Re: Leeds up next : Mon Aug 16, 2010 12:19 pm  

ambernotyeller wrote:

Majorca ??? were you in the 'groovy gang' ? and did you win the skateboarding in a rodney trotter stylee ? I bet mummy and daddy were so proud ................... groovy

Poor effort. Was this supposed to be funny?

Re: Leeds up next : Mon Aug 16, 2010 12:26 pm  

I hear the impending sound of keys jangling and locks being turned

Re: Leeds up next : Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:42 pm  

Sam Buca wrote:

Poor effort. Was this supposed to be funny?

Oh dear, thats usually the sign of being offended, please dont tell daddy

Re: Leeds up next : Mon Aug 16, 2010 3:24 pm  

ambernotyeller wrote:

Oh dear, thats usually the sign of being offended, please dont tell daddy

What sort of banter do you have? That comment to me usually refers to the sign that the other person not find it funny.


FWIW, how old are you all?

My 12 year old cousin could come up with some better responses than some of these.


Anyway, Poppys Mum, have you worked out how the two incidents you referred to differ from each other yet?

Re: Leeds up next : Mon Aug 16, 2010 3:40 pm  

Invincible wrote:

What sort of banter do you have? That comment to me usually refers to the sign that the other person not find it funny.


FWIW, how old are you all?

My 12 year old cousin could come up with some better responses than some of these.


Anyway, Poppys Mum, have you worked out how the two incidents you referred to differ from each other yet?

Sorry which 2 incidents are you speaking of.

Re: Leeds up next : Tue Aug 17, 2010 4:39 pm  

poppys mum wrote:

Sorry which 2 incidents are you speaking of.

Thomkins and Burgess

Re: Leeds up next : Tue Aug 17, 2010 5:35 pm  

Invincible wrote:

Thomkins and Burgess

The thompkins one was intentional by ablett.
The burgess one there was no intention at all.


Is that what you mean.

Re: Leeds up next : Tue Aug 17, 2010 5:50 pm  

poppys mum wrote:

The thompkins one was intentional by ablett.
The burgess one there was no intention at all.


Is that what you mean.

No. Thomkins was ok. Burgess on the other hand looked in a really bad way, yet the fans behind the sticks were chanting away like Cas had won a last minute try.

The incidents weren't the same. Could you even see that Burgess was moving from behind those sticks? I couldn't from where I was standing, and even some Cas fans have said how the chants were OTT whilst he was laying on the floor.

Re: Leeds up next : Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:21 pm  

Invincible wrote:

No. Thomkins was ok. Burgess on the other hand looked in a really bad way, yet the fans behind the sticks were chanting away like Cas had won a last minute try.

The incidents weren't the same. Could you even see that Burgess was moving from behind those sticks? I couldn't from where I was standing, and even some Cas fans have said how the chants were OTT whilst he was laying on the floor.

oh god get a life, he isnt permanently injured, he will recover

Re: Leeds up next : Tue Aug 17, 2010 10:01 pm  

Speedy wrote:

oh god get a life, he isnt permanently injured, he will recover

So was you part of the people in that stand then. You made the most noise I could recall all night when he was down injured.

How did you know at the time that he would recover?

It seemed extremely disrespectful, as some of your fellow Cas fans have concurred.