Re: Sherwin rest? : Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:50 pm  

duke street 10 wrote:

Is that why he went to Barrow because you were struggling to pay his salary?

He went because Barrow wanted him and we didn't really need him. We saved his contract money to reinvest, it's called shrewd business management!

Re: Sherwin rest? : Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:55 pm  

deeHell wrote:

He went because Barrow wanted him and we didn't really need him. We saved his contract money to reinvest, it's called shrewd business management!

Not sure our B.O.D's know what that is

Re: Sherwin rest? : Sun Feb 21, 2010 9:09 pm  

duke street 10 wrote:

deeHell wrote:

He went because Barrow wanted him and we didn't really need him. We saved his contract money to reinvest, it's called shrewd business management![/quote]

Not sure our B.O.D's know what that is

Interesting quote coming from a wakey fan !! since when have wakey ever been shrewd business people ? Laughable mate dont you read the wakey express about their financial troubles year after year....

Re: Sherwin rest? : Sun Feb 21, 2010 9:18 pm  

Rhino Roy wrote:

Interesting quote coming from a wakey fan !! since when have wakey ever been shrewd business people ? Laughable mate dont you read the wakey express about their financial troubles year after year....

Well they certainly led the Tax man a merry dance

Re: Sherwin rest? : Sun Feb 21, 2010 9:27 pm  

tigerman1+1 wrote:

Well they certainly led the Tax man a merry dance

Not as much off a merry dance that Dickie Wrights done for you lot over your supposed new ground!

Re: Sherwin rest? : Sun Feb 21, 2010 9:30 pm  

two sides, ends to be completed at a later date, lets face it even that will have a better atmosphere than your proposed 12000+ all seater stadium that will get about 4000 if lucky..

Re: Sherwin rest? : Mon Feb 22, 2010 7:09 am  

Oh god, yet another thread derailed

Re: Sherwin rest? : Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:01 am  

This thread is about Sherwin, not stadium developments.

For what it's worth I think Friday's performance proved how much of a key player Sherwin is for us, because without him on the field we looked completely lost.

Re: Sherwin rest? : Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:07 am  

Bonzo wrote:

This thread is about Sherwin, not stadium developments.

For what it's worth I think Friday's performance proved how much of a key player Sherwin is for us, because without him on the field we looked completely lost.

I'm not sure whether that was because of the lack of Sherwon or just the lack of someone to take the pressure off of Chase. Once McGoldrick started getting into the line with him we seemed to have some ideas. Albiet it being in the last ten minutes when the game was virtually over!

I just wonder what would have happened had Mcgoldrick been at SO in stead of FB on Friday night!

Re: Sherwin rest? : Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:15 am  

Junglefever wrote:

I'm not sure whether that was because of the lack of Sherwon or just the lack of someone to take the pressure off of Chase. Once McGoldrick started getting into the line with him we seemed to have some ideas. Albiet it being in the last ten minutes when the game was virtually over!

I just wonder what would have happened had Mcgoldrick been at SO in stead of FB on Friday night!

Owen might've been at fullback and possibly not broken his leg...