The relevant law is Section 10, Law 2 relating to accidental knock-on. This discussion seems to be surrounding people's interpretations of the word 'regains' within this law. If a player grounds the ball cleanly after having previously knocked-on accidentally, are they deemed to have regained the ball?
Laws of the Game Section 10 - Knock on and Forward Pass wrote:
Deliberate 1. A player shall be penalised if he deliberately knocks on or passes forward.
Accidental 2. If, after knocking-on accidentally, the player knocking-on regains or kicks the ball before it touches the ground, a goal post, cross bar or an opponent, then play shall be allowed to proceed. Otherwise play shall stop and a scrum shall be formed except after the fifth play-the-ball.
Charge-down 3. To charge-down a kick is permissible and is not a knock-on.
Heading the ball 4. It is illegal to head the ball in a forward direction.
Knock-on over Goal line After a player, from the field of play, knocks on into his opponent’s in-goal area and he or a colleague touches down, play is restarted with a scrum where the knock-on occurred, except after a play-the-ball subject to Section 12, Law 10.
My interpretation in this situation is that he hasn't regained it and that in actual fact, the ball touching the ground complete's the knock-on. However there is nothing in the glossary to clarify this, the following may be of assistance though:
Laws of the Game Section 2 - Glossary wrote:
Knock on: means to knock the ball towards the opponents’ dead ball line with hand or arm, while playing at the ball.
In Posession: means to be holding or carrying the ball.
Grounding the ball: means (a) placing the ball on the ground with hand or hands or (b) exerting a downward pressure on the ball with hand or arm, the ball itself being on the ground or (c) dropping on the ball and covering it with the part of the body above the waist and below the neck, the ball itself being on the ground.
Incidentally, an exclamation mark ends a sentence and does not require a full stop. The first letter of the next word begins a new sentence and should therefore be capitalised. Who needs flankers' grammar was actually correct.
Like it or not, to the letter of the law Liam Watts did score a try.
SECTION 6 SCORING – TRIES AND GOALS Value 1. A try shall count four points. Try and Goal A conversion goal or a penalty goal shall count two points. A drop goal during play shall count one point.
Deciding winners 2.
(a) The game shall be won by the team scoring the greater number of points. If both teams score an equal number of points, or if both teams fail to score, then the game shall be drawn.
Try – How scored 3. A try is scored when:–
(a) a player first grounds the ball in his opponents’ in-goal, provided that he is not in touch or touch in-goal or on or over the dead ball line.
(b) opposing players simultaneously ground the ball in the in-goal area provided that the attacking player is not in touch or touch in-goal or on or over the dead ball line.
Sliding try (c) a tackled player’s momentum carries him into the opponents’ in-goal where he grounds the ball even if the ball has first touched the ground in the field of play but provided that when the ball crosses the goal line the player is not in touch or touch in-goal or on or over the dead ball line.
11 mins 10 seconds into it. The ball hits the floor before he makes contact.
overthemoon wrote:
Like it or not, to the letter of the law Liam Watts did score a try.
SECTION 6 SCORING – TRIES AND GOALS Value 1. A try shall count four points. Try and Goal A conversion goal or a penalty goal shall count two points. A drop goal during play shall count one point.
Deciding winners 2.
(a) The game shall be won by the team scoring the greater number of points. If both teams score an equal number of points, or if both teams fail to score, then the game shall be drawn.
Try – How scored 3. A try is scored when:–
(a) a player first grounds the ball in his opponents’ in-goal, provided that he is not in touch or touch in-goal or on or over the dead ball line.
(b) opposing players simultaneously ground the ball in the in-goal area provided that the attacking player is not in touch or touch in-goal or on or over the dead ball line.
Sliding try (c) a tackled player’s momentum carries him into the opponents’ in-goal where he grounds the ball even if the ball has first touched the ground in the field of play but provided that when the ball crosses the goal line the player is not in touch or touch in-goal or on or over the dead ball line.
“At last, a real, Tory budget,” Daily Mail 24/9/22 "It may be that the honourable gentleman doesn't like mixing with his own side … but we on this side have a more convivial, fraternal spirit." Jacob Rees-Mogg 21/10/21
A member of the Guardian-reading, tofu-eating wokerati.
what an absolute disgrace of a decision if that was a try why wasn,t ainscough in first half i personally think the dobbins were there for the taking but u seem to switch off same problem as fc have had in the previous two seasons
The relevant law is Section 10, Law 2 relating to accidental knock-on. This discussion seems to be surrounding people's interpretations of the word 'regains' within this law. If a player grounds the ball cleanly after having previously knocked-on accidentally, are they deemed to have regained the ball?
My interpretation in this situation is that he hasn't regained it and that in actual fact, the ball touching the ground complete's the knock-on. However there is nothing in the glossary to clarify this, the following may be of assistance though:
Spot on. There's no way he 'regained' it. I would like to think that for a player to be deemed to have regained control of the ball (to nullify the accidental knock on), the player needs to have sufficient control that enables them to catch and control the ball before touching the ground i.e. in both hands or hand under the ball that prevents contact with the ground. If that is achieved then he then put down for a try.
“At last, a real, Tory budget,” Daily Mail 24/9/22 "It may be that the honourable gentleman doesn't like mixing with his own side … but we on this side have a more convivial, fraternal spirit." Jacob Rees-Mogg 21/10/21
A member of the Guardian-reading, tofu-eating wokerati.
Spot on. There's no way he 'regained' it. I would like to think that for a player to be deemed to have regained control of the ball (to nullify the accidental knock on), the player needs to have sufficient control that enables them to catch and control the ball before touching the ground i.e. in both hands or hand under the ball that prevents contact with the ground. If that is achieved then he then put down for a try.
Unfortunately, what you or me or anyone, except the VR, would like to think is irrelevant. A player does not have to be in control of the ball, he just needs to have downward pressure. Whether the law sucks is another matter.
Unfortunately, what you or me or anyone, except the VR, would like to think is irrelevant. A player does not have to be in control of the ball, he just needs to have downward pressure. Whether the law sucks is another matter.
Yes that is true for a try but if he knocks on first then it rules out the possibility for a try.