Re: Wakefield Bulls : Fri Sep 11, 2009 7:54 pm  

deeHell wrote:

Such as??????

1) Attendances
2) An ability to build a stadium without begging the council for handouts
3) Actually, an ability to build a stadium - period.
4) Fewer narrow-minded wankers whose sole purpose for posting is to launch cheap shots at their rivals.

Re: Wakefield Bulls : Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:25 pm  

Disco wrote:

1) Attendances
2) An ability to build a stadium without begging the council for handouts
3) Actually, an ability to build a stadium - period.
4) Fewer narrow-minded wankers whose sole purpose for posting is to launch cheap shots at their rivals.

Point 1, yes for now.

Point 2 and 3

Like Cas are building a stadium all off there own finances. As it stands it's cas that needs council help more than Wakey....fact! What happened to RWs prediction for Oct 08 completion?

In my original post in this thread was a reply to the narrow minded blinkered Cas fan that started the thread.

I noticed you didn't mentioned things like academy teams, League positions, woodern spoons and been in NL.

Re: Wakefield Bulls : Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:26 pm  

deeHell wrote:

Fully wrote:

Such as??????

Attendances
Ability to promote youth to first team
Fans/Fanbase
Stadium [on current basis]

Re: Wakefield Bulls : Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:35 pm  

Fully wrote:

deeHell wrote:

Attendances
Ability to promote youth to first team
Fans/Fanbase
Stadium [on current basis]

Ability to promote youth to first team, are you sure Castleford are superior than Wakey in that department, I would disagree. Consider we have just handed 7 full time contracts to out table topping academy team.

Stadium, well your is no better than ours.

I would hardly call that "many significant qualities" as you said.

Like I said before you fail to mentioned things like academy teams, League positions, woodern spoons and been in NL

Re: Wakefield Bulls : Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:50 pm  

[quote="deeHell"]Point 1, yes for now.

Point 2 and 3 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Like Cas are building a stadium all off there own finances. As it stands it's cas that needs council help more than Wakey....fact! What happened to RWs prediction for Oct 08 completion?

In my original post in this thread was a reply to the narrow minded blinkered Cas fan that started the thread.

I noticed you didn't mentioned things like academy teams, League positions, woodern spoons and been in NL. :lol:[/quote]

backwardscats and your a prick lol

Re: Wakefield Bulls : Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:56 pm  

mac of cas wrote:

backwardscats and your a prick lol

So I'm a P*** cos I defended my team on a forum!

Truth hurts old boy!

Re: Wakefield Bulls : Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:15 pm  

deeHell wrote:

Point 2 and 3

Laugh all you like mate. It's the last laugh that counts.

deeHell wrote:

I noticed you didn't mentioned things like academy teams, League positions, woodern spoons and been in NL.

Wakey never been in the lower leagues then? Two seasons in our entire history. Remind me of Wakey's record.

Re: Wakefield Bulls : Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:25 pm  

Disco wrote:

Laugh all you like mate. It's the last laugh that counts.


Wakey never been in the lower leagues then? Two seasons in our entire history. Remind me of Wakey's record.

We were laughing very loudly in 2006.

Re: Wakefield Bulls : Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:28 pm  

deeHell wrote:

We were laughing very loudly in 2006.

So you don't want to answer my direct question then? Okay.. I take it just two season in lower leagues (and champions both times) is yet another point to Cas.

: Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:31 pm  

Do you not have your own forum for pseudo-glorification?