he is unhappy at Cas there would be no point keeping a disinterested player.

I reckon the clubs will settle for about 250K, the question is whether it happens before the looming SL transfer deadline, or whether it happens at the end of the season.

Re: Chase IS on : Sat Jul 14, 2012 11:53 am  

UllFC wrote:

and if he is unhappy at Cas there would be no point keeping a disinterested player.

Well he isn't.

UllFC wrote:

I reckon the clubs will settle for about 250K, the question is whether it happens before the looming SL transfer deadline, or whether it happens at the end of the season.

No they wont, teams have been told to get lost with higher bids (one paper even suggested it would take 700k!)

You know why the club are sticking a big fee on him? Because they don't want to sell him, the same goes with Daryl Clark.

Just like every year this is Hull fans getting all worked up into thinking they will get Chase - once again the only people talking about it are Hull fans, there's nothing in it like every year.

It will be a halfback McRae has worked with before - Holdsworth or Myler.

Re: Chase IS on : Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:59 pm  

UllFC wrote:

There is no way on earth would you get 500K, I would want Thurston or Marshall for that kind of money! and if he is unhappy at Cas there would be no point keeping a disinterested player.

I reckon the clubs will settle for about 250K, the question is whether it happens before the looming SL transfer deadline, or whether it happens at the end of the season.

Haha i knew a Hull fan would come up with this drivel, hes going nowhere unless one club breaks their piggy bank!
Gronk is right anything less than a massive fee, is selling the club and fans short, not only do players of his quality rarely become available but he plays in the key position of halfback plus technically hes not available for another 3 years and you face stiff competition.

CASTLEFORD DO NOT WANT RID OF ONE OF THE BEST PLAYERS IN SUPERLEAGUE NOT NOW! NOT EVER!

Re: Chase IS on : Sat Jul 14, 2012 3:17 pm  

mrpurfect wrote:

Haha i knew a Hull fan would come up with this drivel, hes going nowhere unless one club breaks their piggy bank!
Gronk is right anything less than a massive fee, is selling the club and fans short, not only do players of his quality rarely become available but he plays in the key position of halfback plus technically hes not available for another 3 years and you face stiff competition.

CASTLEFORD DO NOT WANT RID OF ONE OF THE BEST PLAYERS IN SUPERLEAGUE NOT NOW! NOT EVER!

I'm sure you don't 'want' to get rid of him, but money talks and every player has their price.

Re: Chase IS on : Sat Jul 14, 2012 3:19 pm  

Fully wrote:

The HDM could at least check their facts:

The clubs did NOT agree any sort of transfer for Arundel - he was out of contract.

Sounds to me like they've taken the RLFans Hull forum rumour and spun it out to make an article.

They always do, it's a lousy paper.

Re: Chase IS on : Sat Jul 14, 2012 3:59 pm  

What is Hull FC's fixation with Cas Tigers players anyway ?

Re: Chase IS on : Sat Jul 14, 2012 7:07 pm  

you say hes happy at cas not what his drinking partner says,

Re: Chase IS on : Sat Jul 14, 2012 8:07 pm  

its danny brough hull are after. my mates a coach at the KC