Re: Wakefield Match Discussion and Predictions : Sat Apr 03, 2010 7:31 pm  

Gaslight wrote:

Morrison is too injury prone and moans more then McGoldrick! Obst maybe, depends on the sort of game you're going into.

Well he is not missed one game this year at Wakey. He could of been just unlucky at the Bulls. His form as been excellent. Could you honestly say that you would rather have Touson in the back row than Morrison. Could you honestly say that Jones would make a better hooker than Obst in what ever game your playing?

Re: Wakefield Match Discussion and Predictions : Sat Apr 03, 2010 7:36 pm  

Gaslight wrote:

Off the top of my head Millard & Tronc...Tronc's going home so just the one.

Gleadhill

Re: Wakefield Match Discussion and Predictions : Sat Apr 03, 2010 7:40 pm  

deeHell wrote:

Obst and Latu would be in for sure, Fergi unless you want to stick with Higgins Morrison and Jd would be a big improvement on your back row. I'm pretty sure Jeffries would get in looking at Sherwins current form. Blanch and Murphy would be a big improvement on your current wingers...need I go on!

Murhpy & Blanch are better then Ainscough & Dixon? I don't think so Higgins is a prop, so I don't think Ferguson would be an improvement there JD isn't as good as Snitch, Jones, Westerman so wouldn't get in.

Re: Wakefield Match Discussion and Predictions : Sat Apr 03, 2010 7:56 pm  

Gaslight wrote:

Murhpy & Blanch are better then Ainscough & Dixon? I don't think so Higgins is a prop, so I don't think Ferguson would be an improvement there JD isn't as good as Snitch, Jones, Westerman so wouldn't get in.

Murphy - you may live to regret that one, very good player IMO.

Re: Wakefield Match Discussion and Predictions : Sat Apr 03, 2010 8:03 pm  

Gaslight wrote:

Off the top of my head Millard & Tronc...Tronc's going home so just the one.

Oh come on, it's a few more than that. Moore is a better prop than any you have for starters. I don't think you would turn your noses up at Morrison, Ferguson, Henderson (who ripped you to bits) Jeffries, Obst (who outplayed Hudson AGAIN) or Cooke. They would all improve your team.

Yes I'd take a few of yours, but to pretend a team on twice the points doesn't have more than two players you would want is frankly absurd.

Snitch by the way has gone backwards, not half the player he was last year which is a shame.

Re: Wakefield Match Discussion and Predictions : Sat Apr 03, 2010 8:13 pm  

vastman wrote:

Oh come on, it's a few more than that. Moore is a better prop than any you have for starters. I don't think you would turn your noses up at Morrison, Ferguson, Henderson (who ripped you to bits) Jeffries, Obst (who outplayed Hudson AGAIN) or Cooke. They would all improve your team.

Yes I'd take a few of yours, but to pretend a team on twice the points doesn't have more than two players you would want is frankly absurd.

Snitch by the way has gone backwards, not half the player he was last year which is a shame.

i wouldnt argue with you, i would take a minimum of 6 of yours over that shower of ours and for anyone to say differenty is just sour grapes, i think last night showed for anyone in any doubt that this is the worst cas side since the one that got relegated in 04, snitch is going back week on week under mattersons masterplan and as for sarge beng rested/dropped its not before time for me as he has looked to be marking time untill he goes back to oz since the start of the season. but the worst thing for me about last night is that wakey were no great shakes but they were far better than us, but not to worry its only saints on monday.

Re: Wakefield Match Discussion and Predictions : Sat Apr 03, 2010 8:15 pm  

vastman wrote:

Oh come on, it's a few more than that. Moore is a better prop than any you have for starters. I don't think you would turn your noses up at Morrison, Ferguson, Henderson (who ripped you to bits) Jeffries, Obst (who outplayed Hudson AGAIN) or Cooke. They would all improve your team.

Yes I'd take a few of yours, but to pretend a team on twice the points doesn't have more than two players you would want is frankly absurd.

Snitch by the way has gone backwards, not half the player he was last year which is a shame.

Moore isn't as good as Huby so that's wrong for a start, Henderson is average at best - your Clayton. Cooke wouldn't get in the side, Chase is better, Westerman is better.

And don't over rate Murphy, wait for him to do something in the league first etc etc

Re: Wakefield Match Discussion and Predictions : Sat Apr 03, 2010 8:23 pm  

Gaslight wrote:

He still wouldn't know you'd need pretty colourful pictures and arrows for him to understand

Where is chapster found him a job

Re: Wakefield Match Discussion and Predictions : Sat Apr 03, 2010 8:24 pm  

Gaslight wrote:

Moore isn't as good as Huby so that's wrong for a start, Henderson is average at best - your Clayton. Cooke wouldn't get in the side, Chase is better, Westerman is better.

And don't over rate Murphy, wait for him to do something in the league first etc etc

i would have cooke in straight away at least he makes opportunities, get joe in 2nd row and running wide where he can do some damage instead of the short hospital balls he keeps getting down the middle, and i would take henderson over clayton too, infact i would take there mascott over clayton.

Re: Wakefield Match Discussion and Predictions : Sat Apr 03, 2010 8:29 pm  

tigerman10 wrote:

i would have cooke in straight away at least he makes opportunities, get joe in 2nd row and running wide where he can do some damage instead of the short hospital balls he keeps getting down the middle, and i would take henderson over clayton too, infact i would take there mascott over clayton.

If Cas had someone who wasn't a moron passing to Westerman (like McGoldrick now ) then playing him through the middle wouldn't be a bad thing. As for Clayton, well the water carrier is better, why doesn't he just play Holmes?!